All user reviews for the Prodipe TT1 Lanen

A microphone singing and speaking, I have used it directly on the recording branch between a "KORG D12" and although it really bluff me I found him a great sound, recording .dropoff window
Unidirectional dynamic microphone excellent !!!
50/15000 hz Frquence
meaning: 49dB
Impedance: 600 ohms

NOTICE GLOBAL

I just try today.
A particular feature I like is the coating of the micro, it is incredibly soft and the switch. I recorded with the foam of a micro "BEHRINGER B2" on top to avoid the "pop"
and many really excellent (and I'm not pay to say)
What I like least, not for now, ah so! the microphone holder comes with the internal thread of plastic, adj foir but it's okay and for the price (free.
A report quality price extra 39 but I got it as a gift to purchase a sound card in "UNIVERSE SON." thank you !!!!! and even small candies offered.
Comes with a nice shiny fabric cover.
In short, if you are not active rich, I advice you this is a very good mic.

What type of microphone? (Voice, sound, mixed ..)

It is a vocal microphone
What technology? (Electret, condenser ...)
See more below ples

NOTICE GLOBAL

How long have you use it?
10 months
What is the particular feature you like best and least?
Solid with good grip and ... SOUND

Have you tried many other models before acqurir?
Yes, I use all kinds of microphones on stage and in the studio for 18 years.
This mic is more directive than a Shure SM58 and less like the voice.
He may be accused of being a little plussensible the plosives, but he plays in the same court as the Shure.
Having Adi Sm and beta, I use it in complment for the singers on stage with unMC1 Prodipe for leads.
For connoisseurs, the difference between the tt1 and mc1 is the same between one sm and beta.

How do you report qualitprix?
It is stunning I have 35 pay destocking online.
Some retailers on Ebay offer lots tt1 prixcasss, may be good for groups.

With experience, you do again this choice? ...dropoff Window

Without hesitation, unless the MC-1 passes also 39! lol

Microphone singing

NOTICE GLOBAL

Hi!
I used this microphone for singing (pop / rock, as almost everyone!) For 6 months.
In the room, we had old sm 57 and 48, having already made several wars!
So I wanted my microphone to me, and when you start, the price is a main argument.

At first glance, that happiness!
The TT1 a potato hell, much more than those mentioned above, rendering hot and manly.

After some time, I realized that the feedback was difficult to manage (though some say!), And it is sensitive to plosives. In other words, if you yell a "Pooh", it makes a "plop" quite difficult to master.

Finally, my bass player lent me his beta 58 (yes ... 4X more expensive ... unless occase!), And there you can clearly hear a clearer sound, but also richer in all frequencies, much less sensitive to Plops (or insensitive), and easier to manage level feedback.

So it is a shure beta that I use now, but so far, I still keep my TT1 "just in case", and I know that this too shall pass ... by being thinner!

In summary:
+++ Barrel price, huge fishing, the switch (not so gadget that!), Excellent construction at this price, so the ratio Q / P unbeatable!

--- If you want finesse and respect grain of voice vote on something other than the big heavy, and do not frighten the needles on which PParoles PPètent ... be vigilant; ) !dropoff Window

Voice or singing karaoke.

OVERALL OPINION

I am not a specialist in micro, but I have another microphone which is twice trademark of tech that made me bought in a shop on Nancy touting the merits that this was the copy of SM58 and well TT1 Lanen is also good, more gain and an ON / OFF switch that I do not have the other. Perhaps slightly less well than the other as I have, but 2 times cheaper, all black, pleasant to touch.

For mobile DJs or karaoke, no need to put € 100 into a microphone, make a rather cheaper for 2

Value for money, perfect !!!

Dynamic microphone singing. I use it only for voice.

OVERALL OPINION

I use the microwave for a year now. It is really very strong and especially not this hollow in the mids that can sometimes have the SM58 ... For its price, this microphone is unbeatable: good frequency response, high gain (quite handy to hear the singer / the singer when musicians are still playing too loud. No need to turn up the gain of the bottom table and risking saturate) faithful reproduction of grain votes.

Small problem: a lot of "pop" (so be careful if you have the ability to do a lot of singing plosives). And for that alone, it may not be suitable for everyone ... So, it is better to settle for a Beta 58 which has the same definition with more shine and it will not default (but c is much more expensive ...).

To remedy this defect a little, add a pop filter between the gate and the capsule (but it does not completely solve the problem).

In summary, an excellent microphone (I have rehearsal studios in Lille and all my studios are equipped with the micro rather than the SM58) but beware of popping ...

vocal microphone dynamic terrain

Matte finish / Soft scratch very easily and finally it is very unattractive. more ca slides into the clamp. the on / off button has the merit to be there but a little cheap.
it is sensitive enough to pop out and the level is very low.

