All user reviews for the HK Audio Lucas 1000

I used Lucas 1000 for 2 years.
I made this choice because of the space, power bass ...
I used it in a group with a cello, acoustic guitar, vocals ...
The sound is not very late .. and it lacks a lot of presence in the lower midrange, low cut filter is not adjustable, it is particularly crippling for brass, cello, male voices, or we lose a part of the spectrum of heat, making up almost incomprehensible voice ...
I changed for YAMAHA powered speakers 450 w, the power ratio, sound quality is much higher than for a slightly higher price ...
I had the opportunity to listen to techno parties, drum n 'bass or lucas 1000 gave entiére satisfaction for me avoid this type of configuration group ..

1. OPINION GLOBAL
How long have you use it? Two months
Have you tried many other models before buying it? No
What is so special that you like most? Ease of implementation, fits easily into a system (used as a subwoofer, satellites as return, XLR outputs feed the active speakers in the front)
What is the particular feature you like least? The fragility of the housing to easily skinned, weight, lack of warning light (it suddenly clipe)
With experience, you do again this choice? Yes, used alone or in the composition of a system it honestly work. Satellites have enough screaming to correct the acute table, personally I replaced with S-15 Wharfedale EVP for an optimal medium for bass.

I use the HK 1000 for 5 months. Systm This is very practical for groups without a lot of money and need sound in rptition or doing concerts in small venues. The Systm is composed of a box for the sub woofer 600 watts and two SatLite amplifier 2 x 150 watts. The total power of Systm is 900 Watts.
I tried another Systm Mackie who looks nice, but not comparable in quality price (one rating SatLite Mackie Systm price of HK).
The report of Systm HK trs is good for about 1830 (12000 dollars) you have a system that complete (cblage and feet included) o are runis dissemination and amplification and a filter. Mount in minutes and prt crack, simply connect a mixer or direct keyboard or CD player, and go!
The sound is of good quality and well equilibrated frquences serious and grave below is a good prsence and SatLite it's a late trs (brightness). Small BMOL on frquences mdium dig too (this is easily corrected the table).
Dveloppe power is satisfactory and a system that trs limiter being protected each floor.
Note that you can add a second Systm HK 1000 to double the power and possder two sub instead of the other two can be used as SatLite retous or complter the fa ade.
Perfect for concerts in bars and other important advantage: small footprint (fits in a car).

The HK Audio LUCAS 1000 is an excellent product. Be careful because there are large diffrence in quality between the products in the LUCAS.

Indeed, the LUCAS XT 600 and are much cheaper (almost half price) but they are teams of piezo-electric tweeters, a small 12-inch woofer and medium HP but no more correct, with no amplification bad, but a little soft and harmonic distortion visible in the mediums. While the acute shortage of some energy. However, they are much cheaper that the system Mac Mah Triflex competitor, which also does not possde-limiting features of the processor that small Systmes intgrent dj.
With the LUCAS 1000, everything changes. Double the price, but is ay, there was real compression tweeters (Eminence APT-150), the 15-inch subwoofer is out of proportion, and amplification, which does not contain the same components, is clearly more dynamic. The sound is much thinner, clear, with much deeper bass. In fact from 1000 is changed carrment class of product.

Only downside: the finish is fragile ... plutt

LUCAS 1000 is therefore, in my opinion, every penny, even if one has reconnatre the quality of Mackie SRM-450, or Systmes behringer, when same are excellent products, APRS trying LUCAS 1000, I decided, for reasons of personal sensitivity, to adopt it.

I use this system since late 2004.

I read with great attention to other opinions, so I would react.

First it is important to remember that it is a system primarily for occasional use. (Semi-pro)

This is a very short range that is made for "sound" quickly (without too much complicated adjustment) (it is also very difficult to change the grain hollow in HK medium)

It is not at all in hardware pro. (Even if presented as such)

I use it when I want to avoid installing too long to implement (or small wedding style piano bar)
In any case it becomes catastrophic if your audience is too large (from 150)
For the limiter (not detachable) mutes the sound so very brutal.
In addition, because short-range sound is very much changed beyond a few meters (harmonic losses and reflections)

Of course, at that price you can not have high quality, even if it is a nice sound system and correct as the use remains appropriate for the product.

All that to say that I have the impression that some think they have a professional and super class!
It is true that the use of this system and very simple but the sound is what it is!
Just okay.

For the purists, I invite you to compare it to other equivalent systems in power but at medium or long range.
You will notice the difference! (And not much more expensive)

Hi all!
It's been three years since we use the lucas 1000.
After the time of discovery, that of pleasure, here today taking stock:
It's always the money!
- It is a convenient, reliable and balanced
- Voice and instruments go well and few changes are necessary to "ring"
- The price is at the height of the product
- My problem ss dealer provides customer service and small galleys are well managed by
the importer.
After 300 nights:
-The cabinet making is dead (the medium does not like the way)
-Electronics no longer follows (limiter LED lit continuously)
- The sound changes when the lucas is hot
- The momentum is gone
- Fuzzy feeling, almost reverse-phase mid-evening.

In short, if you make some nights, it runs but it is not pro material!

