View other reviews for this product:
FredDup
Published on 06/21/08 at 13:19
I bought this unit to the United States three months ago. The diffrence in price is worth it ...
Until now, I have REALLY used with its microphones, and I test a lot of places. The rsultats go through trs good: You Started the machine can not imagine right now and have great sound.
<ul> Fawn quite logical, we must learn to ask the right place.
We must find the right rglage for the level of. </ul>
Some examples: test-taking sound of an organ in a church. Professors of the organ, you win rglage make a "mid" I captured the clicking of the keyboard! on the other hand, if the organ accompanies the choir, you still rgler even on "high".
Another example of a decision of its carillon. To get an IDE, I measure 105 dB ct bells. "Low" is required. And gives a rsultat I've never received! Up Submitted I couraging this kind of sound recording with a minidisc. Sometimes with an mp3 recorder, equipped with a suitable microphone, a decent DBiT (192kbps). J'tais pretty happy with the rsultat. But with the H4, I spent a few notches above. If I do not tapped as many notes ct I could make a record from the sound without changing much!
Last example: piano too much agreement. I do not have all the effect of "honky-tonk" I had with the MD.
In short, I'm happy with my purchase trs.
Next test: use the four tracks for a composition (being WRITING) for two organs, violin and bells (yes, I like how "great"). The project is to play each instrument personally: all fawns, the carillon is absolutely impossible to marry "in rel" the organ ... I do not get my dsepre for by the fall! The first tests are encouraging. A few foul-ups with mtronome, which if properly rgulier, does not stall on the steps, but Get You Started with reading. Not good ...
Another criticism to the machine: it gnre files that all have the same date. Sometimes I do catch her later, without emptying my SD card. Obliged to archive all rcouter: All files are the same date. It does not matter ... but it's even Gnant.
Until now, I have REALLY used with its microphones, and I test a lot of places. The rsultats go through trs good: You Started the machine can not imagine right now and have great sound.
<ul> Fawn quite logical, we must learn to ask the right place.
We must find the right rglage for the level of. </ul>
Some examples: test-taking sound of an organ in a church. Professors of the organ, you win rglage make a "mid" I captured the clicking of the keyboard! on the other hand, if the organ accompanies the choir, you still rgler even on "high".
Another example of a decision of its carillon. To get an IDE, I measure 105 dB ct bells. "Low" is required. And gives a rsultat I've never received! Up Submitted I couraging this kind of sound recording with a minidisc. Sometimes with an mp3 recorder, equipped with a suitable microphone, a decent DBiT (192kbps). J'tais pretty happy with the rsultat. But with the H4, I spent a few notches above. If I do not tapped as many notes ct I could make a record from the sound without changing much!
Last example: piano too much agreement. I do not have all the effect of "honky-tonk" I had with the MD.
In short, I'm happy with my purchase trs.
Next test: use the four tracks for a composition (being WRITING) for two organs, violin and bells (yes, I like how "great"). The project is to play each instrument personally: all fawns, the carillon is absolutely impossible to marry "in rel" the organ ... I do not get my dsepre for by the fall! The first tests are encouraging. A few foul-ups with mtronome, which if properly rgulier, does not stall on the steps, but Get You Started with reading. Not good ...
Another criticism to the machine: it gnre files that all have the same date. Sometimes I do catch her later, without emptying my SD card. Obliged to archive all rcouter: All files are the same date. It does not matter ... but it's even Gnant.