Not satisfied with those reviews?
Filter
Our members also liked:
4.5/5(6 reviews)
50 %
50 %
Write a user review
Users reviews
TonkaPublished on 11/15/04 at 08:29 (This content has been automatically translated from French)Dynamic vocal microphone for stage ... and can accommodate in-home studio.
OVERALL OPINION
Purchased 97 is still my mic scene, I never go anywhere without it.
When buying I compared with a SM58, and there's no bin photo, for the same price I prefer the BF811.
I have long been used in home studio and I'm pretty happy with the result, even if there is no headroom and the fine grain of a static, it is very clean with a nice rendering proximity.
I even managed to record percussion with: it's not for, but by spending a little time you get there.
In short a great microphone.00
WendPublished on 10/03/05 at 06:50 (This content has been automatically translated from French)Dynamic vocal microphone hypercardiohyde
OVERALL OPINION
I have been using for two months to live Franaise song text among others.
I'm glad we can not, more Cohr that SM58 is a sound to true happiness, but be careful, I ran a rsultat with some weird voice, but nothing 'insurmountable.
But even when I prfre much to SM58.
In addition it has a trs rjection right rear, plus a SM rsistant to feedback.
Short as happiness, I recommend it without worry.01- Doudou71Published on 03/23/08 at 03:50 (This content has been automatically translated from French)Singing, dynamic
OVERALL OPINION
-I have been using 1997en home studio and piano bar.
-I had a week available with a sm58 shure.J have had little hsitations, both for the issue of grain for Fidler rendering.
I believe that the wider bandwidth (50-18000Hz) that the sm58 is T determined in my choice, bf811 leaves nothing to lose.
-A report on the quality era silent trs good price (about 122).
-I would do this choice, it is a value sre.00