View other reviews for this product:
Dj Xs
Published on 01/20/08 at 14:37
Value For Money :
Excellent
Hi all: a little feedback on the CDJ400?
then here:
I've had it for 3 days;
Do j'aprécie most:
-Very incisive: a prssion net and his party as dry / denon home but also with espève rubber on most keys I lose sensitivity.
to say I have a left and right stanton C304 CDJ400's.
-His tail, his "strength (the time will tell), its buttons.
Speed-the "read head '
"I always said that I did not scratch but I've discovered that it was very easy (on the concept trasition any con).
It must: I put a loop on rnb approx 100 bpm, I Shrunk the fly and I find myself in electronics to 134 Bpm.
-This is also a question. critics say that the mk3 has the advantage to save the cue. But when I put marte memory card on pc least, I have a folder with PIONEER "cue". I understand it? mk3 => 400 => mk3
What I like the least:
-The display BPM does not even vigules. is 128 or 129, the rest ... you démerder. Fortunately that mix with the ears.
-Having to juggle between effect and pitch.
-If it plays audio CDs, and mp3 to usb: Why can not we play a song wav via usb.
"I had tried my bah dns 3500, the cdj800mk1, and just for a good mk3 1/2heure before I cdj .....
I found of a very good price / quality ratio. what, you tell me?
I make it short:
Stanton bought a C304 in the United States to 400 euros there 2 years ...
AN denon dns 3500 bought in France there are 800 to 1 year and a half ....
A Cdj 400 acquired in France.
if I take into account changing market and dates: Only the stanton who left me on my hunger.
I would do without hesitation that choice, I just take a second ...
Finally,
A tiny platinum (did you want to Triballi everywhere), incisive, and a SimpliCTI disconcerting for me .... beyond a MK3.ceci said proportion of time spent on both.
cdt, XS
then here:
I've had it for 3 days;
Do j'aprécie most:
-Very incisive: a prssion net and his party as dry / denon home but also with espève rubber on most keys I lose sensitivity.
to say I have a left and right stanton C304 CDJ400's.
-His tail, his "strength (the time will tell), its buttons.
Speed-the "read head '
"I always said that I did not scratch but I've discovered that it was very easy (on the concept trasition any con).
It must: I put a loop on rnb approx 100 bpm, I Shrunk the fly and I find myself in electronics to 134 Bpm.
-This is also a question. critics say that the mk3 has the advantage to save the cue. But when I put marte memory card on pc least, I have a folder with PIONEER "cue". I understand it? mk3 => 400 => mk3
What I like the least:
-The display BPM does not even vigules. is 128 or 129, the rest ... you démerder. Fortunately that mix with the ears.
-Having to juggle between effect and pitch.
-If it plays audio CDs, and mp3 to usb: Why can not we play a song wav via usb.
"I had tried my bah dns 3500, the cdj800mk1, and just for a good mk3 1/2heure before I cdj .....
I found of a very good price / quality ratio. what, you tell me?
I make it short:
Stanton bought a C304 in the United States to 400 euros there 2 years ...
AN denon dns 3500 bought in France there are 800 to 1 year and a half ....
A Cdj 400 acquired in France.
if I take into account changing market and dates: Only the stanton who left me on my hunger.
I would do without hesitation that choice, I just take a second ...
Finally,
A tiny platinum (did you want to Triballi everywhere), incisive, and a SimpliCTI disconcerting for me .... beyond a MK3.ceci said proportion of time spent on both.
cdt, XS