ganesha
Note : 6 sur 10
« NOT BAD »
Published on 12/08/11 at 05:131 week test
I tested the VCI 300 before,
The controls are well thought out, there are not too much just enough (4 cues / 4 samples / 4 fx / a filter - for platinum) The front and the controls seem well made (the faders seem resistant, cue and play buttons are plastic)
My only complaint is the quality of plastic used for the bottom white box (the connection between the facade and the bottom box is poor: it is possible to gently remove the two structures just with the thumb)
value for money would be more accurate on a base of 300 euros seen the plastic used ...
On the other hand the software virtual dj is just enough for recreational use but not pro, and even playful in the analysis for the autosync does not work every time.
We would have preferred to see an identical surface with a smaller case stronger. I recommend putting it in a fly! conclusion I will not sell my and my CDJ1000 DJM800 for the world: DDD IS A GADGET ERGO quite expensive, very much a more solid!
I tested the VCI 300 before,
The controls are well thought out, there are not too much just enough (4 cues / 4 samples / 4 fx / a filter - for platinum) The front and the controls seem well made (the faders seem resistant, cue and play buttons are plastic)
My only complaint is the quality of plastic used for the bottom white box (the connection between the facade and the bottom box is poor: it is possible to gently remove the two structures just with the thumb)
value for money would be more accurate on a base of 300 euros seen the plastic used ...
On the other hand the software virtual dj is just enough for recreational use but not pro, and even playful in the analysis for the autosync does not work every time.
We would have preferred to see an identical surface with a smaller case stronger. I recommend putting it in a fly! conclusion I will not sell my and my CDJ1000 DJM800 for the world: DDD IS A GADGET ERGO quite expensive, very much a more solid!