Steinberg Cubase SX 1
+
Steinberg Cubase SX 1

Cubase SX 1, General Sequencer from Steinberg in the Cubase SX series.

Price engine
Classified Ads
Forums
iTek 04/22/2003

Steinberg Cubase SX 1 : iTek's user review

5

  • Like
  • Tweet
  • Partager
  • Submit
  • Email
The installation of Cubase SX is no problem. Think it is Windows XP. I think it is now possible to use with W98 without setting date and without online help possible!
No incompatibility but beware DIFFERENT plug in instruments, I have one that works but Cubase SX says missing a file. Dll?
In the configuration with all beginners at noon and the audio is a little dlicate. It is true that this is not a word processor and the manipulation of such software is often a Premire of its kind.
The manual is in. Pdf and must be said ... There's a vritable pav ... hard drive for printer ink.

SUITABILITY/PERFORMANCE

No problem running this software on my config. I had big problem with my config antrieure MIDI-based motherboard ABIT VIA chipset because of the USB or worse (I bought a PCI card with USB ports).
I've never had a crash. The only crashes I meet are not ds SX - well I think - but all the programs that I plug in adds a slave and I feel like a bug, especially if I open a internet session ... not to do. I would also say that my computer is Fully ddi music with just one connection to the net for the records of software and updates. Especially not install Office package on the same computer! Performance is as midi Whereas in audio (treatments differ in appearance and in a timely rels).

OVERALL OPINION

I use this software for over 6 months but I knew dj Cubase using it since version 3.7. At the very beginners, there's a few years, I worked on Atari but I never used other software midi / audio on a PC.
A little regret for the GUI. I AIM it seems a little more pro. It would be nickel we can choose the colors of the interface and the Steinberg site offers customized version.
I find the price justification and I advise everyone to buy it but be careful you may not be NCESS to use all functions of the SX ... then you turn the ct version of the SL least coteuse.
I would do the same choice is clear.

; =)