Ultra Focus classified ad
New ad alertImages
Reviews
4.0/5(4 reviews)
50 %
50 %
Write a user review
genelekPublished on 08/12/04 at 00:23 (This content has been automatically translated from French)
Oh I put 8 but I know
SUITABILITY/PERFORMANCE
I put 8 but I know
OVERALL OPINION
Just tried marchand.Le comeback in the back!
We were tired of the sound misses .. sorry, loops ... you know the sounds that charm by their attack and ending insipidly by uniformed and using a stamp.
Focus on ultra sound all sound the same. Aigrelets.Mais All are in it for profanne cares dazzle at first.
I personally prefer the JV1080 in the same genre it sounds better.
I still do not understand why when the computing power of a computer is also large compared to that of a synthesizer (which is a small computer), why do not they well above synths synths material?
For sampled sounds on...…
SUITABILITY/PERFORMANCE
I put 8 but I know
OVERALL OPINION
Just tried marchand.Le comeback in the back!
We were tired of the sound misses .. sorry, loops ... you know the sounds that charm by their attack and ending insipidly by uniformed and using a stamp.
Focus on ultra sound all sound the same. Aigrelets.Mais All are in it for profanne cares dazzle at first.
I personally prefer the JV1080 in the same genre it sounds better.
I still do not understand why when the computing power of a computer is also large compared to that of a synthesizer (which is a small computer), why do not they well above synths synths material?
For sampled sounds on...…
Read more
Oh I put 8 but I know
SUITABILITY/PERFORMANCE
I put 8 but I know
OVERALL OPINION
Just tried marchand.Le comeback in the back!
We were tired of the sound misses .. sorry, loops ... you know the sounds that charm by their attack and ending insipidly by uniformed and using a stamp.
Focus on ultra sound all sound the same. Aigrelets.Mais All are in it for profanne cares dazzle at first.
I personally prefer the JV1080 in the same genre it sounds better.
I still do not understand why when the computing power of a computer is also large compared to that of a synthesizer (which is a small computer), why do not they well above synths synths material?
For sampled sounds on computer, it usually throws! but when it comes to a synth ... it's fleet.
A good example: listen to B4, then listen to charlie!
Should perhaps move up a gear story you realize that emerged from the 80's!
SUITABILITY/PERFORMANCE
I put 8 but I know
OVERALL OPINION
Just tried marchand.Le comeback in the back!
We were tired of the sound misses .. sorry, loops ... you know the sounds that charm by their attack and ending insipidly by uniformed and using a stamp.
Focus on ultra sound all sound the same. Aigrelets.Mais All are in it for profanne cares dazzle at first.
I personally prefer the JV1080 in the same genre it sounds better.
I still do not understand why when the computing power of a computer is also large compared to that of a synthesizer (which is a small computer), why do not they well above synths synths material?
For sampled sounds on computer, it usually throws! but when it comes to a synth ... it's fleet.
A good example: listen to B4, then listen to charlie!
Should perhaps move up a gear story you realize that emerged from the 80's!
See less
01
»
CitronPublished on 08/12/04 at 07:55 (This content has been automatically translated from French)
Installation simple and clear. It is inside in 5 minutes.
SUITABILITY/PERFORMANCE
The plug is compltement dnu bugs of any kind, the APRS a lengthy test.
The optimization is to go, I opened a dozen on my 1Ghz G4 ...
OVERALL OPINION
The message of Genelek particulirement surprised me, so I wanted to correct some points ...
First of all I do not agree on the quality of sound that I find wonderful, certainly not original, but trs well made compared to the original machines. I find agnial to have flopped in anthologies of synths in a plug. It is a time saver standards for composition and an addition Whereas in crativit.
Of course the sounds of Ultra Focus are shots of machines...…
SUITABILITY/PERFORMANCE
The plug is compltement dnu bugs of any kind, the APRS a lengthy test.
The optimization is to go, I opened a dozen on my 1Ghz G4 ...
OVERALL OPINION
The message of Genelek particulirement surprised me, so I wanted to correct some points ...
First of all I do not agree on the quality of sound that I find wonderful, certainly not original, but trs well made compared to the original machines. I find agnial to have flopped in anthologies of synths in a plug. It is a time saver standards for composition and an addition Whereas in crativit.
Of course the sounds of Ultra Focus are shots of machines...…
Read more
Installation simple and clear. It is inside in 5 minutes.
