Log in
Log in

or
Create an account

or
EN
FR

All user reviews for the Steinberg Cubase SX 2

(26)
Write a user review
Ask for a user review
Where to buy Cubase SX 2?
Less
No retailers are offering this product at this time.
Availability alert
There are no classified ads for this product.
New ad alert
4.5/5
(26 reviews)
5
58 %
(15 reviews)
4
31 %
(8 reviews)
3
4 %
(1 review)
2
4 %
(1 review)
1
4 %
(1 review)
Write a user reviewAsk for a user review
Users reviews
Sort by
Most recent
  • Most recent
  • Most useful
Sort results
Sort criteria: Most recent
  • Most recent
  • Most useful
  • moosersmoosers
    Steinberg Cubase SX 2Published on 02/07/09 at 18:00
    Steinberg Cubase SX 2.0 was easy to install as I had no compatibility issues with it. Overall, Cubase is an easy program, and is quite user friendly. I find the lay out easy to follow and the capabilities powerful. The manual can definitley come in handy as it has most of what you would need to know about this sequencer.

    SUITABILITY/PERFORMANCE

    I have run Cubase SX 2.0 on both a Mac Book Pro with a 2.2 Ghz Intel Core 2 Duo processor and 4 GB of RAM, and an Hewlett Packard PC lap top with a 3.0 Ghz processor and 2 GB of RAM. In both situations Cubase has worked great for the most part, with few errors. It has been quite stable for me and while I now Pro Tools instead, Cubase always …
    Read more
    Steinberg Cubase SX 2.0 was easy to install as I had no compatibility issues with it. Overall, Cubase is an easy program, and is quite user friendly. I find the lay out easy to follow and the capabilities powerful. The manual can definitley come in handy as it has most of what you would need to know about this sequencer.

    SUITABILITY/PERFORMANCE

    I have run Cubase SX 2.0 on both a Mac Book Pro with a 2.2 Ghz Intel Core 2 Duo processor and 4 GB of RAM, and an Hewlett Packard PC lap top with a 3.0 Ghz processor and 2 GB of RAM. In both situations Cubase has worked great for the most part, with few errors. It has been quite stable for me and while I now Pro Tools instead, Cubase always has run great for me.

    OVERALL OPINION

    Cubase SX 2.0 was the first sequencer I got about five years ago I used it for about two years before I got Pro Tools. Cubase always worked great and did everything I needed it to do, but the convenience of having most studios using Pro Tools forced me to switch. While I have come to love Pro Tools and now prefer it, Cubase is a great multi-track sequencer, capable of capturing great recording with ease. Like most high end sequencer, the price is somewhat expensive, but you are getting a well thought out piece of software that has vast capabilities. I have never run out of tracks with this and I'm a huge fan of the plug-ins that come with this. The EQs sound great, while the compressors are clean and do the job well. While 2.0 is now out of date, as they have up to Cubase 4. Cubase SX 2.0 worked for me quite well when I used it and I would definitely vouch for Steinberg Cubase.
    See less