All user reviews of 4/5 for the E-MU Emax

Polyphony 8 notes, 1 mga non-expandable RAM, 12-bit chantillonage ... and all menus and submenus in front faade is very practical. The RAM is a bit short: the EMAX is Designed to save tons of crystal clear sound, but a unique sound to work, the Manir a synthtiseur. MIDI is implementations, the chorus is good and does not divide the polyphony of the bte. The filters of the EMAX are absolutely extraordinary. No FX Intgr. The EMAX is solid as a tank. (And also the weight of a tank ...). The keyboard of 61 keys is not the best of the EMAX CHARACTERISTICS ... But there are eight outputs spares + 1 + normal output pair other little goodies rear faade.

UTILIZATION

Not bad at all, write to the IDE on the sampler menus and submenus: for the rest, the edition of the loops is tedious and the computation time a little long. Everything is on disk, including the OS. No loading sounds for the game buttons Rubberized trs enjoyable to the touch.

SOUNDS

Gniales! The sound is warm, bold ... The filters are falling down, the LFO modulate the pan, pitch, tremolo ... I got good trs rsultats sample in one or two in this lovely old analog bte ... Rsultat convincing a sampler that sounds like a pro, and has not trspchu this little cold ct What gnralement the samplers: the EMAX a coronation personality.

OVERALL OPINION

If you want 30 minutes of sample crystalline quality CD sound, look elsewhere: the EMAX is an old sampler with little RAM - just enough to do what he does best, ie take on the 5 octaves and hack so that one wonders if the EMAX is a sampler or synthtiseur.

Nothing more to say but the site info Scsiforsamplers sell dsormais racks compact flash to back up your sounds, but for Emax HD / HDSE, unfortunately not for this model.

Uh if prvoyez some space is big and heavy the guy.

UTILIZATION

For me it lacks an important parameter, the glideslope.
Next to the frquence chantillonage we can not "taler" on the sample as many notes as desired. It is better to know.

The edition is my faith in the E-mu's era, a little long but not as well dsagrable pens.
Obviously compared to today's apps can not fight it ...

SOUNDS

Spa in my habits but ... able, it is round, it's beautiful, it's clean or dirty, it's E-mu oldschool adfouraille, if so

About the results despite the improbable age of vnrable, a water sample or Zique film in 10 khz and dtunez l. .. It sounds like a synth granular but with a more bold, profound, and really dirty.

The filter has a cool sound even pushed back by only lowpass cons.

pti comparo the prompt:
I think he does better than MS in sound level, at least over the SP12turbo I had. Indeed it can sound cleaner than the SP and thus be less connotes. For example I am confused at the hi-hats, cymbals (among others) played in the style.
Note that it can also sound more dirty!
Compared the SP12 at least we can totally zap filtering or envy and assayed in real time.
MS is Ingal to tune sounds by looping and cons, do it with a fader has its rulez just everything that makes h h.

Otherwise ay lot like when even if a sample frquence close to that of MS. It is neither worse nor better, it's DIFFERENT and it sounds good at all.
Me I'm absolutely amliorer my channel sampling vinyl to honor him, I currently going through a terrible and Pramper RIAA not blowing (that of a filter Electrix).
Idalie I would need a good eq before sampling too.
I thought a small A & E that would Xone Pramper eq + + analog filter has would not hurt him to think I get the most juice.

OVERALL OPINION

Why we do more to sample with as much character these days?
It's a shame.

Sound like a modern interface and, for a person rhaaaa Emax PCIexpress?