SUITABILITY/PERFORMANCE
The plug is compltement dnu bugs of any kind, the APRS a lengthy test.
The optimization is to go, I opened a dozen on my 1Ghz G4 ...
OVERALL OPINION
The message of Genelek particulirement surprised me, so I wanted to correct some points ...
First of all I do not agree on the quality of sound that I find wonderful, certainly not original, but trs well made compared to the original machines. I find agnial to have flopped in anthologies of synths in a plug. It is a time saver standards for composition and an addition Whereas in crativit.
Of course the sounds of Ultra Focus are shots of machines known to the general public dj. But he is able to manipulate these sounds remarkably Manir with its two layers of instruments, its four oscillators, effects, etc ... The possibility of Ultra Focus are simply endless, and easy to implement.
The quality of the synths of anthologies is concervé and the possibility of evolution are standards.
This is what I mean by technological revolution in music.
What good will any price change the type of instrument and its operation if it is to make an instrument with no soul and unusable? What good will all cost couraging an organ that best imitate the sound of a Hammond for rsultat DSIR leaving? I let the other rponse ...
The fact is that if I put that 9 / 10 the overall opinion of Ultra Focus, it is only to avoid the 30/30.
Any takers ...
SUITABILITY/PERFORMANCE
The plug is compltement dnu bugs of any kind, the APRS a lengthy test.
The optimization is to go, I opened a dozen on my 1Ghz G4 ...
OVERALL OPINION
The message of Genelek particulirement surprised me, so I wanted to correct some points ...
First of all I do not agree on the quality of sound that I find wonderful, certainly not original, but trs well made compared to the original machines. I find agnial to have flopped in anthologies of synths in a plug. It is a time saver standards for composition and an addition Whereas in crativit.
Of course the sounds of Ultra Focus are shots of machines known to the general public dj. But he is able to manipulate these sounds remarkably Manir with its two layers of instruments, its four oscillators, effects, etc ... The possibility of Ultra Focus are simply endless, and easy to implement.
The quality of the synths of anthologies is concervé and the possibility of evolution are standards.
This is what I mean by technological revolution in music.
What good will any price change the type of instrument and its operation if it is to make an instrument with no soul and unusable? What good will all cost couraging an organ that best imitate the sound of a Hammond for rsultat DSIR leaving? I let the other rponse ...
The fact is that if I put that 9 / 10 the overall opinion of Ultra Focus, it is only to avoid the 30/30.
Any takers ...
See less
20
»
dmarchepoilPublished on 09/12/06 at 02:10 (This content has been automatically translated from French)
The installation is not very intuitive but you get there no worries if you follow the documentation to the letter.
No compatibility issues.
The general config is very simple.
The manual is clear.
SUITABILITY/PERFORMANCE
Pentium IV 3 GHz with 1GB of RAM
Carton MAUDIO Audiophile external sound
The software works perfectly on this setup.
The performances are excellent.
The configuration is stable.
OVERALL OPINION
I use it for 8 months
The sound is excellent throughout but it is not always easy to find the right saw its interface with cascading menus.
I have not had the opportunity to try other apps like this.
The value price is right.
I think I would...…
No compatibility issues.
The general config is very simple.
The manual is clear.
SUITABILITY/PERFORMANCE
Pentium IV 3 GHz with 1GB of RAM
Carton MAUDIO Audiophile external sound
The software works perfectly on this setup.
The performances are excellent.
The configuration is stable.
OVERALL OPINION
I use it for 8 months
The sound is excellent throughout but it is not always easy to find the right saw its interface with cascading menus.
I have not had the opportunity to try other apps like this.
The value price is right.
I think I would...…
Read more
The installation is not very intuitive but you get there no worries if you follow the documentation to the letter.
No compatibility issues.
The general config is very simple.
The manual is clear.
SUITABILITY/PERFORMANCE
Pentium IV 3 GHz with 1GB of RAM
Carton MAUDIO Audiophile external sound
The software works perfectly on this setup.
The performances are excellent.
The configuration is stable.
OVERALL OPINION
I use it for 8 months
The sound is excellent throughout but it is not always easy to find the right saw its interface with cascading menus.
I have not had the opportunity to try other apps like this.
The value price is right.
I think I would do the same choice if it again.
No compatibility issues.
The general config is very simple.
The manual is clear.
