Marshall 1922 - Berzin's review
translatedI used this cabinet for six years, essentiellment with a JCM 900. It is convenient because dplacer fairly easy, relatively lightweight and convenient dowry grips trs. It can operate in Stereo, which …
Marshall 1960A JCM900 - musicalcem's review
translated4x Celestion GT12-75 on wheels choice of 16 ohm or 4ohm mono 8 ohm stereo a real shit !!!-----> attention, a real shit for heavy or prog!, the sound is not accurate, that drool all over ... …
Marshall 1960B - awks's review
translatedIn the middle of 10 different booths (1960VTa & b, 1960JCM800a & b, 1965a & b, 1966a & b. ....) this one is among the best ever. 20 years at home and on stage from time to time, this beast does not f…
Marshall 1960A JCM900 - awks's review
translatedFor 30 years, two cab1960 trs old and 20 years since the 1960 SERIES JCM800 with 4x12G12T75 .. In the first of the Greenbacks and Vintage 25 in the other two G12T75, which has said the worst and the …
Marshall 1922 - yves.batisse's review
translatedI have 2 speakers for 2 years and despite mixed reviews, I find that a ring of well! I made the variety Baloch, jazz, blues, I accompany a singer, and I did like 80 dates a year, I always had what …
Marshall 1960A JCM900 - werty1's review
translatedBe careful, I might irritate the rockers, but this cabinet, what crap! I should seal the vendor has convinced me that the era marshall 1960a, the big sound on the cheap! I tried lots of tricks (para …
Marshall 1960A JCM900 - doodb's review
translatedI certainly do not understand the criticism that has made this brand! It is true that the original hp are good but nothing more, but once replaced by v30 ........ It sounds the ennnnnooooooorme! I'…
Marshall 1960A JCM900 - vlandrieu's review
translatedI'm pretty tonn to read as much criticism on this ngatives baffle. I use it for 5 years and he always satisfied in all situations. J'apprcie much versatility and made trs balance. I've used in severa…
Marshall 8412 - mijac's review
translatedI possde the cabinet for 15 years coupled with a marshall 8100 head pay 2500 francs era It is equipped Cellestis low-end at the finish, the Tolex is strong, it is not bad, but quite heavy possd…
Marshall 1960A JCM900 - yoyoland's review
translatedI intend to buy this cabinet soon and a little like brui2fon, I am a little "angry at the people who break the material to death because it is not for their style. Marshall is still a benchmark for r…
Marshall 1922 - roguewillot63's review
translatedI've had a week now and it spits out almost non-stop! Practical, not cumbersome, not even heavy! Plutt sturdy, well-quip (G12T two 75W ... we like it or not). The grips are latrales practices and …
Marshall 1960A JCM900 - planetslide's review
translatedI know the 1960 having only jou over quite often in the studio. So I think have a fairly objective view, because it tends to praise his gear. Whatever anyone says, I would simply say that one is a…
Marshall 1912 - Spooks's review
translatedAs the saying goes a little lower: "Unbreakable Durable ... ... Perfect sound ..." Me, has done since 1993 that I use a 50/50 power amp Marshall + All Tube JMP1 (pre-amp Marshall) You can go there …
Marshall 1960BV - slayer76's review
translatedI use this cabinet for a year and I must say that I jou is never as good on a speaker much better than the 1960 lead of any fawn there is no n RAPORT because it is like even a bit more dear the lead.…
Marshall 1960A JCM900 - silvosa's review
translatedI will simply say that after having played for years on the Marshall speaker cabinets they are a reference even though a lot criticism. I played on models pan right or cut with the original HP or n…