OVERALL OPINION

2 years troubleshoot
first micro obtained as a gift when I bought my profire 2626
I've never had before micro
the price is pretty unbeatable and if the brush in the right direction of hair growth (vis a vis the feedback in particular) it is the taf.

Already said

The construction seems solid except grid and feel the switch that breaks a full nose.

OVERALL OPINION

In fact it is present in the rehearsal studio or my group leads. I tried 2 times during rehearsals I had not had the opportunity or time to get my gear at home (Shure SM58 and AKG D7).

Verdict: Bha I see no reason to wrap around the bottom of the micro range. I found it encaissais not sound pressure and it was very loud in the treble. I recorded a repeat with this microphone and hear the difference clearly a AKG D7 and even (yes I know) an SM58. Not to mention the feedback ...

I put 6 for the price which is, admittedly, almost unbeatable.

Uni-directional dynamic microphone.

To use the voice and instruments.

Croyai me that's the price it was low-end, I was wrong, it is a great mic!

Say the same thing for static, should a budget approaching 600th most if not

OVERALL OPINION

I use it for a few months with a sound card RME UCX, a preamp gainstation1 SPL.

I compared a 2 Micro static low end ... It is far above!
A full, well-rounded and very warm. It fits very aisaiment in a mix that's what I like most. I tested on an instrumental MP3 (Rap) which has a very high level and I managed to put the voice and the back has a higher level while remaining music without distortion. After the mix has a lot to what is normal, but some are very hard to static treat!

I advise a microphone for Home studio owners. For the price, it is believed to have had a low-end surprise but it largely outperforms much more expensive condenser mics!

I would do this choice with pleasure.

I'm not going back on the technical characteristics, it is a dynamic cardioid microphone, something like 58 sm.
I am guitarist in a blues-rock and I do the vocals on some tracks. I needed a proper mic, I read the reviews on the Prodipe TT1 Lanen and told myself that for the price I did not risk much.

OVERALL OPINION

I bought this mic on Cygnus Audiofanzine for € 25, the switch model. Regular use, weekly, and live again, he has a potato this mic is terrible! My singer has an AKG D5, very good mic, I would say a bit more defined than the TT1, but less fishing. He tried mine because at our last live performance, people thought my voice sounded better than his own mix.
He was amazed, I was immediately told that less tired voice, because no need to force, the only complaint and this is true it is more directional than the AKG, with TT1 must always sing well in front of the cellule.Mis aside this detail, nothing!
I have a friend who runs a small recording studio in his park he has SM58, SM57 and TT1 he uses for vocals by the lead voice for this he uses a tube microphone, but for remains carefree.
With a quality / price ratio like that we can only recommend this microphone for those seeking an easy mic that sounds right away, just not enough perspective on his life, we'll see.

Micro dynamic to the scene or taken for "draft" in the studio without having to leave the static sensitive with his cage and everything.
I use it for voice and beatboxing.

OVERALL OPINION

I use it for several months. This is my first dynamic microphone. I really needed to have a small dynamic mic to record in all conditions, without breaking my head with my static (a m-audio luna which I am very pleased by the way).

What I love most is obviously the price (!) € 50 for a microphone that was done serious work. For cons, I can not tell its limits considering my use (working draft before making serious), and the fact that I have not tried yet on stage.

With experience, I will ever choose this without hesitation: I see it out over 50 € for a microphone that will use this. BUT ... if after testing on stage, I realize that in addition it provides, I revindrai change my opinion to put 10/10 everywhere!

I use this microphone to add sound and record the singer of my band.
We use it in rehearsal, recording and concert.
We are an amateur group, we are not super demanding, we want a versatile microphone that does not pose any problems and we seem to have a good sound.
We do not have neither the will nor the means to have an array of microphones.

This mic is great for us because it corresponds to our high standards.

OVERALL OPINION

I use it for 2 years since we tried it the other relegated only micro that we know, the SM58 in the closet.

Upon first use the singer was amazed by the result: a song that stands out and easily.
We also have fewer feedback problems with the SM58.
We are not experts in the sound and the sound system and it helps a lot.

What I like about this microphone is that it's simpler to have a good result.
I find the price / quality ratio excellent.
I do it again this choice easily.

cardioid dynamic vocal microphone

OVERALL OPINION

I use this mic for a little over six months, I wanted a microphone to dub my guitar amp but not the budjet for a 57 sm, I pulled on the advice of my dealer about this tt1.
microphone that has a good international practice.
value for money simply unbeatable for me.
I did recement the acquisition of a 57 sm and I realized I had spent € 70 too because I have a PA sysytem, ​​which holds the road and be very HOnet I do not find differences with the tt1, I used the same vocal mic (metal) and I left my 58 sm in his kit.

In summary, it must surely be better but for € 40 you do not prenezz the head, try you will not be disappointed mas.