View other reviews for this product:
Published on 02/20/05 at 01:25
I pass over the dtails techniques. Mine had the card "60's 70's." The possibilities are standards but it is a gas plant that thing. The connection is complte trs. No breath, multiple outputs, trs pro.
UTILIZATION
So I just do srieusement the lower the note. I find that using this machine is complicated trs! It's filled with endless sub-menus. The edition of the sounds is long and tedious. The manual is cryptic at times ... Abscon in clear enough.
I prcise I am not a "blair" in Contents of Computer noon and keyboards, but for the dclencher a leslie, have done better math sup.
I remember that for all rglages bte rgler as a split point has took me one hour with the manual (in English) on the knees.
SOUNDS
I think the sounds are turned trs "film music" with tablecloths and beautiful kit from hell, but for acoustic I stayed on my hunger, at least with the sounds of bases. The piano sounds are unusable carrment and more like the rhodes got my DX7. It manages some 60's with the card, especially for some organs and keyboards, but nothing to any of the same.
OVERALL OPINION
I toured with for several years and I sold. I wanted to give my opinion possibly deter a musician in my case (that is - who wants to say something simple and effective for the scne) to buy this machine ... at least not without having at least to try before. The critics are so on logieuses AF mfie we do too much.
The card's 60 is very well, but I think this is bcanne directs "studio / film music." For a musician looking for beautiful sounds effective I think there better today.
I prcise the same era when I bought a m'tais VK7, and I found that the sounds of hammond card "60's" taient better texture than my VK7. Even when it is a good machine. But that decision-head for the shipping ... But the panel is large (2U) so does not excuse a lack of ergonomics: there are plenty of buttons, which sometimes only serve nothing.
UTILIZATION
So I just do srieusement the lower the note. I find that using this machine is complicated trs! It's filled with endless sub-menus. The edition of the sounds is long and tedious. The manual is cryptic at times ... Abscon in clear enough.
I prcise I am not a "blair" in Contents of Computer noon and keyboards, but for the dclencher a leslie, have done better math sup.
I remember that for all rglages bte rgler as a split point has took me one hour with the manual (in English) on the knees.
SOUNDS
I think the sounds are turned trs "film music" with tablecloths and beautiful kit from hell, but for acoustic I stayed on my hunger, at least with the sounds of bases. The piano sounds are unusable carrment and more like the rhodes got my DX7. It manages some 60's with the card, especially for some organs and keyboards, but nothing to any of the same.
OVERALL OPINION
I toured with for several years and I sold. I wanted to give my opinion possibly deter a musician in my case (that is - who wants to say something simple and effective for the scne) to buy this machine ... at least not without having at least to try before. The critics are so on logieuses AF mfie we do too much.
The card's 60 is very well, but I think this is bcanne directs "studio / film music." For a musician looking for beautiful sounds effective I think there better today.
I prcise the same era when I bought a m'tais VK7, and I found that the sounds of hammond card "60's" taient better texture than my VK7. Even when it is a good machine. But that decision-head for the shipping ... But the panel is large (2U) so does not excuse a lack of ergonomics: there are plenty of buttons, which sometimes only serve nothing.