All user reviews of 1/5 for the Gibson Les Paul Studio

Everything has been said. except that the handle is detestable .la finish is not worthy of GIBSON !!!

USE

Coarse handle the barrettes transcend and you scratch your fingers!
this guitar acute lack!
Good ergonomics .good sound.

SONORITS

Not this guitar arrives quickly has limitations .with a marshall it sounds very bold rather well
anyway.

NOTICE GLOBAL

I have it gard a year but I have not liked this gibson .j have bought a Epiphone Les Paul Custom
2 SD SH1 and SH4 pickups and c is the top !!!!!
Yes I have had lots of other guitars and I never repeat a studio!
GIBSON c is fucked in the world with this guitar.

Gibson made in United States
gibson round handle 490 and 498 micro
2 volumes and 2 tones
handle collbr /> mcaniques of m. .. e to prices

UTILIZATION

Channel enjoyable trs
ACCS at no acute (large bead)
curiously lightweight compared to my Gibson Sonex Deluxe prcedente
very good sound gibson

SOUNDS

Style rock, round
I have more bite with the microphones of the Sonex deluxe velvet
Yet dating from 1985

OVERALL OPINION

Tres studio version of this because if the sound is lbr /> for the price we MRIT much better in terms of quality finishing
I just received the guitar this week I sincerely think I have it back
for another model
I find it very average mcaniques that are more toys than real
mcaniques guitars. By comparison I bought a satriani js1000 last month
and I do not regret it at all (cheaper and 1000 times better)
I will aim for the les paul deluxe or something like that
les paul studio finished niet =

Objective approach:

Les Paul guitar shape amricaine
Cherry red lacquer
Mahogany body
Table in Saddle
Mahogany collbr /> Rosewood
Price 1,300 euros
Subjective approach

The guitar is INTERESTED see. Plutt pretty far, it is less Russian approach. Sanding and finishing of the frets, coating can be improved if not flawed.

Big manquo at the painting on the cloth that dteint microfibre when rubbed. A bit like the transparent varnish was applied on the paint does not allow time for this dernire Scher.

(2) Not spectacular in this price range, it makes a serious default does not forgive.

UTILIZATION

The handle is plutt enjoyable if we ignore the crimp. Include a comprehensive ergonomics standard Les Paul with the default inhrents and ask to be accepted by the consumer.

Plutt sensual touch is generally potentiomtres and 2 of volume and tone are practical Defines its sound.

The guitar has a tendency to brand dsacorder trs. Harmonics n'taient not RULES. The bridge n'tait not prpar and has eaten two sets of strings trs shortly.

SOUNDS

The guitar sounds good. In the registry clean you get a nice clear that TRS can be used as references. Crunches are fleshy and deep. I would put a little distortion on the BMOL hard-I too Whereas torture of del 8 / 10 potentiomtre of the race.

(8) trs good guitar sound in terms

OVERALL OPINION

1365 euros for you ...

the problem endlessly.

The sound quality is certainly good and the quality of a violin indniables. But these points do not allow this instrument dcoller the final grade. The problem relates above are unacceptable. Expect an after-sales service imbued with that believes itself to know everything and you reoit amabilis with a troop of CRS a G8 summit and you get a rsultat frustrating.

I can not imagine the young man who goes to work all the t to pay for this thing.

(1) Not advisable
No mp for this test. Thank you!

Complment, 7.11.2007:
I saw this guitar is sometimes sold in Switzerland opportunity for around 390 euros. At this price, it's a bargain, but only that price. Do not buy it for more than 500 euros.