All user reviews for the Behringer SHARK DSP110

The Behringer Shark DSP110 is a unique multi-fx and anti-feedback unit that is designed to be used with live PA systems. It features an ultra low-noise Mic/Line input stage with Gain control (and +48 V phantom power), automatic feedback destroyer with an auto-learn function, a delay line adjustable by time or distance, adjustable noise gate, super-musical compressor with controllable density, conversions from line level to mic level, subsonic filter and cutoff, and more.

The Behringer Sharp DSP110 has both 1/4 inch and XLR inputs and outputs, so it can be used in a variety of setups and applications. You can insert it directly into a mic signal to reduce feedback from that single mic, or put the unit through the line-level PA system, to use some of the other features on the overall PA sound. The box is nice and small, but for some applications, it would be nice to have the unit in a standard one-space rack mount. Clearly, you can rack-mount this unit with additional hardware, however.

The main reason I bought this unit was for the feedback elimination, and overall, feedback eliminating units are just not as good as you may think. The DSP100 has 12 available narrow-band filters that can be activated to reduce feedback, and the unit automatically detects what frequencies are problem frequencies. You can even set up the unit to produce an inputs sound through your PA, and it will detect the problem frequencies before you even begin to use the microphones. However, in many cases, the unit will detect too many frequencies, and it will affect the overall sound greatly. It is not transparent whatsoever, and it was a bit disappointing to hear some of the results.

Overall, this is a multi-functional unit that can be useful in the right lights, especially if you need the compressor, low-cut, and delay. But don't expect the feedback eliminator to perform miracles.

+ Anti Prampli Larsen (nickel) + + Delay + Compressor LowCut: everything in numrique
Alim phantme
In / Out XLR and Jack
Supplied

Really complete

APRS reading the doc I do not see or could be the problem. The edition of paramtres is more intuitive, quick and desire. The manual n'tait not in French, but is available on the site Berhinger for those who pose problem.

Comparison made with CHRE pramplis much he must love Berhinger criticism for remarks to big on that. It is frankly clean.

A small problem for me to have no more one, the signal processing numrique cre a delay of an inexorable 15aine MS. has spent the inaperu 3 / 4 time except the percussion or do any dcalage DIFFERENT between the microphones. I had trouble understanding why I had no sound and impact DDouble. APRs have found the problem is corrected in a cubase (or other ...) and then we put the same on any prampli micro and more of a problem.

The price quality ratio Berhinger, I think long been the strength of screws, two years and not a wrinkle. Ms. choice without problem.

A MAGICAL BOTE:
- Compressor effective
- Peak limiter
- Adjustable delay in centimtre prs!
- Noise gate
- Feedback Suppressor
and the whole auto please!
I pushed the vice until a paste sm58 speaker on my back ... Well, the Shark has me completely deleted in 3 seconds, not that I have not had to touch the mixer!
In addition to the quality numrique 24-bit, with inputs and outputs XLR and Jack, Mic (with a super pre-amp) and line.
And the home must must, as five small botes Rackmountable ct each other only take 2 UNITS UP!
It is monstrous!

The config requires some manipulation before, because the record is not empty forcment understand, but once you took the hand is a breeze to activr and disable the automatic features make for rglages trs.
Delay for both speakers, that feedback destroyer for returns, that compressor / limiter for vocals, the SHARK is remarkably versatile.

It's simple: the SHARK does not affect the sound quality of output and, while doing what is asked.
The sound is Impeccable.

I use it for several months, particularly as a suppressor of feedback, and I can not do without!
Runit it in a box of just 5cm 10cm on the CHARACTERISTICS more powerful machines!
The ratio quality price is excellent (around 100).
I highly recommend it.

Gnagnagna preamp Berhinger of shit as any preamp Berhinger of which must ...
gnagnagna delay drinking (but well ... since the preamp is crap) ...
feedback destroyer does its job of harmonic eater ...
etc..

Boring ... too long ... quend on stage you do not have a lot of time is not manageable.
This comprehensive manual says.

Nule to shit.
shit for 50 dollars more you got a presonus tube, the comparison is made soon!
and in any feedback destroyer that is useless unless your on stage sound engineer is one sucks.
it's good, what, at worst you can feedback 3 sec it does not matter, no need to fuck the harmonics.

good and bad head so the preamp button but continue to dig ... minable.minable. Briefly, the Berhinger.

Finally, the preamp tables on big scenes are usually better than Infinima That one there so I not see the point of going to rot his sound upstream.

Ideal for karaoke.

For once in behringer, a product that offers the most part, the fact that good and no frills.

Prampli, phantom
Noise gate (effective)
Time limit (not usefulness)
Compressor (limiter plutt actually, but it is quite musical)
24 dB low cut much more enjoyable than the 6 dB switches that cut anything
Anti-feedback, you know? Magical. You light, you touch anything. That's all, and it works.

No need for manual, the stuff is really well thought out.

The +: it does not fit the level of prampli converter, but rather the level of the converter pramp>> need to juggle SETTING THE gain. I do not know, and I find this idegnialissime.

The -: the invitation 5ms latency for all devices numriques mid-range. As I play the sax I dab but for a drummer can be Gnant.

