All user reviews for the Pioneer DJM-800

Good mixer really solid, we feel that the quality is there! I had a jcb nos before 2010, so nothing to do .. this is the first time I buy a Pioneer mixer and high-end new! Its really pleased to have material like that in the hands .. it becomes a real pleasure to mix by spending hours of time without realizing it ..! I like the power output, we see that there are many performance effects are also very good and powerful I think (the flanger, phaser very simpa) effects on the microphone are also really great, once the table in hand, you can really do anything .. combination of effects etc! You just have good quality speakers behind with possibly asser powerful subwoofer .. and, it explodes! I used both for parties of 300 people or a quiet evening with pals 10. The price of course is still very expensive for a mixer 1500euros .. it is on, once it has been good, but to buy it must still have the means .. Here, I am completely satisfied with this mixer, even if I not use any effects ...

UTILIZATION

well.

SOUNDS

very good, not breathing

OVERALL OPINION

8 months

Beat Effects Delay, Echo, Reverse Delay, Pan, Trnace, Filter, Flanger, Phaser, Reverb, Robot, Chorus, Roll, Reverse Roll

Harmonic effects, Sweep, Crush, Filter

Control MIDI / MIDI HID Controls (61 fully assignable)

Number of Channels 4

Frequency / sampling depth 96 kHz / 24-bit digital mixer
* 3-band Equalizer by ~ 6 -26
* Rotary Faders Optional
* Level Meter Individual segments 15

* CD / LINE Input (RCA) 5
* Enter PHONO (RCA) 3
* S / PDIF Digital Input (RCA) 4
* MIC Input (XLR) 1
* MIC Input (6.35) a
* RETURN (6.35) a

* Master Output (XLR) 1
* Master Output (RCA) 1
* Output (Jack 6.35) 1 (TRS)
* Rec Out (RCA) 1
* Digital output (coaxial) 1 (48 kHz or 96 kHz)
* Digital Output (RCA) 1 x (SP / DIF) (48kHz or 96kHz)
* Send (Jack 6.35) a
* Booth Monitor Yes

Mic Connection Neutrik Combo # (x 2), Phone (x1)
# 2 band Mic EQ
# Band Mic EQ -6 to +6 dB
Talkover Switch # 3 positions
# Auto Talkover

* Dimensions (L x W x D) 320 x 108 x 381 mm
Weight 8 kg
* Power consumption 30 Watt
* SN Ratio: Line 105 dB
* SN Ratio: Phono 88 dB
* SN Ratio: Mic 84 dB
* Harmonic Distortion 0.005%
* Crosstalk: Line 82 dB dB

UTILIZATION

Basic table very easy to use. the manual is clear all the functions are easily accessible once identified and managed

SOUNDS

The lack of "punch" compared to a Rodec Xone92 or A & H.

No blows on the master, light on the return (booth)
3 bands equalizer cut very low.

OVERALL OPINION

* How long have you use it? + - 3 years
* What is so special that you love the most, the easier everyone found there, although the effects complete and accurate,

less? Headphone replaced 2 times already and seen the interior quality is really poor (headphones), I'm not the only one to use (rental) I'm not always there to check the delicacy of the DJs, but this type of product especially for the price I expected better.

* Have you tried many other models before buying it?
not before but compared with Rodec - more punch, its much more beautiful, clean, round without additional EQ.
A & H Xone 3D/92, melted much cleaner,

* How would you rate the quality / price? "I say, money, too expensive,
too Life is priceless " but Pioneer still had abused the other shot is aligned such models 4 tracks

* With experience, you do again this choice? ...

Mixed feelings

see on any site to the characteristics

UTILIZATION

Use simple, it must be or must be missing may be the "kill", but the knob down very low.

SOUNDS

Rca plugged into the sound is OK, a little breath on the back, but the return is not for the public ...

OVERALL OPINION

I have 2 years, do not worry until ^ present, I like the double-effect box, efficient syur techno, jump, trance or the like.


Pioneer will always be expensive ...
I tested numark (High Quality) and I had the pleasure of testing a xone92 and it's true that this noise n'zest not the same thing .... to see next to each portfolio and its use

For all that, I bring you the manual. Otherwise, the connectors: RCA for line / phono inputs / digital
XLR and RCA outputs for Master Jack, and finally to return and the departure / return external effect.
Micro Combo Jack / XLR

UTILIZATION

The config is very simple as long as one knows a little usability Pioneer at the outcome level.
The rest is a classic table rather well thought everything falls quickly at hand.