SUITABILITY/PERFORMANCE
Pentium IV 3 GHz with 1GB of RAM
Carton MAUDIO Audiophile external sound
The software works perfectly on this setup.
The performances are excellent.
The configuration is stable.
OVERALL OPINION
I use it for 8 months
The sound is excellent throughout but it is not always easy to find the right saw its interface with cascading menus.
I have not had the opportunity to try other apps like this.
The value price is right.
I think I would do the same choice if it again.
See less
10
»
Anonymous Published on 03/19/09 at 10:38 (This content has been automatically translated from French)
Flawless installation.
Small snag for the activation of soft (I can not stand all these systems) but this is no problem. GUI clear but not conducive to sound creation. I tried to assign a MIDI CC controller keyboard, but it is not very fluid, changing settings is not natural and it's not a question of power.
SUITABILITY/PERFORMANCE
Core 2 Duo 2.4 GHz - 2 GB - HDD SATA - MiaMidi.
It is far too greedy. With a display of 1024x768, it can happen, we can put 2 or 3 in a session that sounds but in 1280x1024, 1 is already 40% in 8-note polyphony. So, I logntemps done track by track. If you want my advice, use your VST with the Renoise tracker, then we earn tens of% CPU. It must fall to...…
Small snag for the activation of soft (I can not stand all these systems) but this is no problem. GUI clear but not conducive to sound creation. I tried to assign a MIDI CC controller keyboard, but it is not very fluid, changing settings is not natural and it's not a question of power.
SUITABILITY/PERFORMANCE
Core 2 Duo 2.4 GHz - 2 GB - HDD SATA - MiaMidi.
It is far too greedy. With a display of 1024x768, it can happen, we can put 2 or 3 in a session that sounds but in 1280x1024, 1 is already 40% in 8-note polyphony. So, I logntemps done track by track. If you want my advice, use your VST with the Renoise tracker, then we earn tens of% CPU. It must fall to...…
Read more
Flawless installation.
Small snag for the activation of soft (I can not stand all these systems) but this is no problem. GUI clear but not conducive to sound creation. I tried to assign a MIDI CC controller keyboard, but it is not very fluid, changing settings is not natural and it's not a question of power.
SUITABILITY/PERFORMANCE
Core 2 Duo 2.4 GHz - 2 GB - HDD SATA - MiaMidi.
It is far too greedy. With a display of 1024x768, it can happen, we can put 2 or 3 in a session that sounds but in 1280x1024, 1 is already 40% in 8-note polyphony. So, I logntemps done track by track. If you want my advice, use your VST with the Renoise tracker, then we earn tens of% CPU. It must fall to 12% in heavy use.
OVERALL OPINION
It is true that the sounds are very diverse and successful samples but increasingly I walk away from the PC to go to the hardware, issue of grain noise and aesthetics even lifestyle ... In short, I will not go this election especially since I paid dearly to the output (+ 300 €) and the app is inrevendable! But I put 5 because it was my first software synth and he gave me the taste of these wonderful instruments.
Small snag for the activation of soft (I can not stand all these systems) but this is no problem. GUI clear but not conducive to sound creation. I tried to assign a MIDI CC controller keyboard, but it is not very fluid, changing settings is not natural and it's not a question of power.
SUITABILITY/PERFORMANCE
Core 2 Duo 2.4 GHz - 2 GB - HDD SATA - MiaMidi.
It is far too greedy. With a display of 1024x768, it can happen, we can put 2 or 3 in a session that sounds but in 1280x1024, 1 is already 40% in 8-note polyphony. So, I logntemps done track by track. If you want my advice, use your VST with the Renoise tracker, then we earn tens of% CPU. It must fall to 12% in heavy use.
OVERALL OPINION
It is true that the sounds are very diverse and successful samples but increasingly I walk away from the PC to go to the hardware, issue of grain noise and aesthetics even lifestyle ... In short, I will not go this election especially since I paid dearly to the output (+ 300 €) and the app is inrevendable! But I put 5 because it was my first software synth and he gave me the taste of these wonderful instruments.
See less
10
»
Tech. sheet
- Manufacturer: UVI
- Model: Ultra Focus
- Category: Other Virtual Synths
- Added in our database on: 04/19/2004
We have no technical specifications for this product
but your help will be much welcomed
»
Other categories in Virtual Synths
Other names: ultra focus, ultrafocus