All user reviews for the Behringer DJX700

4-way BPM counter, a forty effects always kind, cut (almost) complete low / mid / high: it has the same functions, so, a djm 500 or 600 of pioneer.

UTILIZATION

Setup is simple and accessible and the table is asssez easy to use.

SOUNDS

The sound is simply bad (bad distribution of sounds, some percussive bass, treble too ... As soon as we pushed a little pouuse master volume, short of breath means ... not good ...

OVERALL OPINION

I have been using one and a half years ...
What I like most about it, it is the 4 channels for only € 199 ...
THE DJX 700 mixer is correct: 4 channels, effects, BPM counter, ...
Effects and the sound is not terrible and should not rely on the bpm counter (but not too serious because I mix the tempo with the ears). But this table is only € 199 value correcte.Je would do so this election with an even budjet of € 200 ...

Here I use the jewelry there are over 3 months now
I find the perfect equalizer certe pa-it is infinite but hey
potentiometers are bad pa
the crossfader is AWESOME !!!!! I live with
Indeed the effect they are highly efficient pa since the sound is just rotten when you actually use, but if there are 3 or 4 pa mal only that I find useful if you want an effect section vo better buy a good cheap pioneer efx of the envoir ca
as a rule I find this mixer all just impeccable sense eSite I'll take to make the evening so beginners go ahead with eyes closed jy is 9 / 10 because jprefere pioneer lollll
Dj-LaBombe

UTILIZATION

Top

SOUNDS

Perspective it remains sound in the race if they have good baff baff psk with other it does not fit

OVERALL OPINION

Most
integrated effect
sound
ergonomics
cross
les-
the knob
Kill
light (c better when it's heavy)
BPM purchased principally made 'em to ca one can say just that troubleshoots EM ca pa too good fo count on the bpm counter is at Chi.!

A box is effective but has not used much. There are two effects can be used that's all.

UTILIZATION

Mixer very easy to use!

SOUNDS

Many of breath is a shame.
The equalizer is great! But the faders makes sound just limit not great.

OVERALL OPINION

I use it for a year.
I had no problem with using a fairly regulire.
Report 200 quality excellent price!
I just bought a Numark 5000FX and the comparison is trs net!! But I would recommend this table mix for beginners as I did.

See below.

UTILIZATION

See below

SOUNDS

See below

OVERALL OPINION

In short, this table is great for those seeking to small budgets.Le complet.le manual is very value for money is excellent.
I would do this choice with his eyes closed but I sell more because I do not see the usefulness.

http://cgi.ebay.fr/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&rd=1&item=180130113061&ssPageName=STRK:MESE:IT&ih=008

It is a mixer that reflte the Money (for 200euros do not CHARACTERISTICS s'tonner of) the multi-effect for me is not of good quality in terms of sound but also sync from the tempo.Les faders are fragile, and the pramplis (gain) of this table are of poor quality. If not for the price we must admit that it is not so bad has!

UTILIZATION

The manual is clear, the mixer is easy to use. All functions are very easy to use.

SOUNDS

The console introduced many of breath if you push the master-General for the table above 8. The pramplis should not be too pousss as if the table gnre even more breath. The eq is not that evils that a. For the multi-effect against the sound is mdiocre.

OVERALL OPINION

I have been prt, I use it extensively for 2 months (wedding, evening, etc ...) I do not recommend for someone who will use it extensively but for someone one that beginners who want a cheap table it should.

I bought this mixer May 19, 2007, the effects work well, the qualiseur also faders too, but this mixer poses problem.
When the active master means a heavy breath, like the sound of the electric voltage.
Reading the manual is not clear how to assign a path prcoute SPECIFICATIONS, explanations that are more restricted.
When you connect a CD player sometimes we may well follow the instruction that the BPM counter displays a value duly!
The song In Love With David Guetta will Myselfde 280 bpm for example then what is going to ke ... 110 bpm
SPEED slide faders too, practical mix of hiphop and make a scratch parrallle platinum cd or vinyl, but for the transitions trance techno dance house, easy not easy, since ke transitions have to be slower ...

220 for the next time I reflchirais

DENIS

UTILIZATION

Simple configuration gnrale
normal function quickly and easily accessible
clear enough for manual connections and rglages
except prcoute

SOUNDS

Transparent to use, lol not at all on prcoute, apart from her, so good
yes it introduces the breath
qualizeur trs good quality

OVERALL OPINION

I use it since May 19, 2007
positive and has ngatifs see above comment
(I've never tried before MODELS, but I know enough to say that the ratio quality price is way, way trs).
I would do not elect

I use this machine to mix the vinyl, soon I will invest the ds Skud time codes.
This machine is complete for beginners (4 channels (including 3 phono), an effect between an output micro ...)