The manual is sufficiently clear and complete.

The usual function are all instantly accessible.

SOUNDS

The sound is OK, although I think it lacks a bit of potato. Depending on the use that may interfere (this is why I sold). It is much better than the DJM600, for cons I think the DJM700 is inflated low.
There is no breath, she does not saturate even if it's never good to push a bottom.
The does not fully equalize the frequencies ... So after all depends on what one seeks.
The effects are good quality, most effective and quick to use.

OVERALL OPINION

I had it for 3 years but I still use it very often in clubs.
I tried a lot of other models: the low end when I started, and Denon DN-X1500, which is much like the 800 but I find less ergonomic.
I mixed most of the range of Pioneer (300,350,400,600,700,800) and the advantage is that people come here right away.
Ecler NUO5 (I did not like because I feel bad settings ahead of the table)
Now I have a Xone 42 because I love simple, sound great, beautiful filters and since I did not use too the effects of the Pioneer, I preferred a better sound and a potato.

What I like most: Ergonomics without a doubt, the quality, impact and connectivity, as well as the resistance of the faders is (to my taste) perfect (but the race is short)
What I like least: The lack of potatoes (it is obviously necessary to compare it with another ... if you do not realize it). Otherwise there is not much to throw on the table.

It is expensive ... For half the price it was a Xone 42, but with no effect filter sick. But well after the next "all-in-one" is also appreciable, and then it's still a high-end table.
With the experience of so many, I changed for my personal use but otherwise I'm very happy to find it in the club

see other opinions

UTILIZATION

very easy to use and clear the dial display is large enough and read distinctly informations.Le manual itself is boring and not a consular browse the tout.Il is large and does not hurt the eyes.

SOUNDS

I'm not super stall but I find the quality of the gear more than correct, the are is clean and clear I believe that what matters, but maybe the punch changes everything?? Indeed the equalizer does not cut the sound completely, which is commême damage, especially for serious cons For they have just the right resistance when turning the knob which is very pleasant when one quibble though and they respect the level of scale which allows you to enter a very subtle mix and mix the sons.On between sound more distinctly with such insipid. I 've no breath.

OVERALL OPINION

So I absolutely agree that the price is totally abused me, I have buy 1100 euro (introductory offer but I 'did not know). I do not think I would have been able to give 1500.Le problem C is that this product works very well, so why lower the price? On the other hand Pioneer is a safe bet, I 'want to prove that I have purchased almost 3 years ago and I use it every day casi almost despite the dust it does not move the faders are always retained a bit even though I am careful not to hit too dedans.Dommage to have put the coming of the headphone above his ruin me every time my cable more often I bump by turning the headset volume is Just to be rated.
In conclusion, given the time that I have already run over and the real pleasure that I 'did I really regret it, but really the price ????, guys I like very much all small indicator light that flashes, the canon in the dark.

I use a DJM 800 for 1 year and before it was mounted before the boards of Deauville, she turned at least 3 years continuously in the box, result:
change all the pots without exception! (These are traditional pots ALPS)
After Service is mad she left like new!
This table is certainly great, terrible effects, a reliability (even champagne!), A clean output, the reference is serious!
BUT it is shameful to DJM 800 if paid a dear! if it is to have pots of RS in a 2 euro was inside the pots!
He could still make an effort!
Anyway I can assure you it's the same with denon!
Yes I would do if he is choosing to put the pots stronger (type Penny & Gilles)
I keep the same speech to the 500 and 600!
But that's how good and that's it !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

simplisime

OVERALL OPINION

◦ For how long have you been using it?
my godfather was so, as we often mix together it has been about 10 months (before he had the 600)

◦ Did you try many other models before getting this one?
djm 600, djm 400, Behringer DJX 700, x-trem 1 SYNQ

◦ What thing do you like most/least about it?
The +: box impeccable effect, a second box under the effect pototiomètres which is also great to share an effect so I can not remember the name (I think harmonic), the faders solid and enjoyable to use, the screen bpm counter and choice of effect (there are 4 types by purpose), accurate bpm counter, rubber knobs (but good to see if they would evont not degrade over time), when precise faders down the bass is heard (quite different than my DJX 700!, design, precise VU meter (it also changes my DJX!), sound quality very good quality, ease of use
The -: bpm counter a bit long at times (but it is very accurate but good ear is the best way), the price per cons I think it's very over-estimated it is certainly a excellent table but for what it is € 1500 is expensive, pay twice the djm 600 is too exaggerated, so it is not much better than the 600 it is better of course, but that it is 2x more expensive no I do not agree

