View other reviews for this product:
innocent.moon
Published on 04/25/08 at 08:11
Marshall 100W lamps above the only effect is a reverb (this is not a multi purpose I wanted ...)
(What you want to note as a description?! Go as it is I who have described I will put a note, it goes back my average!)
UTILIZATION
The config? you can not get any easier! TREB pressure med bass gain volume for good sound it took me about 5 minutes, as long as the amp heats ...
my old amp was a warhead (very well too) and there's more crap bcp to settle for having the sound you're looking for ... the manual? There's a manual? I've had in the ass while OCCAZ the manual, but I do not see what he could tell me beautiful ... ^ ^ I'll have to ask ...
with respect to the rest of his ca marshall's, must love
SOUNDS
It has completely agree that I play, I come from the metal and I'm starting to lean towards hard rock with blues trends ... then yes of course that pete ca ^ ^
I played with a Washburn Dime at the moment and in a few days a Gibson Les Paul (it should do so I think)
What types of sound I get? in clean ... of clean, crunch on ... crunch (her cunt or what?) nan seriously but the gain is fat crunch of the guitar growls manierre very pleasant, and even with distortion the sound is precise is impecable
Rectif - Gibson was the shit, It sounded good but it's a shovel, ca ergonomic all this, I play the same apli a Dean with SH13 and SH1 in acute 59 'in serious It sounds really cool ^ ^
OVERALL OPINION
So long ago I had a marshall AVT 100, it was a disappointment because I was playing metal, the gain was still at the bottom which resulted in an impressive breath, I opted for the Randall Warhead, but too complex to settle for me ^ ^ and the sound is very cold and synthetic ... The Marshall 2000 is impecable I play it for a month, what I like most about it is the sound it gives off no matter the channel ... I like the least? his face, I find it too bad a marshall j'aimme bcp the aesthetical There's so Randall's compare is not the same kind ... (After you like it or not ^ ^)
value for money? I got a € 900 so I think it's impecable and I would do without this choice hesitate with the experience (I put nine because it is damn ugly!)
(What you want to note as a description?! Go as it is I who have described I will put a note, it goes back my average!)
UTILIZATION
The config? you can not get any easier! TREB pressure med bass gain volume for good sound it took me about 5 minutes, as long as the amp heats ...
my old amp was a warhead (very well too) and there's more crap bcp to settle for having the sound you're looking for ... the manual? There's a manual? I've had in the ass while OCCAZ the manual, but I do not see what he could tell me beautiful ... ^ ^ I'll have to ask ...
with respect to the rest of his ca marshall's, must love
SOUNDS
It has completely agree that I play, I come from the metal and I'm starting to lean towards hard rock with blues trends ... then yes of course that pete ca ^ ^
I played with a Washburn Dime at the moment and in a few days a Gibson Les Paul (it should do so I think)
What types of sound I get? in clean ... of clean, crunch on ... crunch (her cunt or what?) nan seriously but the gain is fat crunch of the guitar growls manierre very pleasant, and even with distortion the sound is precise is impecable
Rectif - Gibson was the shit, It sounded good but it's a shovel, ca ergonomic all this, I play the same apli a Dean with SH13 and SH1 in acute 59 'in serious It sounds really cool ^ ^
OVERALL OPINION
So long ago I had a marshall AVT 100, it was a disappointment because I was playing metal, the gain was still at the bottom which resulted in an impressive breath, I opted for the Randall Warhead, but too complex to settle for me ^ ^ and the sound is very cold and synthetic ... The Marshall 2000 is impecable I play it for a month, what I like most about it is the sound it gives off no matter the channel ... I like the least? his face, I find it too bad a marshall j'aimme bcp the aesthetical There's so Randall's compare is not the same kind ... (After you like it or not ^ ^)
value for money? I got a € 900 so I think it's impecable and I would do without this choice hesitate with the experience (I put nine because it is damn ugly!)