All user reviews for the Blue Sky MediaDesk 2.1

The system while a
I use it for my unquement as monitoring station computer music

SOUNDS

Rponse curve is linear with a rev prcis very serious. There is no problem for rgler the box (and god knows how I could galrer with caissons, all abandoned my way)

The sound is extremely prcis, rather surgical and out of the firebox presonus a little too steep my taste.

The dynamic is exellent if you do not push the volume too

OVERALL OPINION

I use it for three months and I am very happy (I am considering the move to kit 5.1)
I tried small Genelec and Tannoy Reveal and I & r prf blue sky
against by comparison with my stereo system (McIntosh 2205 + Tannoy Berkeley - coaxial 38) is cruel, the tannoy prcise but are just as much musical (with the blue sky I have a guitar signal perfectly equilibrated acoustic and with my tannoy sound of a guitar)

I think however that the report trs good quality price.

Speakers + subwoofer has motivated my choix.je for use solely in the mix of my songs.

SOUNDS

The frequency curve is great and the image stereo.le sound is crystal clear that I n "had never known avant.une superb dynamic condition does not push the son.ce is normal in any mix of interest push the technical specifications son.Quelles motivated your choice?

OVERALL OPINION

1mois.je since I have never heard a sound as precis.ce you hear the mix is ​​the same thing you find in your car or in your chain hifi.le subwoofer was not an addition it is part of all because all filters are in caisson.ce that does not for other marques.j have had a long history of MSP5 yamaha 8040 and has seen much genelec.rien superieur.les studio to luna states are equipped with these enceintes.cette trade mark is not known in France but I think it's the price Ref. no concurrency.

Small enough light monitors that could store his office, ideal size what? not too big not too small ...

SOUNDS

The sound .. need I say more .. it's heaven ... I could sound the écouters all day ... the sound is clear and not too low or too sharp .. you can adjust the sub accordingly ...

OVERALL OPINION

For $ 800 Canadian (because am from quebec) you have the subwoofer included ... it's not like the KRK 8 "rp-8 at the same price no sub ... not the whole kit for that price. .. fantastic!
with the posibility of 5.1 when I switch to a larger studio
it's perfect .... not need to buy two times ...

- Determines CHARACTERISTICS: Spectrum tense compactness of the satellites that make them easier fit than traditional Systm 2.0 in the same price range (prodipe & Company)
- Usage: VJing, computer music, electronic music and vocal beatbox
- My config: Macbook pro, sound card connects mindprint trio spdif mini jack plug on the internal adapter, headphones MDR-V6 Sony as one of REFERENCE "qualitquot, in terms of sound that I know (for compare the incomparable ...)

SOUNDS

- Neutral: My limited knowledge does not allow me to judge, this is my first Systm monitoring (APRS of old hifi HRIT forcment is so much more neutral
Stereo-Image: I sup the box to induce a blur in the bottom of the image spectrum in Stereo, but nyet, the human ear can only see the fire below 100Hz
- Precision: I'm in my room, not amnage consquence or treats, but a cost of proximity prsager leaves great potential for these monitors, no problem of phase or stationary waves, at least I do not jump to the ears
-Dynamic attacks slamming, no thundering other test I've ever monitor ... good note, I notice now the default mix, over the compression, reverb tail of the artifact OGG, WMA and MP3 as Describes some sites (but they do not affect that dynamics, Obviously).

OVERALL OPINION

-Duration of use: Since no more than a week, running PERIOD
'I like: the finish, despite the criticism or mixed lgrement dfavorable internet I find that Aesthetics is commonplace, dismal, but who cares ... I spend my time watch my box or my monitors. The main thing is the quality of the matrial, and they are well made, connections, heaters and other dtails are treated, we would have an AIM tlcommande or in- minus-one on / off switch on satellite (sucks to go under the desk to SAVE qq watts per year, every day).
Qualitprix-Report: Unbeatable ... you make the dub, electronics, or "better" hardtek hardcore, audiovisual (its image) in a system that the box of this price is a bargain.
- Repeat this choice? plutt twice a ...

PS: bought 500 euros on th * mann, fdp included

PS2: this opinion is that of a beginners in the computer music (less than a year) but still mlomane and musician, not audiophile (who cares ?)...

The award does THE FIRST motivation. Thomann 500 shipping included for a system that 2.1, is theft ... But in a good way ^ ^

I was looking for a system that flat (as usual), which does not bleed in the lower mdiums like so many others, that is truly Fidler in restitution and that allows me to find my mix across .

I work at home in my room, dim = 4 * 3 * 3m (hot, hot trs).
The placement of the sub is quite dlicat couraging, as always in the end, but it is well worth the effort. To get the best, I urge you to avoid the traditional home studio configs, ie against the wall. Conversely, if you can, you put 2-3 meters of the wall, with the sub in the face, pressed against the wall.

Note that Bluesky provides a lot of doc on its website to help with good positioning of the gear.

SOUNDS

The curve frequency drives ad is always idyllic my mind on paper. APRS, say it is Systm ultra flat, I would be quite incapable, as the acoustics at home is terrible. However, I really want to say that yes, the Medidesk is one of the flat I've had the opportunity to test. First thanks the absence of bass reflex. The coupling box satellite is underway. No abusive frequency drives, particularly down mdiums pushed back to me in many MODELS.

Stereo image is large trs, trs prcise. I could fault this Systm not have enough momentum. In my case, I verifies the CRITERIA on my headphone (a SONY MDR 7506). Some dtails tend not to be put forward enough, but I'm not that much of PRTSR my sound (2.5 sec in the 2-frisette 3kz, hell ).

OVERALL OPINION

I have this Systm since late January.

I prfre is its ability to reproduce the spectral balance of my mix. I found the same thing (apart from each Systm inhrentes colors, of course) everywhere, and that's exactly what I wanted, especially for a price as drisoire. It is very practical to enhance the timbre of different instruments, and make a mix that will enhance your components. To the real mix, I would advise however plutt throw an ear on his great ERRF the Prodesk (APRS costs far sr ^ ^).

The dynamic range is less tense than on other Systmes (OBS Far instance, or BM 6A), but it is quite difficult I think to work effectively on this CRITERIA without at least two costs Different.

I test a lot of stuff before buying, ie, Fostex PM1, the Genelec 1029, FAR OBS, the ADAM (I remember the MODEL c'tait but the input e-end), the Alesis, and still others a few years. I do not regret my choice. We must lend an ear to make a good mix, but trs honntement, they are of a report-quality unbeatable price. For that price, it seems to me difficult to get better.

Update of 06/07/08: This is actually Systm trs reliable, insofar as I find the balance and color of the mix on all points Coutes tested. However, they sound trs neutral and s'quiper of a system that will parallle hifi in the icing on the gteau.