UTILIZATION

Everything is clear except the use of effects, the book must be in a cot to find the effect DSIR ...
This machine bug it happened to me after a power cut but it just me ... and the bpm is irrelevant ...
The faders are stable but fragile parraissent (apparently after I do not know if they really are ....) and especially the cross are too small (c many large faders to control precisely the sound ...).

SOUNDS

Frankly I find the sound very clear, I was partying with the ziq it goes all up!
The sound is really perfect contrast as some say ...

"When I hear the sound is loud, there's every breath and it made me Rigol ... This table does not generate qd breath unless you push the master above 8 and beyond ca outlaw ... if not the stuff that generates that's all ... "

Equaliser effective (- 32db / +12 db).
The kills are not evil =).

OVERALL OPINION

I use it for one month, will I like most is the price and number of channels and quality sound!

The least: the effects but can connect a generator to effect such KORG so it is the same qd; =)

report quality price / top (I saw a less than 175E)

I would do this choice? so if I do that and 200E can be no more if I had to (I saw such a numark 400E which has the area of ​​card fx5000 ... I think after the above should be addressed. ..).

No rack? so what?
5 ways?
RCA and XLR (for micro eh!)
eq not paramtrique
effect section intgre

UTILIZATION

Configuration? OK! Everything is very simple!
familiar terms, but the manual is clear and sufficient as the habit of BEHRINGER

SOUNDS

It is the only I grew my word, it is certain that we take for 200 not too likely to say (when you want to impersonate a ing his junior) that the sound is "not great "" too sharp "and so on. I think the sound is gnial, the bass is very round, what some people say the medium and treble parraissent trs correct me, and I have all this cost without correction or kill many on! So if nothing Toche, cdj trs well!
again, I found the box effects trs friendly and intuitive, it was not OK presets, nothing prevents the assets on a sheet printed cot Ah yes! c true! AC requires a minimum of organization and discipline DSOL ...
and the sound effects I found it!

OVERALL OPINION

Long enough to have an opinion
I like the higher the price! My least favorite BPM counters that even with bocou dynamics are a little to the street ... shame! (C easy yet in an electronic BPM ULI!)
I tried the gemini, the img, the pioneer, other behringer, among others.
quality price ratio? that will not agree?
I reffer this choice, more ways than one!

No rack but I'm not interested
4 channels + 1 micro
while RCA and XLR for mic
parametric equalizer is not
yes and j'la is pretty cool

UTILIZATION

Very easy to use
the only thing interesting in the manual is a list of effect

SOUNDS

Very good sonoritbr /> but I do not like too much of the EQ knobs

OVERALL OPINION

About 1 year of use
I like the effects
the DX626, just no ...
very good value qualitprix
yes

Non-grae rack but the edge can be built the same right.
-Enough of ways to use DJ.
-XLR and RCA
-The effects are incredible but they let themselves be used from time to time

UTILIZATION

-The configuration is the same as the tables diffrent DJ
-I have not read the manual

SOUNDS

-The console is virtually transparent in sound ... Finally it is my opinion ...

OVERALL OPINION

-It has been ending for a year I work on it.
-The good crossfather and particulirement
Good-qualitprix
And I would do the same choice

In short, my opinion is gnrale it's a good mixer almost like the pioneer.

Not a nice rack, but use two simple CD player.

UTILIZATION

The opinions donns prcdement gives a good picture of the table.

I would add that there is indeed a breath when the master is back.

Also be aware, for those who intends to use it in marriage or what type of night that the microphone no sound booth on the output. pity for those who wanted to use an amp deuxime!

Otherwise the table is trs intuitive and enjoyable to use.

SOUNDS

It's been two years since I use this table and I hear a breath when the master is thoroughly ...

OVERALL OPINION

Good food that I use for two years.

the -
I also have a problem of the master linares but my table starts to get old ...
The problem of micro also is quite annoying at least for my use

the +
Enjoyable to use
good price quality ratio

Have you tried many other models before acqurir?
I try two table Gmini I can not remember the references. I bought this table in tips.

Exprience with, you will do again this choice?
Not because this table does not quite my needs. But if I can not find a table best fits what I want, I will turn to the table!

Is Rack?
not

And what type of connection?
RCA and XLR microphone. Too bad the left or only RCA

UTILIZATION

The general configuration is it simple?
As the model Pioneer copy, it can be.

The usual functions are they easily accessible?
The effects application to have the manual handy ...

