All user reviews for the Sennheiser e 609
|9 reviews||41 %|
|9 reviews||41 %|
|4 reviews||18 %|
Anonymous 's review
Enter the Sennheiser E 609. It is a dynamic microphone with a supercardioid pickup pattern, so you can count on it picking up just what is in front of it. The Sennheiser E 609 boasts a comparatively impressive frequency response of 40-18,000 Hz, so you can count on it to pick up a few more of the nuances of a guitar through an amp than the Shure SM57, which only goes up to 15,000 Hz.
The microphone itself is unique in design, being very low profile, and side address. This makes it incredibly inconspicuous when using on stage or in the studio, and in the short time I had access to it, I found that having an E 609 in front of the guitar amp was more of a godsend than I thought. Its low profile makes sure that the E 609 never gets in the way, unlike the SM57 which will protrude from the amp. When working in cramp spaces, I can only imagine how much more secure one would feel.
The sound itself is very impressive. The SM57 is by no means a bad guitar amp microphone, but comparatively to the Sennheiser E 609, it sounds downright hollow. You just have to imagine the SM57 sound, but richer, and at the same time, a bit crispier. The low mids pop out with a sizzle that I did not previously know the low mids could have.
For roughly the same price as an SM57, you can have a dedicated guitar amp microphone. It's not the workhorse that the 57 is, but if you're completely aware of what you want to mic things up with, you shouldn't have to worry about not having an ideal microphone anyway. If you desperately need a guitar amp microphone just to have a guitar amp microphone, this is a great choice over the vaunted SM57.
3 of 3 people found this review helpful
MGR/daveb's review"Sennheiser E609"
Bought two of them at Piano's N Stuff in Blawnox, north of Pittsburgh. I think I picked them up for just under a $100.00 each since I was buying two.
I use two combos in my live set up. Any two of the following: Marshall 5175, Fender Studio Lead. Tech 21 Trademark 60. Hughes and Kettner Attax 80 or Gallien Krueger Backline 100. You put the E609 in front of the speaker, close up and you are done. The sound of the rig comes out front, not the mike (yes, I'm talking to you Mr. SM57). I put relatively high SPL into these knuckleheaded looking mics with no breakup. That's good.
you can't polish a turd. If your tone blows this microphone will not cure it.
Well made mic by a good company. Both of mine have about a hundred gigs on them and two recording sessions. No complaints.
You will not break the bank on this mike and should be very happy with the results. I you are not satisfied, please keep the wonder whisk as our free gift.
This review was originally published on http://www.musicgearreview.com
I used this mic at a friend's home studio and was not expecting much, but I was very surprised at the great guitar tone we were able to get very quickly. Actually, the sound coming out of the amp itself was not nearly as nice as what came through the mic, so you could definitely argue that the frequency curve of the mic itself is like a nice EQ for electric guitars. It is only around $100, and it's very handy for guitar tracks and the occasional trumpet solo. I recommend checking it out.
1 people found this review helpful
I purchased it new several years ago.
I can look at SM57 traditional: it is easier to position because of its shape, and I think it gives a softer, rounder in the grave, I found the SM57 a bit garish. However, I think it is good to have both on hand, it can be adapted according to the sound of the guitar sound with.
I would do without this choice problem, especially at 80 € hand.
5 of 5 people found this review helpful
zefotograf's review (This content has been automatically translated from French)
no, I've never tested other micro front, a peculiarity little strange is the way with a front and back. value for money well if I would do the same choice, no, I think I change category to climb a little higher as
7 people did not find this review helpful
Jujumix's review (This content has been automatically translated from French)" useful but not essential"
A good choice of its position is important is a super cardioid that is taking place faster than SM 57
I'm using it since 2002 I have other mics
Its directivity is more specific, the least is that it is not very versatile
1 of 4 people found this review helpful
sixcordes76's review (This content has been automatically translated from French)" Top!"
3 years of proud service.
I had before that good old SM57, but the record I like the 609 much more, ie more accurate, better response in the lower spectrum.
240 nine parrait me too hard, looking at a site USA for example ...
Micro robust, which does not need no mic stand, with experience, and if I ever let go one day, I rachèretais one without thinking!
I put 8 / 10 for 240 ... is not kidding either!
3 of 3 people found this review helpful
Sirius Sound & Light's review (This content has been automatically translated from French)" Nickel - We forget it's there - Very reliable and very practical"
This mic is perfect to use an electric guitar and amp. Ideal for a rhythm guitar, it is very easy to place (move the cable in the strap of the amp) and do not require a microphone stand. We quickly forget it's there, it was the sound coming from the amp directly to the console.
Small, quiet, very reliable, I prefer the SM57 for his sound, that presence and neutrality. Try also brass but I've never done!
3 people did not find this review helpful
alexarmens's review (This content has been automatically translated from French)" correct"
very handy because saving a foot on stage!
I prefer the 57 but still good in the studio I put two and attention to the phase in this case!
5 people did not find this review helpful
boomfred's review (This content has been automatically translated from French)
I use it for 8 years (still).
His glorious ancestor had much in session.
He never let me down but it remains fairly typical, less versatile than a SM57 for example, which makes it an excellent complement.
Very good value for money is of reinforced concrete.
With experience, I would do this election, probably by buying his successor.
2 people did not find this review helpful