All user reviews for the Analog-Lab Vocoder X-32

The vocoder is easy to use
prs resembles any way the 2000 version of EMS
benefitted from the will of its maker, JL Dierstein, which obviously has more talent as detecteut as a manufacturer of instrument ... good ides on paper, as a multi strophnie frquentielle of 32 bands

UTILIZATION

RAS

SOUND QUALITY

It is a fact that the gate
low intelligibilt lack of potato outrageous, and above all a terrible lack of heat and low frequencies ... passing a big bass minimoog the result is small, unspecified, dcevant ... This vocoder vocoder does not just but a bottleneck strangled

OVERALL OPINION

Luckily, I wanted to buy it
Luckily I did not buy!!
a friend beat me so I spent hours in his studio to test before ede tell me that I prfrais Plugz a vocoder that is to say ... its coldness, its appearance monotony (the sound that emerges is always the same), despite the diversity in the lemnts passs convinced me: this object supposedly manufactured to compete with old and vintage vocoder pnurie the new vocoder has for me no harm Intrets ca rings hollow

Let's go
I must post this notice in view of previous posts rather doubtful (lencal in this case, which was registered on 29 and has only one post on the clock, it smells like team Analog Lab full nose) thank you not to make pub please camouflaged by c the reviews ...

then ... eyes closed, I bought the X32, good reputation, encouraging article RECORDING .... etc ...

The bike is well built, solid, etc ... but now, its nice in the early hours of listening to very quickly becomes boring, uniform, flat and soft ....

How is this possible ????? will have one short side flavoring agent that is effective at first and then disappears

UTILIZATION

I push a rant ... many buyers like me have been very disappointed
Recording also disappointed me well, dare to compare with the 2000 EMS is almost like comparing a mini with Arturia VSTi !!!!!
Indeed, it can loosely resemble a distance, but the magic does not operate
It's hard, triturated, it is right, cold, without "human "....

Easy to use, it is a vocoder, you cable two sources,
So obviously the sound quality that comes out depends on the quality of sound that comes
second, how to tell if a vocoder sounds when you do not know the universe vocoder?

For my part, I worked along time with different animals (Sennheiser, Moog, EMS3000, Rehberg version, VP330, talkbox, Synton, Dopefer ).... as a connoisseur of good wines, of course, unfortunately, the X32 is not in the list of great wines, but stakes cheap and it must cool before drinking

SOUND QUALITY

In mixing, c really where it gets complicated ... this species doubling its stereo does not work, it creates the effect of masks on all other sounds, takes up space, has not fishing;
potato is generally defined a bike by his presence ... The X32 has no presence .... if you want in your mix, it is very well put forward, where it covers everyone and hides everything else ... short, it does not work ... low volume, it is "cheap" remote detached ... Why? because it has no grain ... in the lower, it becomes shabby ... nothing is happening, ca vocoder bad ... no one believes in one second ... cheap for quick c c balls for 8000 is just a bike with which you will not drive ... even plug the "orange vocoder" is more original, funny, creative and funny

OVERALL OPINION

Look at the number of people who have already tried to put it on the second hand market when he was barely out ... That's the sign that never fails .... contact all those who sell, and if they are honest you will see their trial is bright, uniform: It's bad, missed or did not do!

Well, me too I must post this notice as well. given the previous ones rather dubious posts (djef in this case, which was recorded June 11 ... written notice ... July 1 and has no counter-post to date, a feeling of the enema jur Analog Lab full nose) thank you for giving your opinion please OBJECTIVES. (I write not believe so excuse me for this advice, probably misspelled ...)

I find the X-32 - analog vocoder 32 bands a 100% comprehensive.

level connectivity, we can hardly expect much better. With between 2: excitation (carrier) and Ext / Int (modulation) on the front, leaving Mono main outputs with two L and R stereo, Direct Out (source from the excitation between ), Osc Out (internal oscillator), CV In, and finally the Noise Sub (bruitblanc substitution by other sound source) on the rear. It is a blind vraiemnt max! wow!

