All user reviews of 4/5 for the Pioneer CDJ-200

It's been 3 months that I mix on Pioneer cdj 200 and I'm pretty happy.

First, it is beautiful at night as during the day. The many features are: auto-cue, three effects, precise pitch, seamless loop, master tempo and more. However, the grip is not easy at the pitch and jog lorqu'on particular is used to mix with another plate, unlike a CDJ800 or cdj 1000.
In summary, this is a perfect stage for home given its size, its price (480 €) and its functions, but rather turn to the cdj 800 if you have a large budget.

- How long have you use it?

3 months

- What is the particular feature you like best and least?

the most:
- Price
- Strong enough (she got a glass of whiskey / coke on the jog, Demonte, netoye, it works nickel)
Cons:
- The jog, I prefer to jog larger than can be used laterally (CDJ800-1000, stanton C304)
- The pitch a little too sensitive
- Does not play mp3 vbr

- Have you tried many other models before acqurir?

I had the opportunity to try the CDJ1000 before, but I can not afford ...
I also tried the dns1000, I think it looks a little too playmobil ...
- How do you report qualitprix?

very good, it is efficient, robust. what more

- With the exprience, you do again this choice?

with my financial means, yes
with a little more than average, I look more for CDJ800, the big jog is more pleasant.
see CDJ1000, analysis of the spectrum is very useful when playing a song that plays only very rarely.

I had the opportunity and this, repeatedly use the cdj 800 and 1000.
I plan to buy trs ending for the readers.
Them 800: features are excellent. The HIC: Enormment people around me have had technical problem (lentils).
Them in 1000: a really good product trs. The catch: the price is exorbitant!
I look at the 200, APRS advice of a provider ...
I have utiliss lous and have a night.
functions are sduisante: A dpart / 3 stop instant effect small friendly and efficient, ds perfect loops, a design pro, a time display / clear functions.
The HIC: 4H APRS operation and continued use, readers Begus: more ways to play any cd .. I have dyed ... 1 time OK, 2fois No. I find out my old gemini readers in order to complete the evening. Is it a "bad luck"? I do not really know. Still, I t EMBT.

I use the cdj 200 for 1year
quality price ratio there is no picture (then 2008) it has the geule it is reliable and robust I made two nights a week in the pub I take them everywhere is filed ect ect niquel it work!
I love the quality and ergonomics pioneer the master tempo! loops and of course the effects piopio when no table pioneer! I also like its size small and slight costaut!
I like the least manual loops! gallery live but if done! jog too sensitive with respect to the 800 but the advantage is good when you mix on 800 or 1000 is too easy
vbr mp3 in the folder you can not put your cue and not the title of the song.
nival prices in 2007/08 they were a num now the 499th is too expensive is better to take the 400 to 100th over.

no I will not go to choice even if the 200 is very very good but having to buy a DJM600 effects I use most and for the price I will take 800 opportunities for self-loops and vinyl jog! even if I technics mk2 but I admit that the 800 is very convenient while you have vinyl / cd because every time 30kilo vinyl plus 2 plus technics cdj 200 djm 600 ppppffffff plus 2 times a week between room car ect .... it sucks!

I use it for over 2 years.
I had a numark axis 8 and a DNS-3000 before.

The +:
buckles to the tempo.
Cue reactivity and touched very nice button.
Reading Recovery to the point she was in error ejection.

the -:
BPM counter that is useless as the CDJ throughout the world ... I do not even include those who mix with, there is not even a decimal point when the pitch yes.
Not reading MP3 cds if the tracks are encoded in VBR.
No opportunity to mix with cd timecoded because they have no option scratch.
Fair value for money, if you stretch a budget head for higher models.

For how long have you been using it?
The boards I bought used three months ago, a pair for 400 € (yes, negotiated). They were 3 years when I have bought, so they have 3 years and 3 months. I use them for 3 months.

Did you try many other models before getting this one?
I did some evenings with CDJ400, 800, 1000 and 2000. So yes, I tested quite a few models before, but ... Not in the same price range.

What thing do you like most/least about it?
Pros: quality is just extra! Impeccable. The same accuracy is exceptional.
Cons: Compared to the price, there is none. It regrets the fact that loops can not last a maximum of 4 times, lack of hot cues (but we will not ask anything either), and the fact that you can not save loops in advance.

What is your opinion about the value for the price?
Nothing to say, great value for money! (When I say that's because I paid 400 € the pair ...).
Knowing what you know now, would you make the same choice? ...
For the price I had, yes. For what it is not. We can not have much "play" with the music. It remains in the mix easy. (We are forced to learn our songs by heart without hot cues: p). But the product is exceptional. Quality pioneer ...