◦ What is your opinion about the value for the price?
A new € 900/1000 it would have been more suitable

◦ Knowing what you know now, would you make the same choice? ...
I would wait it down at least 500 € for € 1500 it is expensive anyway, for 750 € less I would rather buy a 600 anyway for 850 € or less the Denon DNX-1500

See previous review

Rather complete damage that it disappoints as usual solidity level.
Pioneer has yet laid a beautiful table keke as they know them so well does not forget the super long and painful Service and the exorbitant price of the rooms as usual.


UTILIZATION

Obviously s is the pioneer of ergonomics and appointment.
S 'is in fact the best thing that they do well in their trash ergonomics.
Would that we think of quality of materials, provided their table because its not fly high.
I 'm Knob explains the gain of the game have made her afraid by the way, and fader are of dubious quality.

SOUNDS

the equalizer - yes they do it effectively removes nevertheless not totally unlike my frequency NUO5

For the rest see the previous review


OVERALL OPINION

I use it for a very few tps I buy second hand.

I have a pioneer and frankly ecler NUO5 s' is always the same.
Qualiter below the other and you pay the triple of a good table.
Okay it is digital the sound is correct for once it was finally gst
The faders are not worth my NUO5.
Its still a table with Mickey more light level meter that a trail of atterisage.
Nevertheless s' is a reference fortunately the digital outputs and the quality of sound + the two boxes are indeed was the justification for such a price if I will have to buy. I have already had the pioneer djm djm 500 and 707 which was the most correct of any I find without being extraordinary except for the crossfader djm 800 and this displeases me most in terms of value for money I totally abusing everyone who complains bought it new.

Frankly the only interest to possess it 's is to have the same stuff that if canned
ECLEER and Allen & Heath or rodec or a rane empath s' is something else carrement level of solidity and quality component.
Fortunately I just succeed THE EXCHANGE cons rodec a 180 MK3 and the sound s is something that a digital pio. go see my opinion on this wonder for those who do not know the beast.

https://fr.audiofanzine.com/console-dj/rodec/MX180MK3/avis/

for characteristics to reach the site of pioneer

UTILIZATION

yes hyper simple manual I did not read and functions are very well thought

SOUNDS

yes quite equalizer is correct for breath all depends on the cables that are used I read some reviews and I think they are a little hard everyone say it lacks bass this is especially true if one branch Digital turntables cd but if you branch with RCA cables (not digital) Brand monster I can tell you that it has nothing to do and this is true for all other branches (amplifiers, speakers, boxes of effects ...) Monster cables offer an incomparable sound and they are reinforced and very good insulation professionals Elsewhere scene uses this brand and I personally have no breath though for some there is see the connections that are often bad bill I had cable brand and I can breath.

OVERALL OPINION

3 years yes (djm 600, gemini, ecler ...) as the dual effects box and the sound was improved relative to the DJM600, the less fragile potentiometers. For the price it is expensive especially as there are tables of different brands that have better sound and at a lower cost. But I do it again this choice with your eyes closed.

For specs - site

UTILIZATION

Purchased Pioneer "emergency" for several evenings after my Xone-92 Rotary me left on the floor!
Rather hesitant to shop in response to criticism Read on sound quality, but not for Xone So I fell back on the only available model pro.
Getting started very fast, faster than bcp Xone, appreciated!

SOUNDS

Initially very suspicious - mixing preferably vinyl, I do not think that digital can "pull" the sound of both fields!
After a first listen, the bass is a bit missing but after several tests, I found that the table was finally balanced and sound very clear, perhaps less "flattering" that my Xone but very correct.
Have particularly appreciated the harmonic filter is ideal for maintaining a good tone of voice pieces a little too fast or slow (kind beyond 3-4%), really nice. Other filters are funny but not worth the filters Heath Allen, except that allowed Roll amazing stuff in the mix. But we get tired quickly.
Question breath is better than the Xone - nothing! Good balance

OVERALL OPINION

so. I mix for 3 weeks on and I'm not disappointed at all. It is a very good restaurant in which I will add the option rotary (which I miss most). I thought to take it and sell my Xone repaired soon but I did not so sure. I'll use a little forward because it is better than the criticism it suffered probably its price (admittedly exaggerated) is there for something!