All user reviews of 4/5 for the Marshall JMP-1

Purchased to manage easily on stage and at the foot a lot of different sounds by subscribing via the multi-effect noon JMP1 and avoid invasive pedalboard.
I use since 2007, first coupled to a power amp marshall 2x80W 8002, and with a Digitech multi-effects which I forgot the name!
I will soon add to it a tube power amp peavey classic 50/50, it should not hurt to change the sound!

I'm pretty satisfied with the JMP, I use only the saturation of the preamp that suit me perfectly (rock / heavy). IN his clear what ets more limited (that ets Marshall, Fender not!), And I find that EQ output is not the luxury to get drinking sounds even with my Strat.

Noon patch is simple to perform, it works very well with a control pedal (I have a Behringer, too bulky).

Anyway I'm quite a fan of my JMP1, I look forward to associate the classic 50/50 because it seems that it gives potential with lamps ass ...

Pre amp lamp (I do not have the characteristics in mind ...
Saturated two channels and two clear.

Most is stored in the 99 memory settings! We can get more sounds and switch from one to another via a pedal noon example.

UTILIZATION

Setup is simple after throwing a look in the manual.

The factory presets give very good working basis.

SOUNDS

It's a Marshall! I love ...

OVERALL OPINION

Having the sound of a big amp in a small box ... I bought mine secondhand and I'm super happy with it!

I love the heat and I live branch on my sound card for recording or live on a PA system. As I play alone, are less gear to carry ...


Anyway good stuff.

I will not dwell on the characteristics given that everybody has already described.

UTILIZATION

The use is intuitive. There's just plug and change settings as QLQ a head amp to approach what we want.
I find the level that happens to approach the Mode Four (which for me is the only powerful in its Marshall). Apart from that we get the Marshall sound without big surprise. (I'm a fan of Mesa).
I board no manual as I bought used, but this machine is so intuitive it's not like a TriAxis (full of subtleties him).

SOUNDS

I'm more metal-oriented (different kinds) but I also rock the blues and a little pop rock.Ce preamp is not the one I use most since I board of other stuff in stock. Now I think he can be versatile enough (even if I place it below the TriAx tjs).
I play guitar so I get proper sound easy, it helps.
The sound I like most is the dynamic type fatty Mode Four qd I play the rhythm.
on the other hand for solo I do not like the Marshall distortion (too bland for me).
I do not use it either in its clean (except exeptions) because I board anything for that.

OVERALL OPINION

I do not since ais super longtps not bad but I board her bosse's.
I like the fact that we get a big distortion (like Neo) but must be behind the rest of the stuff I guess that makes him no less.
What I like least is that this lack of precision in the reglages.Autant TriAxis head can be taken because of that (for some) as sometimes I find it lacks a little something to get a QLQ I want exactly.
I found a TriAxis before buying and it is therefore back up this dernier.Je say that it is a good compromise qd can not go on to get the big Mesa son.Ca is cheaper and easier to implement.
As I bought a friend ais I board had the time to decide to buy it. So I think I will take it (especially if I had not Mesa).

Does everything said.

UTILIZATION

Simpler you die! One branch, the RULES in 5 minutes and voila the sound, the manual downloaded from the net is pretty clear.

SOUNDS

Trs well for the grunge, punk, rock and hard rock in gnral, limit for the metal.
Used with a Fat Start, a Washburn WI64 and an Ibanez RG 270 with Di Marzio pickups,
the Satus are quite nice greasy without being extreme, the clean sound is not clear trs, get crystal clear sound is impossible ... ah I'm told it's a Marshall ... Okay, as much for me.

OVERALL OPINION

did a little over a year I use, I like the possibility of safeguarding its presets, the simulation of loudspeakers and sound saturates the clean sound is not great but I m ​​' doubted it before you buy.

I bought OCCAZ so qualitprix good value, the price seems to me by nine against EXAGRES.

For the price I referrer the same choice.

For specifications and review the original preamp, see below. On mine, I made the change, Dr. Boost (chgt condos on the audio line - sixty, ceramic films cons - chgts 15v regulators, amplifiers chgts Ops - 10 in all, the OPA2132 and 4132 to replace TL72 and 74). I changed the lamps by EH and other minor changes to control the breath. At the exit, not really spectacular ... But over time, there is greater precision in arpeggios, sweeps in saturated crunch or even a little push. This is especially the crunch and clean as we gain a better definition. Breath less, sounds a bit more "hifi", more modern (OP amps and condos are certainly something). Warning! That remains the Marshall! In any case the sound is changed. But it becomes more versatile and flexible as thinner and better defined. Consequently, you discover other facets of his guitar playing that lead to other types of uses that most of Marshall. Modif - gear and MO included - must revolve around the 250 €. I made ​​myself a small fifty € uro by drawing samples from the component manufacturers (TI, National Semiconductors, etc.).. Warning! This type of change is still an adventure that n is not within reach of a beginner. It is better to master the solder and the practice of desoldering braid and desoldering pumps. So think carefully before you start it!

SOUNDS

I do rock, variety, jazz, blues, hard ... A little of everything .. what I use it with a Ampulator ADA (I have no amp) on a active speaker Thomann PA302. I think it sends just fine!