All user reviews for the Prodipe TT1 Lanen

I'm not going back on the technical characteristics, it is a dynamic cardioid microphone, something like 58 sm.
I am guitarist in a blues-rock and I do the vocals on some tracks. I needed a proper mic, I read the reviews on the Prodipe TT1 Lanen and told myself that for the price I did not risk much.

OVERALL OPINION

I bought this mic on Cygnus Audiofanzine for € 25, the switch model. Regular use, weekly, and live again, he has a potato this mic is terrible! My singer has an AKG D5, very good mic, I would say a bit more defined than the TT1, but less fishing. He tried mine because at our last live performance, people thought my voice sounded better than his own mix.
He was amazed, I was immediately told that less tired voice, because no need to force, the only complaint and this is true it is more directional than the AKG, with TT1 must always sing well in front of the cellule.Mis aside this detail, nothing!
I have a friend who runs a small recording studio in his park he has SM58, SM57 and TT1 he uses for vocals by the lead voice for this he uses a tube microphone, but for remains carefree.
With a quality / price ratio like that we can only recommend this microphone for those seeking an easy mic that sounds right away, just not enough perspective on his life, we'll see.

Micro dynamic to the scene or taken for "draft" in the studio without having to leave the static sensitive with his cage and everything.
I use it for voice and beatboxing.

OVERALL OPINION

I use it for several months. This is my first dynamic microphone. I really needed to have a small dynamic mic to record in all conditions, without breaking my head with my static (a m-audio luna which I am very pleased by the way).

What I love most is obviously the price (!) € 50 for a microphone that was done serious work. For cons, I can not tell its limits considering my use (working draft before making serious), and the fact that I have not tried yet on stage.

With experience, I will ever choose this without hesitation: I see it out over 50 € for a microphone that will use this. BUT ... if after testing on stage, I realize that in addition it provides, I revindrai change my opinion to put 10/10 everywhere!

I use this microphone to add sound and record the singer of my band.
We use it in rehearsal, recording and concert.
We are an amateur group, we are not super demanding, we want a versatile microphone that does not pose any problems and we seem to have a good sound.
We do not have neither the will nor the means to have an array of microphones.

This mic is great for us because it corresponds to our high standards.

OVERALL OPINION

I use it for 2 years since we tried it the other relegated only micro that we know, the SM58 in the closet.

Upon first use the singer was amazed by the result: a song that stands out and easily.
We also have fewer feedback problems with the SM58.
We are not experts in the sound and the sound system and it helps a lot.

What I like about this microphone is that it's simpler to have a good result.
I find the price / quality ratio excellent.
I do it again this choice easily.

cardioid dynamic vocal microphone

OVERALL OPINION

I use this mic for a little over six months, I wanted a microphone to dub my guitar amp but not the budjet for a 57 sm, I pulled on the advice of my dealer about this tt1.
microphone that has a good international practice.
value for money simply unbeatable for me.
I did recement the acquisition of a 57 sm and I realized I had spent € 70 too because I have a PA sysytem, ​​which holds the road and be very HOnet I do not find differences with the tt1, I used the same vocal mic (metal) and I left my 58 sm in his kit.

In summary, it must surely be better but for € 40 you do not prenezz the head, try you will not be disappointed mas.

microphone for singing or recovery instrument (sax, trumpet, accordion)

OVERALL OPINION

I have long worked with a black fire sennheizer 527 for singing and I could not do without it. I must say I was worried for his succession. I try Shure (SM58, BETA58) but the grain does not suit me Pasetti sennheizer an E840 which I found pretty good.
there are some less music store prodipe I entrust this to test, then at the price I have seen dpart one can laugh but when I used I found it much better than the shure and my opinion as well as my old black fire that I thought iremplacable.
So do not look at the price, made the test.
for me anyway it is very well, j'espre that age well, I think take a deuxime but the pro TT1 model (without interruption)
for once and found the good stuff at low prices do not hesitate

The Prodipe TT1 Ludovic Lanen microphone is, hands down, a fantastic microphone that was developed by the French audio company Prodipe. The goal of the Ludovic Lanen was simple: they wanted to create a good budget microphone that didn’t compromise on sound and did not feel at all cheap in any way. What they came up with was the TT1. This microphone has a typical frequency response from 50 Hz to the typical hand held dynamic 15,000 Hz, and has a cardioid polar pattern. So the specs are nothing particularly fancy. In fact, those two particular things are straight copies of the SM58, a microphone more than triple the cost of the Prodipe. What makes it special is the fact that the company Prodipe simply went through a bunch of Chinese capsules and found one that was both cheap and biased in a certain way to lend the microphone a certain flavor. What ends up happening with this microphone is that there is a peak in the low end and a bit of clean air at the top. This makes the microphone sound very unlike a typical stage microphone, because it is surprisingly detailed.

OVERALL OPINION

The incredibly special thing about this microphone is that it costs less than $30. This makes it possible to acquire many of them very quickly. In use, I have found that these are not great microphones when you put many of them on many voices, as the lower frequencies do tend to get a little bit bloated. However, these can be used on pretty much anything, with it having a wide pickup pattern and a very high level of gain. On guitar and toms it sounds unbelievably expensive, or example. So if you need a workhorse that an double as a fantastic vocal microphone for live and studio settings, look no further.

Micro singing, dynamic type, a bit old style point of view, but very nice metal, really sweet.

OVERALL OPINION

So here I go out of a test rather surprising, sm58 course, SM86, Audio Technica atm70, sm 58 beta, and prodipe tt1. Well, there's no picture, prodipe is what is the best, it's unbelievable. Its level, perhaps it is the audio technica a tad better, but we were four, one blind eye, and impossible to believe that the price différence.Je 39 euros, we did think that it could not be better .
I work in the studio with the neve, the Avalon and microphones prestige, all that to say that .... I can be a bit used. I'm on c.. The worst thing is that as a console on stage using a Yamaha LS9 ... and there for sure, we'll end up with two microphones is frankly balls ...... the case of the century. Now on the strength of the product, I can not say anything, I just hope they will in the coup.J forget, no hangs feedback, at least not more than with others.

I use this mic for a short time, but what a nice surprise.
Thinner and more sensitive than a SM58, I compared both with the same settings.
No need to sing "head in", you can sit back with. It must be said that the signing of Ludovic Lanen is chose.On for any sound engineer is not by chance.
I even made a track with folk guitar, if the microphone is properly positioned, the rendering is very good.
With the clarinet, the heat of the instrument is very well rendered, whether in the bass or treble.

OVERALL OPINION

More than excellent value for money. It was worth € 150 microphones.
The hit is nice, the form also. What I like least is sold with the clamp and which is easily deformed, it would have a better grip clutching the microphone, but it's not the most important.
This is a great choice.

Philippe FOSSERZ