All user reviews for the M-Audio Midisport Uno

- What characteristics have motivated your choice?

I did not have MIDI output because it is a laptop, so I had a MIDI / USB, the interface is small and compact seemed best suited.

- For what purpose?

I wanted to use it to connect my synth essentielment which allows me a different approach to creating a sequencer

- What is your config (Motherboard / CPU / Ram / Hard ,...)?

I have an Acer Aspire 3610 laptop with Intel Celerom M, 1.5 GHz and 504 MB of ram.

- Which instruments or the systems do you use? ...

For now I only use it with my MicroKorg.

UTILIZATION

- The drivers are stable?

Here is the major weakness of the midi interface, installation and start-up are truly catastrophic. I do not know where it comes in a week but none of my software could not detect the USB MIDI interface and yet I well désintallée / relocated 20 times (not an exaggeration). Everyone spoke of three successive instalations I had only two at a time.
But I think the solution comes from that fact, one night after having retried installing the Uno I am overwhelmed and I gave up by leaving it connected, suddenly 20/30 minutes later my computer rebooted for no apparent reason and return to Windows, the PC asked me to accept gentiles the famous third instalation interface midi / usb. Of course I did it and after this one, the interface worked and was well detected by my software.
So advice on this point, be very patient and after BOTH INSTALTIONS leave quietly plugged the beast and wait at least 30 minutes, if it nothing happens you can start to panic sail

- Are they often updated?

I never started playing the drivers for now ...

- What software do you use most often?

I use Cubase, Reason and Ableton Live.

- Do you ever happen to saturate the MIDI interface and if so, under what circumstances?

Besides the big problem of instalation it does not come love me more ... Finally, if the notes remain locked DEFOIS .. but that you just power cycle the synth There's nothing to cry ..

OVERALL OPINION

- How long have you use it?

I think it will make about four months that I use.

- What is so special that you like most and least?

The best: easy to use and can really bulky

Minimum: instalation annoying to the point of wanting to hang himself. I think a lot of people who do not find the solution to the bug on the instalation drop interface.

- How would you rate the quality / price?

The value for money is correct, for it was more expensive but can be more seriously I just though of this one.

- With experience, you do again this choice? ...

Not for instalation because I really had the chance to understand the trick .. veiled

If you want information on it, made me know

USB Mini

UTILIZATION

I had the unfortunate ide to purchase this gadget there are three or four months in order to control my pc by MicroKorg well as VST fly through my Yamaha Clavinova CLP 120.

The interface works ... sometimes ... with a lot of latency (fixes) and known bugs such as locking keys (as if you left a key on the synth constantly drives).

Now when I install the driver and then I connect the device APRS reboot the PC, the windows actually DTECT well, installs the device and recognize his name but ...
Ds I open a program using prriphriques noon, my Uno is not recognized, impossibility to transfer ...

I just tried reformatting, without installing the driver, change the USB port, find another driver, the driver Uninstallation, extraction in 32 Systm, hammers, small passage in the oven and pickling the ammonia but to no avail.

OVERALL OPINION

I pay good few tens of euros for this stypide bote son who has to march a few hours, is not recognized under Windows and when I worked Submitted whole range of bugs found for this device.

Buying strongly deprecated

Inerface twelve o'clock simple. Purchased in order to connect my pc to my ToneLab SE. A MIDI IN and MIDI OUT, the bare necessities.

UTILIZATION

Personally I have had no problems with this interface, very easy to use! But I did not use any apareils noon. Used software for ToneLab is, it works without problems.

OVERALL OPINION

I have a few months. I chose it because I tried a cheap midi interface which I could control my ToneLab. This interface is very economical and, in my opinion, reliable. I do not understand the reviews that say nothing works, I do not know how they managed! Yes I would do with the experience that choice without hesitation!

I was looking for something to drive my ToneLab SE AX100 and my future . With the Uno, I found what I needed for less.
My config: Laptop a Tosh Satellite M70-204 (Centrino 1.73 GHz, 1 GB RAM) running XP SP2.

UTILIZATION

A curious note: after install kit via CDROM, XP discovers the Uno and asked to install the driver! Which act and reboot.