This is really pramp prcis and transparent, I do not understand what happens when they fuck with behringer pramplis of playschool on their consoles, and a pure prampli this shark is not supposed to be one??

A few blows with a high gain dynamic microphone rotten, but sound great with a static or a lectret. Awesome, nothing but the pramp justify the price of toy.

EDIT 17/12 FOLLOWING THE OPINION BELOW

<p class="bbcode-cite"> Quote: <span>A Quality Sound (1 / 10)

Nule shit.
shit for 50 dollars more you got a presonus lamp, the comparison is made ​​soon!
Manir and any feedback destroyer is nothing less than your scne ing sound is one sucks.
it's good, what, at worst you can feedback 3 sec it does not matter, no need to fuck the harmonics.
</span>

o you go out to you??
It so happens that I also have a presonus lamp, and the comparison, she will
feedback in 3 sec with 1kilo faade, you'll get some friends, lol
This is not a bote prampli is a Swiss Army knife, and does not require a Swiss Army knife to cut a Laguiole, you follow me?
I ride rquilibrer Note 10 for advice
pfffff ...

Rcent purchase, for use in live pramplifier a saxophone before attacking guitar effects ... After months of research, shark silent simply the only product reasonably allow me to do a (I forgot: automatic adaptation of impdance both input and output)

He looks much indestructible, plus it is a keypad lock function (like on laptops lol) very useful since the bbte has not finished being walked on ......

Analog Preamp, everything has been said before, compressor, feedback suppression.

Config general condition of having a simple notions of cuts. Anti feedback filters of 12 frequencies a bit too much for my taste.

Compression is natural but rather the anti feedback tends to sound too crushed or rather eat one of the sound spectrum. against by the preamp is very good (surprisingly better than the new consoles behringer).

For six months, but with the experience I would choose a rather good anti-feedback and a compressor, and preamps separate and much better quality for only 20 X more. C ca the great strength of behringer.

produced generally good for those who have no means great sound engineers ...

a rack antilarsen

Hello and best wishes to all,
The manual is not very clear but the shark is not very complicated either.



Using a microphone is simple and the sound is correct provided you do not use all functions at once.



I for 1 month. This is my first antilarsen except the equalizer DBX 231 which can also tier at bp feedback. But this is not the same either.

I like its ergonomics and ease of use.

What I dislike:

1) There is not even a foot slip in the box. It slips every time you touch a button. (In its rack, there is one more bp).

2) A button to disable or enable rapid compressor would be useful for me.

3) the explanation in the manual, the potentiometer clip level is not very clear.
For me, turning to the right of the clip I digress. Turning left, I go back to flashing red light (clip) and I strongly deteriorates the quality of sound.

If someone can tell me how to rule it mean I am willing to review.

4) I do not like transformers with a son on each side. Why not be put in the box. It would be bigger!! Ok but you still have the trainer and the authority behind it something more than a store for cafasse own.
For 75 Euro, it's a real little Swiss Army knife to be used sparingly.
Soon
Disis

I have this thing for centuries, still works nickel.
I do not think it is analog, however, but the microphone gain setting is via the back button so the signal is probably transformed after.
For a mini size, you have everything: delay line, compressor Music adjustable power supply 48v, output level adjustment in short it's great.
The feedback filter once started does not affect the sound, but it triggered the absolute horror impossible to obtain a correct result with an electroacoustic guitar.

The level at the rear is simple, with clip LED. For direct electric guitar I put into active di box with 15db pad-and button level remains at zero without clip.

The level on the front is weird but fairly intuitive, note that here I do not know at all what I listen to the best result and I touch more!

The compressor is great, as we can adjust the intensity of the attack and the result is music (always with electroacoustic, and direct electric Via di).
The gate is the same, it is used to filter when not playing and not to arrange a fender ... operation will fail anyway!

The delay line, royal walls of guitars (in this case I put the shark in the effects loop of the table and return on breaded slice in contrast to the original track). Time in milliseconds, so good.

All that is simple, the feedback filter I can not, but maybe not at all! In fact I have more problems with sound and feedback than without.

Is not a bad quality, clean but not clinical. And like everything else it really works less well when I have to spend shark.

Attention, I use it either with the law in electroacoustic (comp-gate, and low for a monitor with only a microphone input)
either with an electric dibox law in force (comp-gate, and line level preamp tube in my ada).
Not tried it with voice or anything, just for a screen test with a microphone audiotecnica pro37r (acoustic guitar, violin) and also the sound was good (no gate or anything, and that the 48v preamp for the mic ) but the microphone is pretty good.

Ben here, I do not even know why I bought it.
The shark makes me great service, her love for AC power supply 2 leads come a long length available. I put the seal door bottom, slip. It heats a lot when we play with cons, it changes other digital gadgets.

Cons by anti larsen, fortunately I have no use because it does not work at all and plus the sound is rotten with the module started.

Okay, I like the widget very useful because it disrupts anything by mistake as opposed to a chain of pedals (compressor-gate-preamp) full of buttons on the back.

If I had to lose I think I would buy one in view of its reliability and service.