Where to buy DMI 64 MKII?
Less
There are no classified ads for this product.
Tech. sheet
User reviews
2.5/5(2 reviews)
5
4
3
50 %
2
50 %
1
minimumvitalPublished on 12/27/05 at 04:31 (This content has been automatically translated from French)
One of the first expander ddi hammond sounds
UTILIZATION
Using a nightmare! I no longer have this device, but I remember with horror the total lack of conviviality to program sounds. A real galre. Worse than Roland is telling you!
SOUNDS
Despite all the good that was said t the era (launch publiciataire? Cronyism?), The sounds of the expander are extremely dcevant. He has not the warmth of analog imitation (often even friendly without looking like the Hammond organ), but did not approach "raliste" found Now on other expanders or formulations.
OVERALL OPINION
He stood at the trs expensive era: more than 10 000 F in 1992! I'm having the pub. I was looking for a hammond sound...…
UTILIZATION
Using a nightmare! I no longer have this device, but I remember with horror the total lack of conviviality to program sounds. A real galre. Worse than Roland is telling you!
SOUNDS
Despite all the good that was said t the era (launch publiciataire? Cronyism?), The sounds of the expander are extremely dcevant. He has not the warmth of analog imitation (often even friendly without looking like the Hammond organ), but did not approach "raliste" found Now on other expanders or formulations.
OVERALL OPINION
He stood at the trs expensive era: more than 10 000 F in 1992! I'm having the pub. I was looking for a hammond sound...…
Read more
One of the first expander ddi hammond sounds
UTILIZATION
Using a nightmare! I no longer have this device, but I remember with horror the total lack of conviviality to program sounds. A real galre. Worse than Roland is telling you!
SOUNDS
Despite all the good that was said t the era (launch publiciataire? Cronyism?), The sounds of the expander are extremely dcevant. He has not the warmth of analog imitation (often even friendly without looking like the Hammond organ), but did not approach "raliste" found Now on other expanders or formulations.
OVERALL OPINION
He stood at the trs expensive era: more than 10 000 F in 1992! I'm having the pub. I was looking for a hammond sound module, and the only c'tait on the market.
UTILIZATION
Using a nightmare! I no longer have this device, but I remember with horror the total lack of conviviality to program sounds. A real galre. Worse than Roland is telling you!
SOUNDS
Despite all the good that was said t the era (launch publiciataire? Cronyism?), The sounds of the expander are extremely dcevant. He has not the warmth of analog imitation (often even friendly without looking like the Hammond organ), but did not approach "raliste" found Now on other expanders or formulations.
OVERALL OPINION
He stood at the trs expensive era: more than 10 000 F in 1992! I'm having the pub. I was looking for a hammond sound module, and the only c'tait on the market.
See less
21
»
wooflonPublished on 01/25/07 at 08:28 (This content has been automatically translated from French)
Ddi-expander with organ sounds, period!
UTILIZATION
Edition galley is true, but it will not use it for that but rather for the full organ sounds have!
SOUNDS
Some are correct trs (Farfisa and some presets B3)
They may lack a little EHJV!
For the prog or psych pop is fine (he put a fuzz pedal output ca hard!)
OVERALL OPINION
+ Some sounds like the machine!
(Do not sound digital ..)
- Not very friendly indeed!
UTILIZATION
Edition galley is true, but it will not use it for that but rather for the full organ sounds have!
SOUNDS
Some are correct trs (Farfisa and some presets B3)
They may lack a little EHJV!
For the prog or psych pop is fine (he put a fuzz pedal output ca hard!)
OVERALL OPINION
+ Some sounds like the machine!
(Do not sound digital ..)
- Not very friendly indeed!
00
»
Manuals and other files
Other Voce organs
Other categories in Pianos & Organs
Where to buy DMI 64 MKII?
Less
There are no classified ads for this product.