Pioneer CDJ-350

I have been using for 2 years and a half.
Before I had the cdj 400 and I had a lot of different decks in the club where I worked: cdj 500 cdj 100s cdj 800 cdj 1000, etc ...

what I like most is the compact size for travel across various delivery, and playback from USB key. Least is the lack of effect compared to cdj 400 and auto loop function.
It is on this choice I would as excellent value for money.

I use it for 2 years

Before, I had CDJ 100 S

What I like the most, their look, their small size, easily transportable wheel "toothed", accuracy, robustness, support usb and simple navigation between folder and titles.

What I like least, not much, maybe the fact that there was no effect, yet cdj 100 s first generation had 3 effects, cdj 400 also, the manufacturer's choice a bit disappointing.

The value for money is always in the same pioneer, it's expensive! The quality is there, then we have to accept ...

I use it for two days (Friday and delivered the first Saturday evening). I tried many decks before I decide for the ones. My colleague with the 2000 the choice was difficult to not be disappointed because I usually work with its governance.

Frankly I'm not disappointed on the contrary I am very pleasantly surprised, the deck responds really well, nothing superfluous, everything is at hand.
Concerning the management of removable media nothing to say, when everything happened in rekordbox, research of its securities is a breeze.

The bpm is pretty decent, but nothing better than to rely on the ear ....
The mix cd is also easy, charging is fast enough, and all functions comply with a quarter turn.

Divide the function loop is really great, but use sparingly ....

Associated with my RMC 55 I'm having. I would do this choice without hesitation.

The value for money is OK, as always pioneer is expensive, but the product is really well done.