Launch Tonelab Sound Editor: interface immediately recognized and operational. No crash to mourn, the drivers seem quite stable (those of the CDROM, I have not yet updated).

OVERALL OPINION

I use it for two weeks several hours a day (long live the holidays). What a joy to load the patches downloaded over the net and make its settings without being on all fours.

In short, to advise people looking for a midi interface simple and inexpensive.

Without hesitation, I would do this choice.

To connect to my PC with XP (I said in response to another opinion, Windows NT, it is for the office, you can not do with computer music)
1 MIDI input and output, that's all I ask ...

UTILIZATION

Installation in 2 minutes top chrono without a hitch with the software drivers on CD, my PC detects the device as soon as I plug it is reliable in the image of M Audio product.

At first I connected to my box digital piano Yamaha P 80 and my Triton rack, I open Sonar, I set up my MIDI devices in the options, I put myself on a MIDI channel, and FLOW, a VST instrument with such course.

Then two days later, I put my keyboard-guitar Lag The Key instead of P80, and in Sonar it does not detect it ... still works Triton output (midi in) but that's it ...

I check that the concern is not with the Lag and its MIDI connections (I would have been pissed off) by connecting it directly to the Triton with a MIDI cable, but the two devices communicate together ... it's not normally the connections so it's UNO.

So I'm going to the website of M audio to download the latest drivers (well y'en that dates from early 2005 ... I tell myself ooh lala, I hope it's not what I ' earlier)

Ben and the driver on the site is larger, I install it in place of another, and since everything is working normally!

So if you have similar interests as I do not hesitate to download the latest driver. I put 8 to ca ... they could immediately deliver functional drivers ...

OVERALL OPINION

Apart from this concern with my Lag, easily adjusted, it will run, it does what I ask him, and besides it does not require the purchase and more MIDI cables if your keyboards and other sound modules are not too far from your computer, in home studio.

Before I had a M audio Firewire Audiophile, and I never had no problems with MIDI, or with any other sound card or MIDI case in fact.

Here, a good product not that expensive since it's serious and it works spot on!

EDIT I ​​see my note seriously down!
Overnight, the MIDI cables of the box will not detect my device, an expander TRITON Lag and a master keyboard, the computer interface it worked. So I sent home as collateral Thomann, which I have returned one week later, but they did nothing, except tell me how to configure my interface in Cubase.
I gave them back a second time in their explaining that the problem was not from the "software" but it came in MIDI cables!
In short, they were sent home this time the M Audio, I just get it back a month later, and it still does not work ...

My PC is configured, the concern comes from the UNO, I do not know if the M Audio Service are chimney-builders or what, but I will not waste my time in this story!
I will send just a message to M audio Thomann also ...
I'll take one box at Edirol, with two MIDI cables and more, no more little boxes all in one, because if the MIDI cables integrated déconnent thing, I'm in the poo ...
If it works better for you, but if will have one concern, I hope you have better luck than me with the VAS of the brand!

- What technical specifications motivated your choice?

no, she sold t bte a computer store, so I was not spoiled for choice.

- For what purpose?

I needed to link the world's most bte, midi usb

Case it is a little cheap toy, it shakes and makes noise ... the connection is not unique, for two tips for 55euros and it is expected a little better than factory finishes limits ...

- What is your config (motherboard / CPU / Ram / Hard ,...)?

Windows XP not need to say more

- Which instruments do you use or the Systmes? ...

I needed to connect my little QY70 my PC to replace the connection to host, just too exotic ...

UTILIZATION

- The drivers are stable?

I do not know what was meant since the xp drivers are not provided when the famous plug and play, so it recognizes the machine, but not software, so ride on the manufacturer's website, a technical in French is available with links to all Tlcharger what is necessary and rolls ... almost

OVERALL OPINION

- How long have you use it?

one week

- What is the particular feature you like best and least?

for now no more, I did not get what I asked, half the time on my QY70 Data Filer did recognize, I still have not been able to save my work

- Have you tried many other models before acqurir?

no, no choice, buying too fast

- How do you report qualitprix?

hyper CHRE for what it is, even if a working ...

