All user reviews for the Millenium MS-2005

What is a foot micro ...
not rising as high as my Stagg, to put a microphone singing (unless the singer makes 2.20m) is a suffisant.Pareil charlet, snare ...
Overheads for this may be a fair bit I think, but why not, it could do, we should in this case raise the boom to its maximum.

While the system is not as developed, practical and well as other damn feet (to the old system rather with small handle for tightening), but he made his taf, and I did not feel to have something in plastok or likely to fall at the slightest fart old.

But less than 10 euros, I asked him not to behave as role models to 40 or 50 euros.

OVERALL OPINION

I bought this foot Thomann same time as another command, and I do not notice the bottom ... there was no chance of a sudden ... 2 ...
This foot was not for me but for my mother, who loves to karaoke with her friends, she wanted to put his foot Behringer XM8500.
I felt it was not necessary to buy a foot K & M. In fact, for this use, it is enough.
However, I tested at home before offering ...
I put the dynamics of course, and do not worry, the foot is set well, it is stable ... in short, the test "soft" held nickel.
And even if it is not intended for AC, I've plugged my micro tube (T SCT700 bone) to see if he did not move too much, and if it does not collapse to a single once, with a mic rather heavy (750 g with the suspension). And I tightly several times.
And although the result was beyond my expectations, I put the mic in any position, even the most perilous, and the foot ... well not move it!
Surprising at this price! Although somehow I prefer to use other feet, but it works!

Quality / price ratio more than excellent! I buy an accounts or two to complete my fleet of foot, as for singing microphones, other dynamic or static small membrane charlet for example, it will be fine.

So if you want a good start, good manufacturing, sturdy enough for singing on stage or studio microphones, ben ca does!

Metal microphone stand, not really light but not super heavy either, we feel that it's solid. Nothing really innovative: a tripod, a principal must walk up to 2m and qq and a pole that is 1 m and qq.

OVERALL OPINION

For almost two years, I have to take two others, then I 3. I've turned into a boom for movies / stories by removing the tripod and boom, the price is convenient. In conventional use, it works pretty well on the dynamic, static on my must make almost a kilo with the suspension but sometimes it looks just tighten.

For 10 euros more difficult to ask. Go if the clamp between the pole and the foot is a little too plastoc and over time will tend to deform and not to tighten but good for the price ...

Not need more for your home, on stage is different because the foot will be abused and less likely to hold water.

Mic metal, plastic joints (very) toc

OVERALL OPINION

Used for a year. Unbeatable price, finish ok but actually the joint tree-branch: I have been squarely in the beginning, as clearly a lot of other colleagues, using the branch below the joint - this has the default, with the weight + micro branch, to separate the holding piece is still made in a platic unsuited. Once against we understood that we must place the branch ABOVE joint (which after all makes more sense), no problem, it is resistant. We then established a completely sufficient condition homestudio resistant even "extended arm" to a micro quite heavy, stable, articulable height / depth with good movement, and thus a Q / P quite exceptional ... But for the HS only!

I use that foot for 2 months. for 9 euros is a good choice and it was worth the price. It is on the need not to put a microphone too heavy! but hey, there's feet more for that! For me, home studio, it's ideal. It is quite stable, the clamping system works well. I have 2 and one of them with feet apart at the bottom does not allow the pole to be right. Not too bad for me but if you go up the pole to the bottom, it's really not very stable. I do not see it on stage, strictly speaking it's good if you lift the pole too. The value for money is very good: € 9! I can not imagine better for that price. I also have a Millennium MS-2002 and Samson BT4 (much stronger than 30cm away and climbs above). This choice I would do without hesitation, it just depends on the use that I do.

OVERALL OPINION

Studio for use at a lower cost, it is the ideal purchase! I put 10 for the price / quality ratio!

...

OVERALL OPINION

Use for 2 years
I use 4 mic stands for Battery essentially taken overhead.
My pickups are plutt featherweight (RODE NT5)

Strengths
- Delivery / Price
- The base is stable Leaflets 100%

Points Ngatifs
- Do not over tighten the butterfly of the boom under threat of breaking the plastic
- Do not Leaflets 100% of its size, the foot. a look a little, nothing serious.
- Painting a bit fragile in the transport

Advice
- Promote micro featherweight. Avoid Beta52A example ^ ^
- Vrifier wear the threads of the screws (no problem encountered but given the price entry level, one can ask the question)
- Be careful when moving the paint

Report QualitPrix ... I would say plutt Delivery / Price
For me, trs well in any context: Concert, recording, ...
Can be avoid in a pro studio even when ... whatever one may ask?

Exprience with, you will do again this choice?
Yes, because I find the price of competing versions abuse even if it is true they have a better quality of production and a heavier weight in the base to support heavier microphones.

FEATURES? BAH ... Nothing fancy CLARIFY!

Oh yes, just this: the max of the foot is completely folded and completely unfolded 90 cm it is 220 cm.

OVERALL OPINION

Well for me it's not even worth the wait to have actually used, because obviously apart from steel tubes, the rest is only plastic for all that is tightening!

And then when unfolded completely, forget it (no stability).
If you really want all please take good squeeze "to death!"

The only advantage he has I have to admit is that you can put two clips on the same foot (great for a guitarist / vocalist for example) which allows a microphone to "instrument" and a microphone "song" on the same foot.

To clarify further that the adapters for microphone clamps are provided (the two washers and two other small stuff for vissser within two clips).

I was already 6 feet micro much more rigid and stable against the same problem but because tightening but relatively sturdy plastic end (€ 20 in store) and I needed another 6 so I opted for 6 MILLENNIUM MS 2005 to 10 € each on the Internet. Yet the picture I thought the clamps were made of steel and NO error is 100% plastic!

Honestly for 5 € more you buy the MS 2003 made entirely of steel from what I was told.

See below

OVERALL OPINION

I ordered three poles MS-2005 Thomann has 10 unites for my drum mics (2 Overhead and a microphone bass drum).

These feet seem quite fragile, plastic clamps, not very stable with heavy pickups, I strongly deprecated for those who must often dplacer (live, for example).

I will not amuse myself tighten / loosen without stopping, breaking provides. However they fully satisfy me, I use for my home studio on my battery, they do not move.

Once dplis, they are quite stable with microphones lightweight or medium weight, but you have to squeeze hard enough to not move a ...

Report qualitprix correct, I have never seen less than 30 feet in entry-level music store, so even if it is not the quality we can for 10 not expect better.

I would do certainly choose to use that I made in home studio, for the cons to live I would take beefier.

<span style="font-size: small; font-family: Times New Roman;">I use: SM 57, 58 acoustic instruments and M Audio Nova, heavier, for a spoken voice.</span>

OVERALL OPINION

I use two feet MS-2005 last week. I use it only at home. For the home studio, frankly the price is so ridiculous that I am more than satisfied. For the scene, I understand that we can be disappointed but should also be expected for this price. Therefore the price / quality ratio is excellent, stable foot, 2 screw clamps, adjustable on 3 levels ... I ask.
NB: I'm too wrapped up fragile and screws that are no longer in their office a few weeks. So, according to the weight of the mic is totally unusable because the joints .... slip due to poor clamping system.