Whynot
Note : 8 sur 10
Published on 10/06/04 at 15:01
Hi, I have the command 8 for 2 months now and am satisfied with the purchase.
APRS be surfing on the data sheets of products DIFFERENT equivalents, j'hsitais between the MCU and the command. I find the look of the MCU coolest and most importantly, the possibility of extensions are trs INTERESTED if you think having to use more than eight faders for its mix. The command8 prvoit does not (yet?) Extension faders unfortunately. In addition, the MCU multi seems more oriented software.
I finally chose the command because it is really dedicates pro tools, I use (LE 6.4 in this case) with a G5. And in this case, all the buttons on the command8 are fully configured to work on the table, rather than the mouse, which is the main CRITERIA purchase beginners.
There is a test of the MCU in a recording musician (I forget what numro in the spring I think)
Price level quality, I did not back STDP with other equivalents. the MCU is in the same water rates for all fawns.
The command 8, it has everything a great ... !
APRS be surfing on the data sheets of products DIFFERENT equivalents, j'hsitais between the MCU and the command. I find the look of the MCU coolest and most importantly, the possibility of extensions are trs INTERESTED if you think having to use more than eight faders for its mix. The command8 prvoit does not (yet?) Extension faders unfortunately. In addition, the MCU multi seems more oriented software.
I finally chose the command because it is really dedicates pro tools, I use (LE 6.4 in this case) with a G5. And in this case, all the buttons on the command8 are fully configured to work on the table, rather than the mouse, which is the main CRITERIA purchase beginners.
There is a test of the MCU in a recording musician (I forget what numro in the spring I think)
Price level quality, I did not back STDP with other equivalents. the MCU is in the same water rates for all fawns.
The command 8, it has everything a great ... !