Log in
Log in

or
Create an account

or
< All Line 6 Spider II 212 reviews
Add this product to
  • My former gear
  • My current gear
  • My wishlist
Line 6 Spider II 212
Images
1/111
Line 6 Spider II 212
Price engine
Classified Ads
Forums
Perceval Vassail Perceval Vassail
Published on 06/29/07 at 02:34
It is a digital amp (ie transistor)

It delivers 150 watts split into 2x 75 watts

-Connected to the ground by a ground connection and comes with a 2-way footwitch very poor

-For it has the classic settings namely: bass, medium, trebble, drive and volume by channel.

-I while for the effects are the links: chorus, flanger, delay, phaser, reverb and those who serve is nothing to know the sweep echo, tape echoes and tremolo (the bah ca can still pass). but we would prefer a compressor
these effects on its quality mean do not expect a G-force or other the same when it smells the sinthetique.

UTILIZATION

Configuration is very simple, the immediate grip.
yes we get it right its very easy as long as we conaisse the basic adjustments.

the manual is a sheet of paper that is more than enough, he said the amp and even the hidden functions (distortion boost, and tuner)

SOUNDS

It can cnvenir has all styles, it is a very versatile amp, for my part I play melodic metal and this is my first amp, I Interacting with a signature Ibanez Paul Gilbert DiMarzio paf pro mounted so the rendering is not bad

Aaahhh, the sound itself, then cleans the sounds are really beautiful (even if digital), it is beautiful imitations, however, the distos overdrive and even if they are convincing the stink sinthetique must still recognize him and his dire heat (transistor requires).
sonoritées some are useless: insane red, red metal (copy mesa mouaarrrfff they say) other metal such as green or green runch are very good as well as all the clean after the blues so I did have little use so I will not give my opinion on it.

OVERALL OPINION

So here, I use this amp for a year predicts, this is my first amp with which I experienced a lot of stuff.
I prefer it over its unbeatable value for money in this price range: better than a marshall mg (well it's not hard ^ ^), a randall rg 50, a roland cube.
but it's still low-end digital so the sound is quite wrong even if it is exploitable.
under the same circumstances with the same budget: yes I refer this choice, but I have seen more corn I'll probably buy a Laney vh100 or a rack.