Log in
Log in

or
Create an account

or
< All M-Audio Oxygen 49 (Blue) reviews
Add this product to
  • My former gear
  • My current gear
  • My wishlist
M-Audio Oxygen 49 (Blue)
Images
1/226
M-Audio Oxygen 49 (Blue)
Price engine
Classified Ads
Forums
V4r!@x V4r!@x
Published on 01/15/10 at 00:50
What characteristics have motivated your choice?

The presence of assignable knobs and faders.
I am not a pianist or keyboard player and I needed a simple keyboard to make small nap, drum loops ...

What connector (MIDI pedals ...)?
Connectivity is simple enough: USB for the transfer, an on / off button, an input jack for a sustain pedal

UTILIZATION

<ul class="ul">

The touch keyboard is it nice? Should your use?

</ul>

Touch keyboard (plastic) enough for me.

<ul class="ul">

The general configuration is simple?

</ul>

Yes, Plug & Play for basic functions ie noon. Tested only on Mac
For integration into your favorite DAW is the site of M-Audio as it happens. Several drivers are available.
I currently only tested the driver logic and garage band.
Some assignments do not work in garage band "out of the box"
<ul class="ul">

The selection of MIDI channels, patches is easy?

</ul>

Yes

<ul class="ul">

The manual is clear and sufficient? ...

</ul>

NO, ridicule.La paper manual pdf provided in the cd driver is suffisante.Le cd only contains drivers for protools for MacOSX and WindowsAucune software offering.

OVERALL OPINION

<ul class="ul">

For how long have you been using it?

</ul>

1 day, the first review out of the box. I nuance later

<ul class="ul">

What thing do you like most/least about it?

</ul>

Most buttons, faders and assignable transport function in this price range

<ul class="ul">

Did you try many other models before getting this one?

</ul>

No, the first keyboard to commencer.Je does not become a keyboardist so ...
<ul class="ul">

What is your opinion about the value for the price?

</ul>

Very satisfactory 100-120 €
<ul class="ul">

Knowing what you know now, would you make the same choice?

</ul>

We'll see