Marshall 1922 - imrryr's review
translatedBaffle 2 hp clstion gt12/75 (such as 1936 and 1960a)! Small and lightweight, convenient transport, sounds good as long as you do not send him too! I am mtalleux and marshall is rock! too much gai…
Marshall 1922 - tortueninja's review
translatedI bought it not because marshall, when compared with peavey dj we laugh much, but because the baffle c'tait the cheapest in 2 * 12 "and about 150 W .... and that's sucks ... To think that they know…
Marshall 1960B JCM800 Lead - Massimo Romeo's review
translated- Grille black, white strap. - Large white logo. - Vinyl lphant black grain. - 4 HP G12T-75W Celestion S88 12. - 300 Watts. - On wheels. - Non-switchable mono (16 Ohms). - Dim (mm): 760…
Marshall 1960A JCM800 Lead - Guillal's review
translated- Grid brown, white strap. - Large white logo. - Black vinyl. - 4 HP G12T-75W Celestion S88 12. - 300 Watts. - On wheels. - Non-switchable mono (16 Ohms). - Dim (mm): 760 x 830 x 360, w…
Marshall JTMC12 - Mr ok okok's review
translatedAvailable in two versions: 1 and 2 * 12 * 10 + celestion heritage or vintage (and all mixable) ... well look at what you buy because a 1 * 12 heritage is not like a 2 * 10 vintage !!!!! c makes the…
Marshall 1912 - Remyxc's review
translatedUnbreakable ... Durable ... Perfect sound ... A rgularit and held undisputed ... PERFECTION !!!...
Marshall 1922 - brui2fon's review
translatedQuality: Cheap, lightweight, not bulky, the sound is right for the Marshall sound, rock what ... defects: the wood is the medium, not the plywood as the high-end speakers, so c cheap, lightweight, …
Marshall 1960A JCM900 - luke 34's review
translatedThere are times when I do not understand ... how little we say that this speaker cabinet MODEL is the shit! is not out of course you have to compare like with like I use this personal speaker now als…
Marshall 1960A JCM900 - brui2fon's review
translatedI just wanted to remember 2 or 3 things .... 1) Marshall is the inventor of Baffle 4 * 12 closed (yes ...) 2) The Marshall speaker cabinets are designed to go with Marshall amps, and make the M…
Marshall 1960A JCM900 - imrryr's review
translatedBaffle archi-known, exists in several versions (hp) is what must be some good finds, sr gt12/75 between the equipment and the vintage 30 or greenback, it must have the cart! Here is the test that i…
Marshall 1960A JCM900 - patvmax's review
translatedSay what you want, for me they are the best .. I use them for more than 25 years, old and new! and I must say also that I did not have that marshall, the concurrency was also tested: peavey, engl, me…
Marshall 1936 - pierro-6's review
translatedI use it recently, and I must say that I have t trs surprised. First, the aesthetic: I find that he has a mouth of hell, it is not too large, without being either stunted. Then the sound: t…
Marshall 1922 - al31's review
translatedI have the last 2 months strength lightweight and compact, but at the expense of what: bad bad violin hp the sound is loud little it may be sufficient in jazz blues and pop the little time that…
Marshall 1936 - Crapy-jr's review
translatedTrs good speaker, Polyval, not too bulky, compared qualitprix unbeatable (half the price that boogie), although sturdy supporting transport rguliers. I use a Marshall 1959SLP rcente head, the sound…
Marshall VS412B - ghostrocket70's review
translatedI use this speaker with a jcm 900 head, the sound is awful, for the price buy a behringer plutt a baffle 250 is cheap there is no logo but it is a Marshall best value for money.