The manual is clear and sufficient?
TRANSPARENT

SOUNDS

She introduced the breath?
Personally, I mix a + / -0 dB, the table does not breath at this level.

The equalizer is effective?
Yes, I had the opportunity to mix with the DJM 600 (Pioneer), and I confess it was not comfortable with the equalizer, that of the DJX 700 is perfect for me, a little more for the very apreciate to Kill some way.

OVERALL OPINION

Since Comben time you use it?
1 week

What is so special that you love the most, the least?
+ ... looks 100% Pioneer (ergonomics, usual)
-... faders seems fragile at best.

Have you tried many models before buying it?
DJM-600
DJM-800
NUO-2
NUO-5
UMX-ES 3-way

How would you rate the quality / price?
more than well, for 160 euros (new), I'm really pleased with this table.

With experience, you do again nd choice?
For now, yes, (and more than attractive price)

.

UTILIZATION

.

SOUNDS

.

OVERALL OPINION

This is my first table, and my impression is that more mixed. Many features but most are illusory: BPM abslolument unreliable at best average effects for some and difficult to use because you have to counter the rise in volume due to the activation effects.
Otherwise the quality of the equalizer is correct and still no malfunctions to report
Briefly for those who do not really need 4-way, I recommend the Numark dxm06 in the same price range but with very usable effects.

I do not have that choice would do

Non-rackmount console.
Doom RCA (gold plated even qd)
Effects just sucks But it has all the characteristics of a large table.

UTILIZATION

Config copied from Pioneer, very effective and simple. Even intuitive. The functions are easily accessible and I have not even opened the manual

SOUNDS

Y clearly qd breath you climb the master above 7-8 10. But we can certainly stay below and the sound becomes quite drinkable, even good if the downstream system is quality.
The effects are just to forget!

Slight problem: On my last evening (yesterday), the first use of the machine recently purchased ... The sound was good until late in the evening (+ /-3 am), where high and low volume started to appear ... I have not found an acceptable explanation for this, but by connecting the PC from which came the music on a Mackie next, turning the music perfectly. The problem is the table. I therefore put him 7.

A small edit a few months: The sounds are pretty bad ... The EQ is very far from being linear (that's normal), but not log either ... The cuts are too sharp a point in time. I maintain that the breath does not exist if it agrees to keep the master up to 8. Against by the sound that comes out of this besiole does not suit me ... Problem with RCA, or the internal architecture of the table, I do not know. One thing is certain, not possible to do professional work in these conditions -> I sold it!
But I think for beginners, it can be of great service (especially the price), so that they learn on a table that has the air of a large (just look eh: D)

OVERALL OPINION

It's a Behringer, certainly, but definitely worth its price, and even more!
The price / quality ratio is unbeatable. I used all kinds of tables (Mackie, Behringer, Yamaha, Pioneer, etc.). And it is worth surment not one of those brands (but why not put XLR?), But it honorably defended much better! I highly recommend it!

Edit: this is now about 3 months I use it and it is the victim of a false contact. The power supply is cut for a few seconds sometimes qd of 1cm on the move ... I do not spit on Behringer provided. At that price, they are tacitly accepting that risk to take! Too bad all the same, I liked him but I will have to replace it with another, more reliable. Fortunately, it happened one day when I was having fun with me, but I can not risk that happening right in the event ... I go down but its overall score of 8 to 6.

Hmm, it is on these points that attracted me to the matron, trs attractive on paper but the debutanisme EST ......

UTILIZATION

L is also sduisant, "she pte this table for its price, it's crazy, it's not possible," h yeah it's not possible !..... cest ca the desilusionisme

SOUNDS

It's ugly, it blows serious, but the qual and kills it going not too bad.

OVERALL OPINION

My first (only) table, for 2 years my alie, I was quickly disappointed, shortly before its 1 year, phono amps slammed, the faders have begun to crack and messing end of the race .. .. it's ugly.
With the experience I have absolutely no choice referrer, you who read, think twice, it is better to be patient before, that of being obliged APRS (buy a new table !!!!) .............. ca cest the decutentisme. Amitis

No rack
the effects are very poor if not fun to begin djing

4 channels + 1 micro

Only RCA and XLR for mic

Eq is not parametric

UTILIZATION

Operation is very simple and the buttons are well placed I think

I covered only the last page of the manual (page white loll)

SOUNDS

It is almost transparent (almost: for the breath after wear)

Yes there is breath in the sound levels but only after wear potentiometer.