UTILIZATION

The general config is simple to understand, but to say it was a simple machine to understand ... but not necessarily to use (well, to get good results)

Minimal knowledge of sound synthesis and vocoding is welcome! but otherwise with a lot of experimentations and perseverace, even as we reach his goals.

For a machine of this price, it'll have to REALLY have a real manual printed with a minimum of pedagogy on the sound synthesis (ax on vocals) and vocoding ... preset "type" so we can get an idea of ​​how to get that type of sound ... I'm really DEU for the manual, I slap a 1150 well built machine certs, but comes with a so-called manual photocopy of seven pages, and it is not even on both sides. A special page "a copy" layer to serve as a memo to SETTINGS ... frankly not very well done. Artisanal? I will, but not the same as AMATEUR!

SOUND QUALITY

I find it sounds good FAT (greasy what)! very dynamik! I have not had a chance to really test it properly yet, but the little I tried, I am very satisfied!

he can be injected loops, or the sound of a synth a bit bland, and recover a sound with an interesting grain output, so it was used without moderation with all sorts of sound source!

OVERALL OPINION

I always use my FireworX as Vocoder. The X-32 being 100% analog, you can not save its settings, so my FireworX toutjours is often very useful for some type voice wanted ... whose voice has the Darth Vader for example ... But compared to plug-ins or Warp Factory (Vodo home Electrix), the X-32 sounds HUGE! and it is more intuitive than a utilisaiton the plug-ins ... Although it is very expensive, but given the components (32 analog filters!) Used to manufacture it, and the sound that comes out is almost same as jusitifier. It is certainly not the essential thing for a studio, but surely that will add the little "plus" in the prods. For now I will probably the same choice because it has no competitor at the moment (in the same price range, while anlao 100%). and I may not spend enough time for him to find big faults inpardonnable again. It is an instrument from a whole a try!
ANALOG LAB (Oliver?): If you read this one day, and you'll Write a real user manual, thank you for telling me to give me a copy! I am one of your first customers, I guess the "youthful indiscretion or other budgetary limitations will be here shortly surpasss? I think Analog Lab will gradually acqerir an international reputation in this small world analog, there are the quality! it's going to pay! so be sure your first customers who are here to buy stuff and support you

Vocoder 32 band analog totalemen 2 U rack
3 real internal VCO waveforms! (Control possible by HP)
LFO (whose speed can make the FM!) Synchronized by trig on the level of
inversion of possible entries for inter.
between the external noise of ought
spare output of the VCO
mono output + left right output (divisan frequency bands of a sure two cot and the rest of the other makes a spatial spectral)

In short, a fairly complete vocoder in its category.

UTILIZATION

Atention is not a VST plug! On an analog vocoder, it must be very careful about the levels of autremen, a risk of "drooling" or sounding "strangle" according to the settings and it is true that on this point, the X-32 is very sensitive (more than average I think), but personal, all fawn, I always put a compressor on between my voice vocoders and one can j'accentue generalemen acute.

May have to use the spare output of the VCO with a filter for use in analog synth (while using a vocoder continuan sparmen with a carrier outside!), You can also use this output to put a distortion or effect and the signal fed back from the external carrier (or the noise from external owed when using an external carrier).

Effectivemen, there is no patch or level per frequency band, but bands of 32, I'm not sure that would have a t very practical. It is regrettable as the hold on the VP or EMS but hey, its quality compared to its price compared to what we find to OCCAZ (and nine ...).

For voice, I added a lot of acute generalemen exiter for a longer high frequencies (that is true that the more easily discover EMS2000 allows the direct use of a microphone, the difference is on respect for phases and linarite frequencies. The disadvantage is that with one voice, we must prparer the signal of "exit" but cheaply and is that its use is more open boxes with rhythms, for example)

After, it is true that the opening of use requires a quasimen floor using a pramp, an equa compression and if you want to used the machine with a voice but on the other cot with a rhythm box or other instrument, makes a better carremen on another vocoder (like the 808 or kik to Jomox vraimen make out the low frequencies).