We are very pleased qd same but soon we move towards a facade
more "robust".
In this regard, I am fond of your advice on sound systems between 1000 and 2000 w amplified or not musicians + songs!
And thank you +
chichi

Uses the system for 5 years 600w
I love the most weight, ease of installation, sound, on
there is nothing I dislike in this system
I have a 10 nexo bricks and I quickly dropped it all to buy this wonder
value for money is simply unbeatable, outstanding
you really have ears plugged, or the Peter Graves to find that this system
is low-end or other rubbish I have read here
when his pseudo fragility, I assure you that I do not spare, and I never had any problems
even in the halls or the acoustic is more horrible than you can imagine, you come to get sound
I have a console Yamaha 01V is a perfect compromise for this system
I play gigs in pubs and bars in piano bars of up to 300 people
plans outdoor
Battery fully transplanted, transplanted low, keyboards and guitar songs
dances of more than 500personnes outdoors

I believe that with the experience I have never bought anything in particular
it is simply a pure delight
thank you HK
Obviously if you prod the concerts and high end, you have nothing to do here, you should have what it takes,
but for all plans zicos, piano bar and others, it is pure ball
whether the system 600 or 1000 will be closed eyes

- How long have you use it?
I just give you my impressions after a few uses of a double system lukas 1000 (4 satellites, sub 2) belonging to a friend. Use was made of outside (300/500 persons) with a vocal, keyboards and audio (nothing too aggressive ....)

- Have you tried many other models before buying it?
yes, a dozen

- Reliability: No failure reported since 2 years
- Overall dimensions: well, the system is optimized on that point
- Finish: good impression
- Equipment: complete, nothing has been forgotten
- Power: I think the power announced by the manufacturer overestimated (not measured, but I refer to my 20 years of experience). Besides, my buddy had originally bought a set and he quickly found limited, hence the need for him to acquire a second.
- Commissioning: Quick and easy
- Transport: nothing to say for the satellites (one in each hand), for against the subwoofer is very heavy (it includes the amplification of part 3 pregnant ....) And low back pain awaits you if you want to lift it alone.
- Sound: good impression on first listen. The scale has no particular problem because the system is relatively well balanced. However, the treble is back and this is confirmed by the slight updates to the console MACKIE and are located in this part of the sound spectrum.
- Satellites: even if one feels that this part of the design is optimized HK AUDIO has not made a miracle and the laws of physics are met ... the satellites are small, the speakers also ... .. and it is felt as soon as you push a little. To my taste the game medium is the acute weakness of the system.
- The subwoofer: it is the pleasant surprise of all and it certainly contributes to the good impression felt. Presumably, the woofer must be filtered high enough and must collect much of the signal, it nevertheless reproduces bass clean and round without showing particular weakness.

Conclusion:
The LUKAS 1000 is a good system and its use must be well targeted. It is designed for small ensembles playing to an audience of 200/300 people looking for a small footprint and fast startup. If you are fond triphonic system and a budget equivalent (by accepting a larger space), look on the side of the speakers + subwoofer amplified (PEAVEY, YAMAHA ....). You will have a true compression, a boomer of 31 or 38 cm per speaker and a power and a higher yield with better sound spectrum allocated. In addition, each speaker has its own amplification, the weight will be more balanced (not everything is integrated in the sub ...) and commissioning will be easier.

- Serves:
sound
The size (the highlight of this set)
Equipment

- Against:
overestimated the power (not measured, it is an impression ...)
The high price if looking for a small footprint is not a priority

- With experience, you do again this choice? ...
yes, targeted use (see conclusions) and a budget maximum of 1500 euros.

Well, after 3 years of use HK Lucas 1000 in various benefits a notice here that I hope to target this system:

- Strengths:

* Small size, ease of transport
* Simplified wiring, everything is in the subwoofer (amplifier, filter)
* Yield satisfactory 38cm in serious
* Easy expansion (with Lucas second example)
* Robustness (rain / cold / humidity / shock variety ...)
- Weaknesses:

* Limiting non-detachable and easy 'clip-'
* Sonnorité a little too "mobile disco" difficult to refine sound live
* Sound discomobile for 100 people, 80 people maximum sound great live (and inside) but well below the 150 people announced on pubs
* Curve not adjustable filters
* Limiter very present in the media, to highlight a difficulty voice amidst big bass

I worked with the System HK Lucas 1000 for 2 years in various benefits, sometimes even by coupling two systems and this is my opinion:

- Strengths:

* Small footprint, ease of transport
* Simplified wiring, everything is in the subwoofer (amplifier, filters)
* Satisfactory performance of 38cm in serious
* Easy expansion (with a second example Lucas)
* The amp and electronics are generally well thought out and offers a good value for money
- Weaknesses:

* Limiting non-detachable and easy 'clip-'
* Tone too 'mobile disco' and very difficult to refine into live sound, a huge power loss related to a clear EQ for the live.
* Sound discomobile for 100 people, 50 people maximum sound great live (and indoor).
* Curve not adjustable filters
* Limiter strong presence in the media, unable to bring out a voice in the midst of big bass.
* A good mixer is needed to refine the equalizer depending on the benefit.
* Fragility of the system, no secrets to trim the weight, the wood used in manufacturing is less dense (note I did not say thinner) so the first little shock abyss and begins on the wood. This also supports the passage very poorly wet to very dry (I say this for the benefit and outdoors in summer, like the day before he pluviote and the next big sun)
* Premature wear of HP, is the points that really hurt because there is no justified reason gain weight or size (except the price). The HP headers are used for the HP low-end tire very quickly. Suddenly your system quickly loses power.
* Finally it is a very short range, even if you double it, after 10m max distortion.

In conclusion if you are heading to flee the live system, which will do you no good ....
EV Eliminator prefer him, or DAS DS115A + SUB18A.
I personally use the latter system and value for money is incomparable.