The EQ is effective up to a certain limit (limit I would say)

OVERALL OPINION

8 months (daily use x number of hours ((no stop)))

I like this track very practical, the button layout, price, durability

I do not like the sound of wind that appeared after a few months is the worst default this table should be said but I think it has to turn 8 months and everything is intact and focntionnel 100%. The only thing it does time to time you saw the c Metter bpm counter and displaying a really c but oddly OCASI is disconnected the current 3 sec it reconnects it starts and start fresh

The price is excellent I would say for what she has as she

so a realistic ssm-2200 bronze-colored

I do not refer this choice for the simple reason that I want to mix in the box and it does not effect my x-table should be changed (Especially for the breath) I then folds into the denon

Non Rack Console
Dpart effects & Returns
RCA Connectors XLR + jack & microphone
3-band EQ
Effects? If but ... 2% are usable!

UTILIZATION

Simple configuration
Manuel clear, but worth the read, the table is simple enough that

SOUNDS

Console not necessarily transparent, it introduces a lot of breath when used on large systems or default of a table are easily detectable.
Equalizer effective, but not badly configured linear

OVERALL OPINION

I used it for 2 years, mixes personal with me.
Outlawed for large accessories
I have tried many models before buying, more or less good: behringer vmx 300, pioneer djm 500 & 600, Ecler Smac & nuo, allen & heat, Oshino, Rodec ...
Report qualitprix interesting because low prices trs!
I would do this choice, I knew perfectly well what to expect by purchasing this table, it is suitable for use in non-intensive, home, or to learn about the world of mix without breaking the wallet ...

Table not rack ...

UTILIZATION

- The general configuration is it simple?
---> A table is very easy to take control
- The manual is clear and sufficient? ...
---> Yes it is very complete

SOUNDS

Nothing was said about the equalizer is quite corect!

OVERALL OPINION

- How long have you use it?
---> A year and a half
- What is so special that you like most and least?
---> Most-> look PIONEER DJM 600 for three times less
the least-> pourave effect but two (40 and echo flanger 39)
heated at the table after an hour of intensive mix
the sound is OK but not great ...
quality faders and buttons is completely sucks
- Have you tried many other models before buying it?
---> So the range pioneer (djm 400.600 and 800) and a home GEMINI PMX 500
- How would you rate the quality / price?
---> It is good, however, less than 300 euros lice do not expect to be seated the same quality that a Pioneer DJM 600
- With experience, you do again this choice? ...
---> Oula it was not a big ereur on my part to buy this m *** e. .. I save a pe of more and acquire directly from a djm 600 OCCAZ!

No rack, it enoooormeeeeee wide, takes up too much space

cf manufacturer

- What is the type of connectors (RCA, Jack, XLR ...)?

RCA phono line cd ...
micro
- The qualiseur ..
I think it's fairly limited
an effect section, any one, and unitilisable, the effect and rotten very quickly forget the

bpm counter jumps at times, has remained a powerful indicator but not trs

UTILIZATION

Trs remains easy to use,
for beginners it is nickel
not need to simply open the manual zoeil: D

SOUNDS

He got a big breath, but the sound is correct, so I poussse by external amps and qualizeur: D
I regret the lack of pramplis for turntables (there can be as one but I do not feel)
it heats too quickly, and the buttons is the can (they'll often remain in the hands)
it still remains slight, I like a lot of pr-listening,

OVERALL OPINION

In recent months
in all I find trs decent for the price, I have had of another mixer,
I pay 180 euros, I think it's honest,
but choose, I would invest the 200 euros more,
reselling used, it can reach 80 to 50 euros, that does mean is a mean

I would do is not choice, as deus behringer products ... is the 3rd purchase this brand, and the 3rd time I sold it as fast

- Is the rack? Not
- How many lanes, bus attendant, of dparts, returns ...)? 4 + 1 master tracks and a microphone jack
- What is the type of connectors (RCA, Jack, XLR ...)? RCA Jack
- The qualiseur paramtrique is it?
- The effects section is it intgre? ... Yes, well if you can call a effects, has labeled 75 but effects such as: 20 to 10 from 11 / 12 / 13 and suddenly it goes up to 75 20 and this

UTILIZATION

- The configuration gnrale Is it easy? Trs simple
- The usual functions are they easily accessible? Yes easily
- The manual is clear and sufficient? but it is clear there is no point because the table is very easy to take control

SOUNDS

- The console is transparent?
- Introduced she breath? Yes, it produces a blast when you push the master from 7
- The qualiseur is it effective?