SOUND QUALITY

Hh! is the difference because he made his faith a little rule to ognions is a total massacre. I test a lot of analog vocoder (Synthon, EMS, Roland etc ...) but the it's crazy because we come to recognize the timbre of people talking! (Can be too perfect?)

Never given me a vocoder does such a grave and rendered in such a finesse in the treble. I may be owed prefer a form but that of the X-32 is also quite effective (especially when you start to rave with the noise from outside but it is not obvious because it takes a fairly powerful source jou and with the level of noise that does not disappear).

After, it's like a lot of analog vocoder, required a perfect management levels and a good microphone (pramplifi and equals (compress or via preamp or channel strip for a live micro sounds Rarely course an analog vocoder. (it can force a better vaud the top midrange and treble for vocoder of the text (and for a typical vocoder hold made more school, I use the exit "R" car stereo outputs use Half of the frequencies used sparmen Each one then, they made more irrguli permetent one and I find that R has a presence that brings the X-32 made of the EMS-2000 "S" generator made by))

OVERALL OPINION

Finally, it is EXTREMELY important to aprendre has to use a device before placing a notice. (A wise ...)

Personally, I test many vocoders (I love these animals l. ..) and this machine has made an incredible vraimen (but must manage what it brings (can be more than another but the coup vraimen Vaud)).

to the objectivity of some previous ones opinion, this is also a link that allows you to make a real ide http://www.sonicstate.com/news/shownews.cfm?newsid=2133 #. ..

I've now been in one week and confirm everything I ecri.

Vocoder 32 band analog rack fully 2 U
Internal VCO
LFO sync by trig on the input level
external input for the noise ought
separate output of the VCO
mono output + output right left

UTILIZATION

Initially I took a good hour trying to master the x32 and I have absolutely nothing in shot.

The galley .. Sound resonances, the voice was horrible, the worst was adding a module, the sound was really rotten and I do not know how to make it beautiful. And here I thought I was going to sell it because I was not able to do.

And the day appeared, I took 2-3 hour to understand the machine, created the sound that I needed for the modulation, a lead very clean (no lfo pitch, filter or amplitude) and a lead with grain anyway.
I have compressed the voice and is an eq by removing a lot of bass.

Vocoder voice was clear and beautiful without resonance (with eq) with a well analog and very different and far better than all the plugs vocoder market

SOUND QUALITY

I use a Neumann U87 and a trident 4t preamp channel strip for voice, I'm glad the sound is well analoque as I wanted!

By the way it's just a beat inside of the ball! but it must be compressed before.

Defois it lets high frequencies to be removed in the mix, but it does not matter that the very high frequency that is higher than the signal.

OVERALL OPINION

I use it for 3 months and I'm glad he joined my prods giving a different color and I would do the same choice without hesitation

That camera is very intuitive, because of the grip is a bit complicated with a lot of adjustment possible. little from the x32 in all directions and it sounds very little have divercifié, the sub enormous effects crazy beat, bass that moves depending on the beat is unlimited ..

Powerful rack vocoder 32 bands, very oriented analog ... I routed to a system of modular .... the CV is directed to a splitter (Vostok), which is itself sequenced on a laptop
noon not so ... I've enjoyed it y '(that is probably not the philosophy of analog lab
He is very focused way ... oldshool kraft werk is focused and it sounds much better without cloning the kind .. it is easy to have a voice + daft punk and many states at the sylhabes
rack

a big default for me, connected to the back, it's very annoying, it forces a duty to the contortionist

UTILIZATION

Config very simple ... you still know without serving prior to criticize negative

by far better than its competitors .. a condition to assay the signal .. and to have quality devices

SOUND QUALITY

Muy bien and much better than the acclaimed both ems2000

OVERALL OPINION

What I love is the grain ... it's amazing how warm it can make to move a text or a voice in
fair value for money (1000 euros) is the ca ... ... use it as a vocoder effect .. not like multi point on the second it pales parcontre

I like this machine that fits perfectly to my expectations (unlike for example a Monomachine

Recommended for lovers of routing via modular analog ... etc. ....
See you soon analog lab, the xpass and x32 are amazing machine for quality sound

of very heavy