CDX4 classified ad
New ad alertImages
Reviews
4.0/5(2 reviews)
100 %
Write a user review
maitre corbeaucdx4
Published on 11/01/12 at 03:34 (This content has been automatically translated from French)my cdj 100s are doing very, very old they had to be replaced, use only animation.
So no pio pio or denon ...... useless, I needed a simple, practical and reliable, if possible.
my choice is focused on CDX4 (I had already CDX6 4) included two rules in my animation (each have 2 CDX6 which controls a PC and thus 2 CDX4 for CD, it has been turned all is well I said ......... bravo.
Price / quality ratio impeccable, okay look is a little "old school" but other than that .... no problemo.
I precise although the use is for entertainment, for sharp mix it need something else. (Personal is 2 and 2 CDJ 900 CDJ 1000 MK3) …
So no pio pio or denon ...... useless, I needed a simple, practical and reliable, if possible.
my choice is focused on CDX4 (I had already CDX6 4) included two rules in my animation (each have 2 CDX6 which controls a PC and thus 2 CDX4 for CD, it has been turned all is well I said ......... bravo.
Price / quality ratio impeccable, okay look is a little "old school" but other than that .... no problemo.
I precise although the use is for entertainment, for sharp mix it need something else. (Personal is 2 and 2 CDJ 900 CDJ 1000 MK3) …
Read more
my cdj 100s are doing very, very old they had to be replaced, use only animation.
So no pio pio or denon ...... useless, I needed a simple, practical and reliable, if possible.
my choice is focused on CDX4 (I had already CDX6 4) included two rules in my animation (each have 2 CDX6 which controls a PC and thus 2 CDX4 for CD, it has been turned all is well I said ......... bravo.
Price / quality ratio impeccable, okay look is a little "old school" but other than that .... no problemo.
I precise although the use is for entertainment, for sharp mix it need something else. (Personal is 2 and 2 CDJ 900 CDJ 1000 MK3)
So no pio pio or denon ...... useless, I needed a simple, practical and reliable, if possible.
my choice is focused on CDX4 (I had already CDX6 4) included two rules in my animation (each have 2 CDX6 which controls a PC and thus 2 CDX4 for CD, it has been turned all is well I said ......... bravo.
Price / quality ratio impeccable, okay look is a little "old school" but other than that .... no problemo.
I precise although the use is for entertainment, for sharp mix it need something else. (Personal is 2 and 2 CDJ 900 CDJ 1000 MK3)
See less
20
»
blexCorrect
Published on 08/20/12 at 13:40 (This content has been automatically translated from French)I use it for 1 year now (and dust).
Yes, I try Pioneer CDJ 400 (I think).
It is true that Audiophony Pioneer and have nothing to do.
The +
The pitch, the USB port, the LED screen and cue points.
The -
Jog too sensitive for my taste.
Effect disgusting.
And BPM that goes awry.
Price / quality ratio, I metterai 7/10, if I had to change, I will try to controllers.
Yes, I try Pioneer CDJ 400 (I think).
It is true that Audiophony Pioneer and have nothing to do.
The +
The pitch, the USB port, the LED screen and cue points.
The -
Jog too sensitive for my taste.
Effect disgusting.
And BPM that goes awry.
Price / quality ratio, I metterai 7/10, if I had to change, I will try to controllers.
00
»
Tech. sheet
- Manufacturer: Audiophony
- Model: CDX4
- Category: Tabletop DJ players
- Added in our database on: 03/27/2011
We have no technical specifications for this product
but your help will be much welcomed
»
Manuals and other files
Other categories in DJ CD Players
Other names: cdx 4, cdx4