View other reviews for this product:
ricoute
Published on 12/31/13 at 06:11
Made in japan
Type classical easel 3/5 springs
Till I saw some descriptive basswood or ash but alder priori conventionally, it seemed lighter than the PC 60's
Mapple handle (maple what!)
3 microphones priori Texas
1 volume 2 tone bass / treble
mic selector 5 positions
UTILIZATION
nice handle, normal freight not very jumbo varnish (there are small gray mottling not great aesthetic) it seems that it is plastic, but it is obviously not the case.
Head together and touch a little palot because we used a more ornage on vintage, varnish that there seems to be a natural white wood in a little pine
ergonomics is typical of a strat, but I was still confused, I do not know what this is due ... out of a 60's classic player
access to a standard strat so easily accessible
This is where the rub, let me explain.
Tried on a large combo amp, kustom sound seemed very good, with the comparison of the CP60's (which zozonnait not bad enough shiny, metallic), made me appreciate the other extreme because of the CP60's me came out a bit by luck!
After 1 test stealth and extended essay, I did not like!
The report is absolutely not in the rendering and slamming round is expected of a strat but still a very good sustain, even at a pinch a little suspect for each stratum.
The bass is a very good range but not warm and round not in the typical rendering, there is a medium level of fat honest and fairly short and quite paradoxically brilliant but not sharp crystal clear sound when you search take a strat on
SOUNDS
With systematic sustain, but a very good output level of micro, I can even make cruncher mo npetit marathon did not do with the PC's 60
But despite this high level of output these mics, there is no attack, and I confess that last test, after having tried different mics and positions of knobs she returned very quickly in its case, obviously this is NOT AT ALL THAT!!
Marathon carvin amps and V3m.
Initially, although the marathon respects the grain, I thought with the carvin it be anything else, but alas, it was the same finding of a total disappointment!
Or its bold (this is not a Lp) or crystalline sound that I would describe as any.
More strange is that with the distortion, I kept the same grain with the PC 60's here there is a little buzz species that modifies the grain loses homogeneity, can be e ncause sustain too systemtique not very natural (resonance ghost?).
So you will understand that there a nun so little blues / jazzy mic milia with a knob 7 and 4 severe acute making a nacceptable so, everything else very blah blah.!!
OVERALL OPINION
I had a week and I made!
I do not know if it's my copy in question was at issue or series (Tsunami!!) That is involved but in any case a very disappointing jap series are generally excellent alternatives and choice to us, but then a little over 700 € in nine of course, there has obviously a concern!
So R / Q / P / mediocre as take a PC eg. more typical and homogeneous.
No, I ESPECIALLY NOT remake this choice!
Type classical easel 3/5 springs
Till I saw some descriptive basswood or ash but alder priori conventionally, it seemed lighter than the PC 60's
Mapple handle (maple what!)
3 microphones priori Texas
1 volume 2 tone bass / treble
mic selector 5 positions
UTILIZATION
nice handle, normal freight not very jumbo varnish (there are small gray mottling not great aesthetic) it seems that it is plastic, but it is obviously not the case.
Head together and touch a little palot because we used a more ornage on vintage, varnish that there seems to be a natural white wood in a little pine
ergonomics is typical of a strat, but I was still confused, I do not know what this is due ... out of a 60's classic player
access to a standard strat so easily accessible
This is where the rub, let me explain.
Tried on a large combo amp, kustom sound seemed very good, with the comparison of the CP60's (which zozonnait not bad enough shiny, metallic), made me appreciate the other extreme because of the CP60's me came out a bit by luck!
After 1 test stealth and extended essay, I did not like!
The report is absolutely not in the rendering and slamming round is expected of a strat but still a very good sustain, even at a pinch a little suspect for each stratum.
The bass is a very good range but not warm and round not in the typical rendering, there is a medium level of fat honest and fairly short and quite paradoxically brilliant but not sharp crystal clear sound when you search take a strat on
SOUNDS
With systematic sustain, but a very good output level of micro, I can even make cruncher mo npetit marathon did not do with the PC's 60
But despite this high level of output these mics, there is no attack, and I confess that last test, after having tried different mics and positions of knobs she returned very quickly in its case, obviously this is NOT AT ALL THAT!!
Marathon carvin amps and V3m.
Initially, although the marathon respects the grain, I thought with the carvin it be anything else, but alas, it was the same finding of a total disappointment!
Or its bold (this is not a Lp) or crystalline sound that I would describe as any.
More strange is that with the distortion, I kept the same grain with the PC 60's here there is a little buzz species that modifies the grain loses homogeneity, can be e ncause sustain too systemtique not very natural (resonance ghost?).
So you will understand that there a nun so little blues / jazzy mic milia with a knob 7 and 4 severe acute making a nacceptable so, everything else very blah blah.!!
OVERALL OPINION
I had a week and I made!
I do not know if it's my copy in question was at issue or series (Tsunami!!) That is involved but in any case a very disappointing jap series are generally excellent alternatives and choice to us, but then a little over 700 € in nine of course, there has obviously a concern!
So R / Q / P / mediocre as take a PC eg. more typical and homogeneous.
No, I ESPECIALLY NOT remake this choice!