View other reviews for this product:
_Fishman_
Published on 12/19/04 at 08:02
- Installation is it without problem?
No problem, not fifteen miles PARAMETERS files as in other software, buffer size ... style, very easy
Have you experienced any incompatibility?
Yes with samples of fruity loops, some wav files are not recognized, weird ... but with all my other samples ca rolls and so far most vst vsti and fx that I walk with him install the software even if it recognizes a vst or vsti, that is not fruity
Gnrale configuration is easy?
To pluto is a simple tracker even if it's still very confusing to write like that at the beginning
The manual is clear and sufficient? ...
no manual in the beta (the one that is so free), but by searching the net I found a few tutorials online and unfortunately in English ...
SUITABILITY/PERFORMANCE
What is the configuration of your computer? (Motherboard / CPU / Ram / Disk / sound card ..)?
The software works he correctly on this configuration?
What performance?
This software + hardware configuration is stable?
This is my girlfriend's laptop, on my old pc I'm afraid that it crashes, it uses a little sometimes ... his laptop is a HP Athlon XP 2600 with 256 MB of RAM and 40 GB HD, so the AC runs .......... is stable, I have had a few crashes though ... (O of the 8 / 10, it could be embarrassing live)
but try it on my old, using samples that can be ca can do
OVERALL OPINION
How long have you use it?
A week and a half
What is the particular feature you like best and least?
Most:
The automation geniales, super easy to achieve, the number of steps per measure easily configurable and allows for more rhythmic compositions shoots his cot lab that I like him, the audio engine (I find the sound better than fruity. ..), The Opportunities that I have not yet discovered
The -:
Some (very few) crashes
Interface confusing at first
the beta version does not "render to wave" good but just paste the vst "tape it" on the master track to find this function
the online manual and tutorials in English (if it knows or kelkun a forum that talks about Renoise ...)
No problem, not fifteen miles PARAMETERS files as in other software, buffer size ... style, very easy
Have you experienced any incompatibility?
Yes with samples of fruity loops, some wav files are not recognized, weird ... but with all my other samples ca rolls and so far most vst vsti and fx that I walk with him install the software even if it recognizes a vst or vsti, that is not fruity
Gnrale configuration is easy?
To pluto is a simple tracker even if it's still very confusing to write like that at the beginning
The manual is clear and sufficient? ...
no manual in the beta (the one that is so free), but by searching the net I found a few tutorials online and unfortunately in English ...
SUITABILITY/PERFORMANCE
What is the configuration of your computer? (Motherboard / CPU / Ram / Disk / sound card ..)?
The software works he correctly on this configuration?
What performance?
This software + hardware configuration is stable?
This is my girlfriend's laptop, on my old pc I'm afraid that it crashes, it uses a little sometimes ... his laptop is a HP Athlon XP 2600 with 256 MB of RAM and 40 GB HD, so the AC runs .......... is stable, I have had a few crashes though ... (O of the 8 / 10, it could be embarrassing live)
but try it on my old, using samples that can be ca can do
OVERALL OPINION
How long have you use it?
A week and a half
What is the particular feature you like best and least?
Most:
The automation geniales, super easy to achieve, the number of steps per measure easily configurable and allows for more rhythmic compositions shoots his cot lab that I like him, the audio engine (I find the sound better than fruity. ..), The Opportunities that I have not yet discovered
The -:
Some (very few) crashes
Interface confusing at first
the beta version does not "render to wave" good but just paste the vst "tape it" on the master track to find this function
the online manual and tutorials in English (if it knows or kelkun a forum that talks about Renoise ...)