Not satisfied with those reviews?
Filter
Our members also liked:
Average Score:( 2.3/5 based on 6 reviews )
1 review
17 %
1 review
17 %
2 reviews
33 %
Write a user review
Users reviews
DjMutantPublished on 12/26/09 at 13:32 (This content has been automatically translated from French)I do not use much my MF100. I have just to try it out and flow is the same as at the beginning (rotten jet 2metres no more. In short I dismounted to see inside. Nothing spectacular ... The nozzle is small . I just increase the flow by drilling with a wick 1.5mm and, surprise !!! The flow goes from 2m to 4m. For those who have the same machine that I, adopt a solution.00
Dj jéjéPublished on 12/28/04 at 15:17 (This content has been automatically translated from French)This was my first smoke machine but ... ... I dropped it after a year and 3 months
Well, I must say that I used extensively, but almost a year and a half, it seems to me to be.
It is not very tough, we must crush the REMOTE CONTROL for a long time to complete a
average room. Also, the price: I do have: 89 Euros !!!!!!!!!!!! (And just to 80m3/minute)
I advise everyone to buy it00- dj papeetePublished on 11/02/05 at 05:06 (This content has been automatically translated from French)I use it for 3 years.
Small fog machine Simp.
The value for money is good.
If it again I think I will turn to a magnum of 2000 in Martin, but honestly this one works very well for medium and pieces for parties of 70 people I still use it today's. A buy eyes closed.00 
Anonymous Published on 05/07/07 at 09:18 (This content has been automatically translated from French)Just bad! This machine is a scam that should not buy. The heating time is really long! Very long! And obviously it still hot when you need it!
The other thing is that it's boring all the tank that heats so if you want to replenish the liquid it is necessary to cool the engine. It's true that as it stop all the time to warm it very rarely empty the tank!
For even took you to buy a GENI Atmos Fog900, ptite a wonder! Do not ever stop and debits CARREMENT well!00- DjMutantPublished on 12/26/09 at 13:32 (This content has been automatically translated from French)I use my little MF100. I'm from out to try and throughput is the same as at the beginning (2 meters throw rotten no more, smoke fine and not dense at all). In short I was taken apart to see inside. Nothing special ... The nozzle is small. I just increase the flow in drill a 1.5mm and, surprise! Throughput increased from 2m to 4m with a smoke denser and wider too. I just filled my garage smoke by pressing 3 seconds for a garage of 20m ². For those who have the same machine as me, a way to go.00
- pierregui54Published on 02/28/10 at 07:00 (This content has been automatically translated from French)A smoke machine clearly avoid!
Pros:
- Made all the same smoke
Cons:
- The heating time is too long (4 minutes) plus a bit of smoke s'chappant machine during it ...
- The nozzle with a hole too small, so DBiT too low relative to capacity (drill, and it rgl!)
- The remote, as in many machines smokes too short.
- A command of another system clearly does have a default and more (eg DMX)
- No possibility of the rgler DBiT
My use:
I use it mainly for the mobile disco with a mandrilo taler for the smokes.
Using this machine for the concerts is harder (hard to get a really smokes homogne)
Fortunately I did not pay this machine, I have been given. After several uses I rea…Read moreA smoke machine clearly avoid!
Pros:
- Made all the same smoke
Cons:
- The heating time is too long (4 minutes) plus a bit of smoke s'chappant machine during it ...
- The nozzle with a hole too small, so DBiT too low relative to capacity (drill, and it rgl!)
- The remote, as in many machines smokes too short.
- A command of another system clearly does have a default and more (eg DMX)
- No possibility of the rgler DBiT
My use:
I use it mainly for the mobile disco with a mandrilo taler for the smokes.
Using this machine for the concerts is harder (hard to get a really smokes homogne)
Fortunately I did not pay this machine, I have been given. After several uses I realized that not so generous gesture n'tait actually ^ ^.See less00
