Log in
Log in

or
Create an account

or
Add this product to
  • My former gear
  • My current gear
  • My wishlist
Jackson Pro Randy Rhoads RR3 (Before 2006)
Images
1/41

All user reviews of 4/5 for the Jackson Pro Randy Rhoads RR3 (Before 2006)

V/XPL/FB Shaped Guitar from Jackson belonging to the Pro series

Price engine
Classified Ads
Forums
Not satisfied with those reviews?
Filter
4.4/5
(8 reviews)
63 %
(5 reviews)
13 %
(1 review)
25 %
(2 reviews)
Write a user review
Users reviews
  • Digitalboy01Digitalboy01

    Jackson Pro Randy Rhoads RR3 (Before 2006)Published on 07/18/09 at 15:37
    (This content has been automatically translated from French)
    Toutadj t say this about ...

    UTILIZATION

    The handle is it enjoyable?

    Yes, it is. It allows a large enough rapiditidale in solos).

    Access in acute (dernires freight) is it easy?

    So has the jam, it is hard to achieve 22ime and more freight.

    Ergonomics is it good (in terms of shape, weight ...)?

    Ergonomics are good, although the guitar ale trend if we consider not a good strap.

    Do you get a good sound easy? ...

    On average (see sound).

    SOUNDS

    Appropriate are your style of music?

    More or less, let me explain. Playing mtal (large and medium distortion '), micro hard if your agreement in C or higher. But below C (G, A) the pickups were very difficult t…
    Read more
    Toutadj t say this about ...

    UTILIZATION

    The handle is it enjoyable?

    Yes, it is. It allows a large enough rapiditidale in solos).

    Access in acute (dernires freight) is it easy?

    So has the jam, it is hard to achieve 22ime and more freight.

    Ergonomics is it good (in terms of shape, weight ...)?

    Ergonomics are good, although the guitar ale trend if we consider not a good strap.

    Do you get a good sound easy? ...

    On average (see sound).

    SOUNDS

    Appropriate are your style of music?

    More or less, let me explain. Playing mtal (large and medium distortion '), micro hard if your agreement in C or higher. But below C (G, A) the pickups were very difficult to give a clean and prcis. FAN Slipknot (etc..) Pass your way. In addition, the harmonics have difficulty speaking. Without distortion, the pickups are pretty good dfendent I would say. EMG81/85 who had, I would say they their equivalent of little.

    New: It turned out that the bad sound of silent tuning down my amp. In fact, I just bought a Metal Muff and microphones are really great!

    With what (s) amplifier (s) or effect (s) do you play?

    I play on a Randall RH 200 SC (240W, amplifier trans), and speaker after EHX Metal Muff

    What kind of sound you get and with what rglages ("crystalline", "bold ",....)?

    XXX

    What are the sounds you prfrez, you dtest?

    XXX

    OVERALL OPINION

    How long have you use it?

    One and a half.

    What is the particular feature you like best and least?

    The most: its form, its microphones
    Cons: ACCS at its highs, its floyd (really mdiocre of quality).

    Have you tried many other models before acqurir?

    A few yes, ESP (Ec 500) Bc Rich (longer know their names> <)

    How do you report qualitprix?

    New Pay 600 euros (1100 CHF) in the store. I think the price is a bit excessive. You pay mainly RR (Randy. ..).

    Exprience with, you will do again this choice? ...

    Can be! See probably because I took the gallon (exprience / What skill ^ ^) thanks her!
    See less