Log in
Log in

or
Create an account

or
< All Sennheiser e 865 reviews
Add this product to
  • My former gear
  • My current gear
  • My wishlist
Sennheiser e 865
Images
1/103
Sennheiser e 865
Tonton.Babar Tonton.Babar
Published on 08/30/06 at 02:13
Micro electro-static transistor intended to be sung ncessitant an alim fantme

see website for www.sennheiser.fr dtails

OVERALL OPINION

I've had a few days and I had great fun with dj ... I bought APRS have tried several (via lease), such as c535 and AKG SHURE beta 87, and live recording. I am not a professional sound but I think he plays in the same range: a part of the "expensive Swiss" in Contents of micro ...

In fact, I opt for it just for the price and I think that was well in hand (for "big paws," the other 2 are slightly Drout). In addition, it seemed to me that this mark, as the other 2 I tried, with good reputable. A ct of a, it's true he does ausi weight ...

This is my first electrostatic spcial singing j'apprcie the Manir which modulate the sound of little micro depending how it is positioned. On the live, I have not tried in overhead but it seems that he plutt so well (in the words of a friend of mine, also owner of the box).
I also tried to registration: trs performance for voice recording (normal, you might say ...) but also as micro trs INTERESTED room (j 't have much bleuf.

In short, I did not Russia even take it into default since in addition, it does not catch: even pushing trs far, there is no feedback (unless Obviously to use it as a pig ...)

Until now, outside a first prize in lectret Shure, I only use dynamic and I m'aperois that this technology really dates ... If c'tait again, I believe that microphones Contents voice, I would not take more than the kind of electrostatic microphones Sennheiser what, who, in addition, a much wider bandwidth and therefore also richer in harmonics, and that really a "potato" not credible.

For résumé is a good mic, good everything, and reasonable price for quality. I no longer have that esprer they age well ... lol

PS: I put 9 because that perfection is not of this world ...