All user reviews of 4/5 for the Yamaha MSP5

I needed something better than my hi-fi system to make electronic music with my PC! I was looking at classified ads but a musician friend of mine recommended me the MSP5, which were on sale. An important point for me back then, and still today, is that the vents are on the front, because I can place them close to a wall (I don't have another choice!).

Use: Home studio, after more than 10 years, they still work perfectly

No amp because they are bi(amplified), my setup consists only of two MSP5s connected to the outputs of an analog mixer.

SOUND

I have not many points of comparison.

Frequency response curve: They lack deep lows (which is normal given the size of the speakers) and they have some sort of dip and a boost in the mids, which makes the overall sound more aggressive than with other speakers. I am so used to them that I have a hard time assessing sounds!
In any case, they have a very good dynamic response and at loud volumes the vents blow so much air with the kicks that you can use them as hair dryers! Beyond a certain volume you can hear air-swishing sounds from the vents, which is annoying (but only at very loud volumes, to rehearse with your deaf buddies, not a level you'd use for mixing).

I think they are best for rock, pop and similar, rather than electronic music or techno (especially due to the lack of deep lows).

OVERALL OPINION

After more than 12 years of use I still can't part with them (even if I bought some Genelecs, I'd still find a use for the MSP5s). I haven't tested any other models at my place but I have been able to use other ones in other home-studios: The big Yamaha 80W with subwoofer wouldn't suit me because the vents are on the rear and the difficulty to find the right place for the subwoofer. However, it's true that the lows go much deeper which makes it more comfortable to mix electronic music.

I have also used some Genelecs, which are certainly better... but the price is not the same!

I'm happy with my MSP5, which I know very well now. I also work with (good) cans since the kids' rooms are close to the studio. When a mix sounds fine both with my cans and the MSP5s then I can say it's okay.

They are solid, reliable, dynamic and a bit aggressive, you need to tame them (like all monitors), but once you do, it's a real treat to use them.

The MSP5 were my first monitor speakers. They are an excellent quality / price ratio, at least they were at the time.

SOUNDS

They are powerful, relatively neutral although a bit bright, they can be a bit tiring on the length but allow very good mix once you start to know them well (which is the case for all monitor speakers).
The sound is quite clear and precise and very good stereo image.

OVERALL OPINION

I use them for years. I replaced by Focal as main speakers stereo, and I spent a very decent 5.1 setup cost.

Moreover, they are very robust and I never experienced any problems with.

The choice of speaker monitoring is very subjective, it is difficult for me to do a review. I do not regret having bought.

I've bought used for their prices, their robustness and acceptable to mix sound.

SOUNDS

It lacks a lot of bass, it is ok but small even compared to other speakers of the same size they are less good at the bottom.
I find the overall effect quite aggressive, useful for mixing but tiring.
The lower medium is little precise.

OVERALL OPINION

A strong point is the sturdiness, I'm not afraid to move, no need to mettres in a cardboard box, bubble wrap, foam and all the stuff to carry.

At bargain price, this is a very good value for money. By against nine I think there is more in the same category.

I use these speakers for a series of TV mixing ... The client had had the usual mounting Documentaries hear her over, so we had to add them to the main system.
60w they announce, but I find them fairly powerful compared to 8020 or genelec my celestion ditton 33 ...

SOUNDS

They are quite tiring when you have over intense days.
Unpleasant to write, because analytical, they are there to show defects by to please us ...

The mid / high-mids are very gross ... we do hear the voice of defects, com and singing. But suddenly they are a bit aggressive.

OVERALL OPINION

I use them for 3 years, especially in the second listening, because I find tiring and unpleasant enough to compose long.
But I always audited smixs above, and the voice over work.
After to the home studio that will have the budget for one pair, which will mainly music and premix, I suggest instead of fostex pm1 to have a little bass.
For use stereo, go your way, for sound editing and mixing, once again, why not listen to the second, but in principal, the focal CMS40, Althoughthe a little more expensive, should be less tiring and more balanced.

Good speakers, but rather targeted.

Listening to store motivated my choice impression of "sound projection" has the same low volume on these speakers is significant.
Amateur home studio use, small room (13m2), I was afraid of running out of power, I realize that the power is more than sufficient.

You do not hear too much about this model in the shop providing fans like me in the beginning of monitoring speakers range but listening really speaks for itself, not the AC jumps to the eyes but ears!

