Log in
Log in

or
Create an account

or
< All Washburn Dime 333 reviews
Add this product to
  • My former gear
  • My current gear
  • My wishlist
Washburn Dime 333
Images
1/49
Washburn Dime 333
Price engine
Classified Ads
Forums
Pucelle_Dabidjan Pucelle_Dabidjan
Published on 12/15/08 at 05:52
<p class="bbcode-offtopic"> Off topic: <span>I hate to re-register an opinion on an instrument. Especially when I have not been advised of the removal of my old opinions and causes surrounding the moderation of the article. Thus I re-write, but the quality of the latter will be a rush, I warn you.</span>

Objective approach:

Alder guitar with flamed maple top, fitted with microphones and flanked by a washburn floyd rose.



Subjective approach:

Nice guitar with a nice finish.

(8) it looks pretty good.

UTILIZATION

The handle is bland, tasteless, even if it is simple. The frets are well applied, the Floyd Rose equipped guitar this is crap and no tune-ever, impossible to lock the strings properly for a long time. The knobs are not very progressive, the microphones have a flat sound. Get a good sound is difficult. Access to treble is good.

(3) yeah, not great but just okay.

SOUNDS

It will be a fan. I found a flat with nothing really special. A vacuum, however, the guitar is not bad. There's a fever present, but with something wrapped in motivating to play. Once plugged into the clean tape slightly, the sixth string buzz and distortion the sound is a little mess. The use of the floyd tune still together.

(3) if I compare to other guitars in this segment is not famous, if I compare all the competing possible, it's downright pathetic.

OVERALL OPINION

As mentioned above. Used a few weeks and then sold to a guy who finds it very well. I think we need to be a fan, but for me it was a very average guitar.

(1) you not fuck with it.

<p class="bbcode-offtopic"> Off topic: <span>My first opinion was much more fleshed out, but I do not live for AF, so you will be satisfied</span>