View other reviews for this product:
tontongaston
Published on 05/18/09 at 20:22
- How long have you use it?
Use for over a month on a Macbook Pro 17 pouces.Le software does not suffer too much the machine.
- What is the particular feature you like best and least?
First, you realize one thing with the best product versions East-West: installation time ... So of course we brle impatient to test his new "toy" in esprant not be of. Positive thing, installation, although long (this is normal given the hundreds of Giga Bytes per piano), has made no final problme.Au is batitude couraging with the software is the height of the long installation process!
In addition, the handling is very simple, the software looks at the full possibilities of a joint rel piano.L game interface is also the enjoyable trs eye.
- Have you tried many other models before acqurir?
I had the chance to try and Akoustik Piano Pianoteq. The pianos on offer are the same, yet they do not have the same depth, precision and the Quantum Leap Pianos ism of East-West ... However, these programs are Allg more, this surely will delight those who prfrent a good product for a proving too hard!
- How do you report qualitprix?
It is true that it is more expensive than others on the marchmais must perspective, first of all, the sound quality is irrprochable (with, for example, notes and rptition 'Sampling of a real staccato, to name a few). Then, with hindsight, if we want to obtain beautiful piano sounds, all to bring a true, of course, it is not given. This product, I believe, is more than reasonable Contents qualitprix report.
- With the exprience, you do again this choice? ...
It is indniable I would do this to me more choices than convaincu.J 've even been jealous of this product! Many of my collgues ingnieurs musicians and sound have Akoustik Piano tend turn to QLP indniable ... It is my opinion that this jewel made in East-West, many people will agree. I recommend that you cost the DMOS site of East West ( http://www.soundsonline.com/product.php?productid=EW-171 ) , so that you can you account for the "monstrous" t work that has provided, and will agree to many.
Use for over a month on a Macbook Pro 17 pouces.Le software does not suffer too much the machine.
- What is the particular feature you like best and least?
First, you realize one thing with the best product versions East-West: installation time ... So of course we brle impatient to test his new "toy" in esprant not be of. Positive thing, installation, although long (this is normal given the hundreds of Giga Bytes per piano), has made no final problme.Au is batitude couraging with the software is the height of the long installation process!
In addition, the handling is very simple, the software looks at the full possibilities of a joint rel piano.L game interface is also the enjoyable trs eye.
- Have you tried many other models before acqurir?
I had the chance to try and Akoustik Piano Pianoteq. The pianos on offer are the same, yet they do not have the same depth, precision and the Quantum Leap Pianos ism of East-West ... However, these programs are Allg more, this surely will delight those who prfrent a good product for a proving too hard!
- How do you report qualitprix?
It is true that it is more expensive than others on the marchmais must perspective, first of all, the sound quality is irrprochable (with, for example, notes and rptition 'Sampling of a real staccato, to name a few). Then, with hindsight, if we want to obtain beautiful piano sounds, all to bring a true, of course, it is not given. This product, I believe, is more than reasonable Contents qualitprix report.
- With the exprience, you do again this choice? ...
It is indniable I would do this to me more choices than convaincu.J 've even been jealous of this product! Many of my collgues ingnieurs musicians and sound have Akoustik Piano tend turn to QLP indniable ... It is my opinion that this jewel made in East-West, many people will agree. I recommend that you cost the DMOS site of East West ( http://www.soundsonline.com/product.php?productid=EW-171 ) , so that you can you account for the "monstrous" t work that has provided, and will agree to many.