SOUNDS

In addition to the dynamic sound very good, I found all the frequencies I'm looking for easy listening, the bass are not present but too well I feel that without this "lack" important thing is not the 8 inches of course but the bass is.
I have not touched the rear switch that allows to modify the response to the bass or treble.
The stereo is good, at least to my perception.

OVERALL OPINION

I use them for a month, I found the latest model at the right price (beware there recent models (after consolidation by Yamaha) and other older who can date, the news front side edges rounded and not square like the old. wary of sellers who do not take into account the age of the speakers in their price in time!)

J was able to compare with the HS 50 HS 80 Mackie MR5 KRK Rookit, various prodipes, the choice of these speakers just seemed obvious, you will be able to discuss the fact that I have not experienced a sound engineer and I selected these speakers so subjectively, I simply printing to hear my mix properly on these speakers, without either flattering or too tiring.
I have found this particular dynamic in any of the other speakers mentioned above.

These speakers are heavy for their size, it is reassuring, the value for money looks good to me.
I would do without hesitation that choice

Monitoring speakers fairly compact, beefy (cast aluminum) so stable.
Jack and XLR connectors and markers of response curve at the rear gear.
Brief very serious hardware for its price and even more than some competing models ... (See below).

SOUNDS

The sound is very clear (Yamaha would have it), neutral or even a little clinic in the medium; bass and clear treble and detail can work properly equalizations really discerning sources.
No crash dynamics, natural reproduction.
For those seeking a sound flattering, caressing the mixer in the direction of the hair, buy a music system

OVERALL OPINION

I use them since their purchase in 2004, and I do not use them because they are enough for me and that I have my bearings.
I could, when buying them, compare them with Tannoy Reveal (a bit aggressive for my taste and color mediums) and Alesis M1 MKII (too flattering to be honest), sold in the same price at the time .
The Yamaha, among the three, are those which seem the most return the CD I had on me: no staining, no excessive bass boost, treble definition of good without becoming aggressive.
Obviously this is only my opinion (the goal) and I advise everyone to test several models at the same time: there really is a matter of taste in the choice of monitoring speakers.
For my part, I would do this choice without hesitation.

Very good bass response.
Auxiliary input mix to combine two (or two readers) ... Or like me a CD for "play along" and the mixer general.

SOUNDS

I have not compared with other models in situ (in my home studio).
In addition, jee through a 31 band EQ to attenuate the resonances of the room, so ...

on the other hand, accuracy is excellent. Same too! Attention to the full mix of low frequencies that drowned when listening on a hi-fi ...

OVERALL OPINION

I use it for about 8 years. But I take care of (especially with an ignition delay compared to the lighting instruments and the table).

I tried the MSP 3 in stores but the difference in bass made me plunge.

I repeat without hesitation.

Active monitoring speakers of robust construction.
Very reliable over time.

In 2004, there was not any choice that you can find today.
Personal use for mixing and mastering.

SOUNDS

The frequency curve is relatively neutral.
Good momentum.

I noticed that they tended to quickly tire the ear at high volume.
Good stereo image when the speakers are placed correctly.
Lack some bass, over time when you know you get her pregnant to compensate.

OVERALL OPINION

It is now 8 years that I use.
I had tried, in stores, quite a few other models but difficult to get a real idea in this environment. Especially as the sound changes depending on the room where they are located. (Walls, reflections etc. ...)

Very good price / quality ratio.
I have never regretted my purchase.
Today, I'd perhaps for other forums but the choice is now wider.

active monitoring bi amplified with a flatter response and wider than the NS10 ( passive front volume.
computer music for everyday use, composition, recording and mix.
No amp so because already bi amplified 2x70w at all and that's enough for a piece of 20m2.Utilisées homestudio in a configuration of an output analog sound card xlr own.

SOUNDS

the frequency curve is super neutral and broad enough to cover most musical styles. after all depends on the acoustic of the room and speaker placement (see instructions very clear on the subject + offset low or high as possible on the back). dynamic really impressive for this price.
the stereo mix provides a precise nearfield.
the sound is clear and precise, sometimes too low in the spectrum, in fact, these are studio monitors, as a result the low frequencies are much cleaner than a hi-fi system or another (a differential after listening mix is ​​better anyway) ... mediums can work without fatiguing the ear surgery and acute are without pity = if dirty or whistling, is final.

OVERALL OPINION

11 years already. I listen to before buying another monitor and since I walked around in a lot of studio and home studio = I remain very happy with my choice for the price and use that I have. I like the width of the spectrum and it's neutrality and the virtual absence of ear fatigue generated.
Excellent quality / prix.avec the same budget I would do the same choice at 80%.