4.1/5(7 reviews)
57 %
14 %
14 %
14 %
Write a user review
Users reviews
DJBenoîtproblem with Powersoft Digam
Published on 02/25/13 at 15:11 (This content has been automatically translated from French)I used it for a few months after buying opportunity with another Digam a little less powerful.
I used previously amps Yamaha, Dynacord Crest and still functioning perfectly.
After a return to service of Powersoft for a layout problem and fast protection peak on my two amps, repair return showed their inability to deal with the problem! No improvement! who had the same problem and got away?
So, we drag our old amps still effective but heavy!
THANK YOU in advance for your answers!25
Victoria V.robust, reliable
Published on 08/23/12 at 14:46 (This content has been automatically translated from French)We have 2 DIGAM 7000 for almost 5 years, bought both used.
We also Crown: MA 1200, 2400, 5000, VZ, CHEVIN Q6, other Digam etc ...
We are happy vraiments of 7000, we have already run less than 2 ohm carefree.
We never had a technical problem with these amps.
What we like the most:
weight, strength, reliability, power / weight ratio, "fishing" sound, the ability to load the channels (less than 2 ohm), its resistance to heat.
Least: the sound can only be less "hot" than equivalent analog amplifier, and the length of the amp (not rackable in "standard" formats)
But I have very few negative points about these amps.
With the experience we'd definitely undoubtedly the same choice…Read moreWe have 2 DIGAM 7000 for almost 5 years, bought both used.
We also Crown: MA 1200, 2400, 5000, VZ, CHEVIN Q6, other Digam etc ...
We are happy vraiments of 7000, we have already run less than 2 ohm carefree.
We never had a technical problem with these amps.
What we like the most:
weight, strength, reliability, power / weight ratio, "fishing" sound, the ability to load the channels (less than 2 ohm), its resistance to heat.
Least: the sound can only be less "hot" than equivalent analog amplifier, and the length of the amp (not rackable in "standard" formats)
But I have very few negative points about these amps.
With the experience we'd definitely undoubtedly the same choice!See less40- macdriverzPublished on 03/08/06 at 05:42 (This content has been automatically translated from French)I did not use a long time because I did not like at all the sound coming out of a sub use.
The amp does not follow at all in complex loads, it must glean the equalo to have a little something and there, the huge excess of power becomes a little help.
A bit like using a 1 "compression to 200 Hz ..
is super light, that it must be acknowledged. It is close to 1.3 kilograms per kilowatt amp. It is the only huge interest in this amp. A if the current widespread use.
Against by using top, or broadband, which does not drop too much, it's all good.02 - KorrigansPublished on 02/01/07 at 06:07 (This content has been automatically translated from French)I use these amps for years! I'm very happy! it works as well in that sub Broadband! I use 2 boxes DIGAM 7000 to 16 cm in 38 pavilions and a toboggan DIGAM 7000 8 cases for 38 inch mid-bass! Very stable at 2 ohms, generally I use them in heavy use for 48 hours non-stop! Finally, I use 1 to 4 heads DIGAM d1502 nexo 1000 and if all works very hard! I would definitely advice, good luck!00
- alakPublished on 05/08/09 at 18:23 (This content has been automatically translated from French)- Bought used on ebay United States 2 years ago = Q / trs right price
- Big sound, power, reliability PERFECT
- In addition to the road, only 10 kg, light weight for such power!
- I tried quite a few other amp before, especially YAMAHA (indestructible)
but the D is a class act!
- I would do that choice without HSITER10 
dtdfedorasPublished on 12/28/09 at 05:03 (This content has been automatically translated from French)I use it for 3 years on NEXO PS 15 without any worries. On the heads is top on the sub is a little below an old analog, but it works very well anyway
1 rack 2 u = 2 amps! to buy without hesitation to those who have a bad back .....
amp super more reliable on a fleet of 15 we had very few breakdowns and not very expensive heavy use (4 times a week over 3 years)
it's a good amp to buy without hesitation many qualities to some defects10- goldhanson
problem DIGAM 7000
Published on 07/20/10 at 00:22 (This content has been automatically translated from French)Hello, I wonder if anyone has had the same problem that we are on DIGAM 7000. We use 2 on BM 3000 APG. Lately, when used in 3 / 4 of their power, once he gets into the red, and goes into protection. Then he gradually resumed sending us "the shit". Has anyone ever had this problem? We do not know if it comes from the amp or processor apg. someone has an idea? thank you in advance34