Not satisfied with those reviews?
Filter
Our members also liked:
3.8/5(6 reviews)
17 %
50 %
17 %
Write a user review
Users reviews
Sylvain38The dream
Published on 07/25/11 at 02:18 (This content has been automatically translated from French)For a long time I rvais of this stuff, I could finally pay me.
Is certainly faster and more powerful but now these mac 500 (I 12) are treasures of crativitbr /> I recommend00
aeratoValue
Published on 07/14/14 at 06:14 (This content has been automatically translated from French)I have several, heavy machine, not really fast, correct light output, without, however, solid reliable machine, which made its proof is martin, value, easy to find room for a little repair boring and tedious interviews but still thinking. I do the scene and show, so accuracy is important to me that the more speed and they are machines which have been proven, so I guard.
I recommend a good cleaning every year, check belt tension and a little lubrication of moving parts and your machine will last a long time, very long view.30- BibivolantPublished on 01/21/07 at 16:21 (This content has been automatically translated from French)Hello, it is with surprise that I note that nobody has yet given an opinion on the MC 500. Yet it is a sacred reference! I used to provide for almost 7 years. Even today it is far from outdated. This is a premium product, which certainly is not perfect but close ... Its brightness is not the best on the market, its potential either, but the compromise price / quality is excellent. This is a reference as is the SM58 in its class. It is a reasoned choice, even hand.21
- lalypopPublished on 09/09/11 at 23:51 (This content has been automatically translated from French)I have 12 mac 500 now for almost eight years, during all this time we tried the competitor models (Clay Paky, dress, dts, and other) in the design it is true that machines are not practical in the field sav yet with minimal maintenance before they become real season monster performance in 8 years 3 failures can be ground (straps, or a position sensor (magnet)) it is clear that compared to their current machines lack of effect but are still effective.
tell you that I would do the same choice would be unnecessary because at the same rate of time it is the mac 700
I also has Read moreI have 12 mac 500 now for almost eight years, during all this time we tried the competitor models (Clay Paky, dress, dts, and other) in the design it is true that machines are not practical in the field sav yet with minimal maintenance before they become real season monster performance in 8 years 3 failures can be ground (straps, or a position sensor (magnet)) it is clear that compared to their current machines lack of effect but are still effective.
tell you that I would do the same choice would be unnecessary because at the same rate of time it is the mac 700 I also has See less20 - Sylvain38
The dream
Published on 07/25/11 at 02:19 (This content has been automatically translated from French)For a long time I rvais of this stuff, I finally was able to pay it.
Is certainly faster and more efficient but now mac 500 (I 12) are of trsors crativitbr /> I recommend30 
Anonymous Published on 06/01/10 at 05:52 (This content has been automatically translated from French)the mac 500 is an old projector from the first series "Mac" in Martin.
This is certainly not the best projector series mac, slow, heavy and can light compared to the competition of the moment (1998).
It is nonetheless highly reliable over time and will delight fixed facilities like disco for a life well-deserved end.11