Become a member
Become a member

or
Continue with Google
Log in
Log in

or
Log in using a Google account
Add this product to
  • Mon ancien matos
  • My current gear
  • My wishlist
Mackie SRM550
Images
1/26

All user reviews for the Mackie SRM550

Powered PA Speaker Cabinet from Mackie belonging to the SRM series.

Not satisfied with those reviews?
Filter
Keywords
Average Score:
(5/5 based on 1 review)
1 review
100 %
Write a user review
Audience: Anyone Value For Money : Excellent
Users reviews
  • Webfree79Webfree79

    A little known product - and that's a pity...

    Mackie SRM550Published on 11/15/15 at 09:13
    I only bought it this very week, this is more of a first experience than a real review. I'll edit this post as I get more experienced with it. I'll compare it with the QSC K10 that I own and soon also to a friend's FBT Promaxx 14A.

    To begin with, the first impression when unpacking is good, quality seems good, Mackie says it is built like a tank and it sure does looks sturdy: a good point! The enclosure is made of wood and the coating seems less fragile than that of my QSC, another good point (QSCs really are really scratch-sensitive).

    The height and weight are compact for a 12" enclosure: 17kg. This is less cumbersome and heavy than the QSC K12 (whom they are direct competitors). As …
    Read more
    I only bought it this very week, this is more of a first experience than a real review. I'll edit this post as I get more experienced with it. I'll compare it with the QSC K10 that I own and soon also to a friend's FBT Promaxx 14A.

    To begin with, the first impression when unpacking is good, quality seems good, Mackie says it is built like a tank and it sure does looks sturdy: a good point! The enclosure is made of wood and the coating seems less fragile than that of my QSC, another good point (QSCs really are really scratch-sensitive).

    The height and weight are compact for a 12" enclosure: 17kg. This is less cumbersome and heavy than the QSC K12 (whom they are direct competitors). As far as size and weight are concerned, they are in between QSC's K10 and K12.
    Yet, the Mackie model is deeper due to its 60° inclination for use as a monitor loudspeaker, there is a rather protruding slanted side, the only cloud on the horizon regarding its dimensions. However, due to its inclination, it works wonder as a live monitor. It's also missing notched, easier to set knobs.

    There's a handle on each side so you don't really feel the 2.3 more kilograms compared with the K10 since you lift it with both hands.

    Connectingwise, it's just like the QSC: 2 combo XLR/Jack plugs, with independant volume controls and an RCA in. Regarding the outs, a there's a Thru to allow chaining cabs while being able to choose between mixing channel 1 alone or both stereo channels.

    In addition compared with the QSC, there is a 4-band feedback destroyer, which I haven't had the opportunity to try yet but can sometimes be useful in monitoring use.

    The DSP includes 4 settings: PA, to be used with a subwoofer ; DJ, for use without a subwoofer (so bass sounds are amplified) ; Monitor for live monitoring use (more neutral, less bassy sound); and finally Solo, to plug directly a guitar and mic in for instance.

    Unlike the QSC, there is no fan in the back, so it it a little less noisy (even if the K10's noise level is not a real problem anyway).

    Now, soundwise:

    It sounds good, and how powerful!! I still compare it to the QSC K10 (which are already very good). More power, a little less distortion and a little mort bass (quite logical, it's a 12").
    3 to 5 more dB with a similar sound diffusion and a great headroom. Mackie announces 800W RMS, I can believe that since the QSC K10 are sold for 1000W in digital (so roughly to be divided by 2) and the Mackie for 1600W.
    Frequencies are well defined and it's a little less shrilly at high volume as the Mackie goes lower: 49Hz, to be compared with the QSC K10's 60Hz, the K12's 52Hz and the FBT Promaxx 14A's 45Hz (but this one features a 14" speaker).

    In a nutshell, the QSC K&à and K12 are excellent as everyone says, but these Mackie don't prove unworthy at all and are currently a little cheaper than the K12.

    EDIT from May 2015: In Europe, the price of Mackie products have started raising dramatically (perhaps due to the evolution of currency exchanges?), now the SRM 550 are €799 (still €899 for the K12).
    EDIT from October 2015: the SRM 550 are back to €599!? What is Mackie doing exactly!?

    Now as far as reliability is concerned only time will tell, at a certain given period Mackie suffered (justified) criticisms in that regard. The QSC are very reliable, 4 years of use and still working perfectly... I think Mackie have learnt from the past and are back to the front stage with well-conceived products at more than correct prices. Granted, these are made in China (just like the QSC by the way), but this is also the case of Apple products which quality/reliability are proven.

    EDIT from May 2015:
    Still very happy from these speakers and with an additional mono subwoofer that's heavy material! We have tried it with my band (drums, bass, guitar, keyboards, male and female singers) in 2.1 and everything is there! The subwoofer is powerful, quite precise and not -so- heavy (29 kg!). There's largely enough power for an indoor show with 300 in attendance, and no noise unwanted or distortion, it's loud but agreeable. We were driven by a QSC Touchmix 16 mixer (an excellent mixer with no noise by the way...). For outdoor, I believe at least 2 subs and 2 satellites should be considered for more headroom. But indoor, for small rooms with not many people (200 or less) the two satellites should be enough, and just in case xompleting it with an additional SRM 1850 will suffice.
    See less
cookies
We are using cookies!

Yes, Audiofanzine is using cookies. Since the last thing that we want is disturbing your diet with too much fat or too much sugar, you'll be glad to learn that we made them ourselves with fresh, organic and fair ingredients, and with a perfect nutritional balance. What this means is that the data we store in them is used to enhance your use of our website as well as improve your user experience on our pages (learn more). To configure your cookie preferences, click here.

We did not wait for a law to make us respect our members and visitors' privacy. The cookies that we use are only meant to improve your experience on our website.

Our cookies
Cookies not subject to consent
These are cookies that guarantee the proper functioning of Audiofanzine and allow its optimization. The website cannot function properly without these cookies. Example: cookies that help you stay logged in from page to page or that help customizing your usage of the website (dark mode or filters).
Google Analytics
We are using Google Analytics in order to better understand the use that our visitors make of our website in an attempt to improve it.
Advertising
This information allows us to show you personalized advertisements thanks to which Audiofanzine is financed. By unchecking this box you will still have advertisements but they may be less interesting :) We are using Google Ad Manager to display part of our ads, or tools integrated to our own CMS for the rest.

We did not wait for a law to make us respect our members and visitors' privacy. The cookies that we use are only meant to improve your experience on our website.

Our cookies
Cookies not subject to consent

These are cookies that guarantee the proper functioning of Audiofanzine. The website cannot function properly without these cookies. Examples: cookies that help you stay logged in from page to page or that help customizing your usage of the website (dark mode or filters).

Google Analytics

We are using Google Analytics in order to better understand the use that our visitors make of our website in an attempt to improve it. When this parameter is activated, no personal information is sent to Google and the IP addresses are anonymized.

Advertising

This information allows us to show you personalized advertisements thanks to which Audiofanzine is financed. By unchecking this box you will still have advertisements but they may be less interesting :) We are using Google Ad Manager to display part of our ads, or tools integrated to our own CMS for the rest.


You can find more details on data protection in our privacy policy.
You can also find information about how Google uses personal data by following this link.