Used for quite some time with a DJM 600, I used a lot of other models from other brand and product lines.
Cheap Used they can establish a board-level pro (fontionne capable of long and reliable). The qualities of reading Pioneer are above the average for other brands even for CDJ 100.
Very good understanding and usability of commands in a mix of basic pitch, fast loading CD, ACCURATE and so instinctive. Good big square buttons that do not loupent (not like the CDJ 200 or 800par example). Extremely solid and reliable, a real tank. Do not fear (or less than others) to work outdoors in conditions dificiles. Works well and benefits from BPM starts with some missing Mix Piopio. They will, for example the plates of the beginner, amateur or discomobile bug who wants to work without jumping or hard after three nights (it's not Ge ... or Nu .... etc.).
The least? We will not blame him she did not ... (BPM, MP3, effects) It's obvious that he prefers a 200 if you do not mix that has a BPM or if you want to play MP3
Value unbeatable bargain price, but testing with a bad CD and the starts. In nine, it is true that with such a small price difference it is better to take CDJ 200.
I have and I keep them and there are better but more expensive ...