Log in
Log in

or
Create an account

or
Add this product to
  • My former gear
  • My current gear
  • My wishlist
SoundTrek Jammer Pro 3.0
Images
1/3

All user reviews for the SoundTrek Jammer Pro 3.0

Price engine
Classified Ads
Forums
Not satisfied with those reviews?
Filter
4.0/5
(1 reviews)
100 %
(1 review)
Write a user review
Users reviews
  • Amok_Amok_

    Very right to accompany or call

    SoundTrek Jammer Pro 3.0Published on 11/30/12 at 04:10
    (This content has been automatically translated from French)
    I bought Jammer Pro V3 in 1998 I think (diskettes in!)
    Works without problem under win 98, win XP and win 7

    French manual well.

    We choose a group style (rock, pop, folk, ...) and part (intro, groove, break, ending) and there are usually 4/5 musicians attached to a set of measure. To change parties, it re-selects or group is copied from another part of the song.
    Components are assembled as one complete.
    Then it shows the chords, and play.
    You can transpose, add / delete actions, parties, and especially touch style of each virtual musician.

    SUITABILITY/PERFORMANCE

    Software extremely light (due to its age)
    In my version, as of midday, no vst possible.
    Possible expo…
    Read more
    I bought Jammer Pro V3 in 1998 I think (diskettes in!)
    Works without problem under win 98, win XP and win 7

    French manual well.

    We choose a group style (rock, pop, folk, ...) and part (intro, groove, break, ending) and there are usually 4/5 musicians attached to a set of measure. To change parties, it re-selects or group is copied from another part of the song.
    Components are assembled as one complete.
    Then it shows the chords, and play.
    You can transpose, add / delete actions, parties, and especially touch style of each virtual musician.

    SUITABILITY/PERFORMANCE

    Software extremely light (due to its age)
    In my version, as of midday, no vst possible.
    Possible export midi file

    OVERALL OPINION

    I've had at least 14 years and I occasionnelement reused.
    To accompany him, he more or less equivalent to Band in a box.

    To compose, I preferred at the time to BIAB, because you can manage the architecture of the piece as you want, add rolling drums, breaks, ...
    Regarding styles, they are correct no more (my old version), but you can change styles and give directions to each game virtual musicians.

    Otherwise I have a sequencer / arranger hard, yamaha QY100, which is not bad either and I have owned a roland pma5 (down)
    These hards have much better styles.
    Now this may have changed since 1998
    See less