- With the exprience, you do again this choice? ...

not

I put two for data sheet on the manufacturer's website, it's nice to have thought that he must still arsolve the problem ... Designed and sell a product for xp w98 while also rpandu, call a default marketing

So c'tait for iMac, an early Intel. I use Logic Pro (7 and 8) and the keyboard is a Korg Triton matre The most of the time.

Basic interface, not CHRE, Intel Mac compatible, until the all is well.

UTILIZATION

And has to gte a bit. Well, it works, but then we often notes sections, or held, and we must disable the instrument (I only use virtual instrumentals) and then re-enable ... Well ok it's cheap, but when even!

OVERALL OPINION

Finally, I pay a 50 I believe in the era, was going to the studio is Grable, but for the same scne I did not tent: I bought an Edirol UM-3EX because of all fawns had to connect two or three keyboards in the computer of scne, and is stable!

Ben frankly a bte between 50 "one in / one out" and 65 for an interface "3 in / out 3" which is much more stable, it is clear that I would do not have a choice of Midisport Uno, in addition there must be at Edirol MODELS simpler and cheaper srement ...

I bought it to use the Zoom G9.2tt on scne by driving with a small laptop without the need for a complex interface or too CHRE.

UTILIZATION

Ct stability on the contrary opinion of some, I personally have never had a problem. Have built-in XP (and Vista) is the total p'n'p. I have used with MIDI software edition fairly simple (the Zoom G9, that of MicroKorg and Alesis Ion / Micron) without ever encountering any problems. The interface normally filled his rle EXAGRES no latency.

OVERALL OPINION

I've had a year or so, I find quite the simplicity of gnial Plug'n'play is a branch and work. On ct USB, the other two sheets MIDI In and Out (respectively nots "To MIDI In" and "To MIDI Out", no need of having to understand how the Polytechnic plug). In addition, as a small fits anywhere in a corner of Flight or briefcase. It is well finished and solid (a least to put a hammer on it or shear the cable is good for scne trs, home and studio.
At prices I pay for the widget in the 50 euros, as it fulfills its function perfectly, I find a correct.

If one day she lche, I think I do it again this choice without problem.

I need a midi interface / usb to drive my drum machine, I use XP with no problem.
for the choice he did not have much of a choice model in the store was quick.

UTILIZATION

the drivers are stable, no problem the instalation.
I use it to communicate with Cubase SX2 and my drum machine and between manager and my gt multi Indeed, I've never saturated, but it should be noted that I do not much solicits.

OVERALL OPINION

I use it since about 2005, with no problems good value for money, no down, no bug, it simply does the job.
I would do this choice without a doubt.

I bought the M-Audio Midisport Uno because I was looking to hook up a keyboard I had that had MIDI ins and outs. This allows you to send that MIDI signal to your computer via USB and control virtual instruments. This makes the the sounds you can play with a MIDI keyboard just about endless, providing you have the software. The only downfall of this is that it only has one MIDI input and output. It is basically a cable that has a MIDI converter in the MIDI and lights that show up when a signal is being either sent or received from the unit. I use this with a Yamaha Keyboard and a Mac Book Pro computer with a 2.2 Ghz Intel Core 2 Duo processor and 4 GB of RAM.

UTILIZATION

I use the Midisport Uno to control virtual instruments like Arturia Moog Modular and Native Instruments Elektrik Piano. It allows me to get a plethora of sounds with my keyboard that would not be possible without controlling it via MIDI. I can't think of a time that I really had a problem with this unit as it has always worked pretty well for me and has always run stable.

OVERALL OPINION

I've had the M-Audio Midisport Uno for about five years. It is nice to have around because I don't have a MIDI interface and I like to hook up my Yamaha keyboard that has MIDI jacks. I didn't want to spend too much on a MIDI interface becuase I'm not a huge MIDI guy and I don't use it all that often. This lets me use it when I need it without having to invest an expensive piece of gear. I would definitley recommend this to those who have a keyboard with MIDI jacks but don't have a way to hook it up to their computers.