View other reviews for this product:
RaphRaymond
Published on 07/29/08 at 03:14
Dynamic Microphone Designed for supercardiode transplanted guitar amp, but that can be used stuff mdium rich and low-mdium.
Note the hyper ct practice for the design of microphone that allows it to hang in front of the guitar cabinet for the transplant is an economy of a microphone stand and especially place!
OVERALL OPINION
I compare it to that j'utlise sm57 a long time. This E609 me more each time I put him sondier front of my amp, whereas with a 57 half the time I had a screaming his trs. I am buying a history know him a little better and actually it's a big slap.
In making a comparison, the 57 sounds a bit dirty but bright and full of attack, the E609 is much more rich and low-mdium mdium, I think it goes down much more serious as the sound is cleaner, softer. It seems more linear than the sm57 which seems a bit nasal ct but the effect of proximity and may be a little worse for low gr trs quickly become invasive which is a common problem on 57.
It is therefore trs complmentaire and diffrent of 57. At 57 I use the Submitted for everything solo, arpge, lightweight little riff and E609 for all that is rhythmic and application of the scale and precision throughout the spectrum, especially in the bass.
I think it must be percu trs good on toms or congas type of batteries as well.
It is not EMDU on vocals, m'enfin there are better, it works well trs to effect a "little dynamics could allo houston problem we have."
Note the hyper ct practice for the design of microphone that allows it to hang in front of the guitar cabinet for the transplant is an economy of a microphone stand and especially place!
OVERALL OPINION
I compare it to that j'utlise sm57 a long time. This E609 me more each time I put him sondier front of my amp, whereas with a 57 half the time I had a screaming his trs. I am buying a history know him a little better and actually it's a big slap.
In making a comparison, the 57 sounds a bit dirty but bright and full of attack, the E609 is much more rich and low-mdium mdium, I think it goes down much more serious as the sound is cleaner, softer. It seems more linear than the sm57 which seems a bit nasal ct but the effect of proximity and may be a little worse for low gr trs quickly become invasive which is a common problem on 57.
It is therefore trs complmentaire and diffrent of 57. At 57 I use the Submitted for everything solo, arpge, lightweight little riff and E609 for all that is rhythmic and application of the scale and precision throughout the spectrum, especially in the bass.
I think it must be percu trs good on toms or congas type of batteries as well.
It is not EMDU on vocals, m'enfin there are better, it works well trs to effect a "little dynamics could allo houston problem we have."