OVERALL OPINION

- How long have you use it? Ending for 2 years
- What is the particular feature you like best and least?
Most:
Its price
Easy to use
It allows Despite a good approach to the world of deejaying
Design: copy of a djm 600 but it is nice to see even when
The -:
Quality of the table gnral
Trs faders not strong (they are my dj remains in the hands quite a few times but I'm not nag)
The quality of sound that is pretty average
The BPM counter prcis not at all (but at least can not catch a thing to rely on a counter for my cd decks do not have meters)
The potentiomtres not prcis (must be down to bottom or bottom to hear that cuts the bass or add it in)
XPQ Soround mode that is not used much and when the sound becomes loud active
The really bad effect bote
- Have you tried many other models?
DJM 600 / DJM 800 / Synq SMX-2 / Reloop RMX 40 / DJM 400

- How do you report qualitprix?
For someone who just want to mix fun with him, and without making any accessories it's all good because it is not coteuse but for someone who really make it the DSIR I advise you to wait for more money to beginners because you will find it well but after a month you'll quickly see that this is not a trs good food, but good c ' is my first mix and I am glad I t and this changes to an Allen & Heat Xone 22

- With the exprience, you do again this choice? ...

Not because I wait to have more money to buy a better quality table

Non Rack
RCA connectors
8 inputs 4 channels. 2 inputs / outputs for effects and 3 independent outputs;
integrated effects section.

UTILIZATION

easy to use manual configuration very clear and simple.

SOUNDS

breath = not for me, but I heard it on forums ended up having the breath.
equalizer = sufficient, but I do not use it in a very sharp either.
Console transparent = yes

OVERALL OPINION

I use it occasionally so she is in good condition.
I heard that intensive use, problems could appear.
No I have not tried many models it was appropriate for the use I intended to do. (Studio use to link my machines, and occasionally for private parties.)
no particular favorite or least liked.
value price.
I would do with this choice probably saw the experience as mine is flawless.

I'm sharing my experience in this low end table!

Already, after 1 year and 3 months, she started to induce a breath in the master, then one lane of the headphone (left in this case) has released basically I am forced to put my headphone upside down (just ca no headset that works on my pc). And now I have my VU meter which are all extinct!

Otherwise I would say about the quality (from what I have left functional on the table), the knobs are limits unnecessary, since we do not feel the change on the EQ (except when you put a 0) .

Wholesale Behringher copy the design pioneer, but it will only copy the design!

So I do not do it again this election! and I look forward to my DJM 700 which should arrive soon.

UTILIZATION

yes it is very simple

SOUNDS

EQ is useless and it introduces the breath in the master!

The BPM counter is useless (well any good DJ does not need the BPM counter) and the sound effects sacked over qqchose they afford!

OVERALL OPINION

1 year and 3 months, so I mixed on a DJM 800 in club!

I would not call ratio Q / P, but a price as low as the quality

And no I will never recover from behringher!

See specifications table

UTILIZATION

It is very easy to use, nothing to say about it

SOUNDS

By upgrading its quality is not against the appointment, when mounting the master means a breath when pushed to 7 / 8, after there is a mode that call'd XPQ sorround that is useless I find it gives more sound, but it gets loud and you lose even more quality

OVERALL OPINION

◦ For how long have you been using it?
Since September 2008

◦ Did you try many other models before getting this one?
DJM 600, DJM 800, DJM 400, Synq I remember the name

◦ What thing do you like most/least about it?
The +: easy to use, the design (it's still a good copy of the DJM 600 but it's still fun to watch), the ergonomics of the table
The -: there is much to say unfortunately, is what I do not like about this table, a BPM counter inaccurate at best (at times it tells me that I knew 75 BPM Jumpstyle mix which is around 150 BPM but heuresment good that I did not need a meter to calibrate my tracks), the meters, which is mostly set aside when the tempo is slow, if not always fix a disastrous effect box, the table is light nothing that the bear is seen that the quality is not top, the fader that I remained in the hands of 2 / 3 times yet I'm careful, sound quality, especially when you put the master at about 8 means a huge blast but when there is music it is camouflaged Luckily, then, so there is really the most boring styles that I saw the mix (Jumpstyle, House / Electro) have the potientiomètres really sketchy when I fall but treble up on certain songs I can still hear my bass, so the sudden you'd hear a difference but not so he must go down as the other potientiomètre to hear a little less bass (and sometimes they are still audible!) and also when is lowered to a quarter of the bass: no change means it always stays the same as many bass

◦ What is your opinion about the value for the price?
New for 169 € it's not stolen, so for the price it will

◦ Knowing what you know now, would you make the same choice? ...
No more I turned to a Rodec, Pioneer, Denon, Aleen & Heath, Rane