View other reviews for this product:
djmagicball
Published on 07/05/07 at 23:31
Value For Money :
Excellent
I use the dual player for five years, never any problems.
What I like is the accuracy and reliability of this device. It reacts to the quarter turn. Super top, CD text, hot cue, the brightness compared to his brother CMX 5000 much better. As for weakness, I would say that the scratch is absolutely worthless on that drive. Nothing to do with a CDJ 1000 or 800. Otherwise, easy to use and very homogeneous, its nickel.
Before I swore by Denon, I had three generations of DN-2000 F and of course the DN-2500. Level longevity, nothing to do, they are machines fragile and often I send them back to the service or maintenance. Fragility of drawers, power ... I tried to DN 2100 and 2600, only to loop is Chinese. Then I had the CDJ 100 which will remain by far the readers of the best value for money, I tested the 800 and CDJ 1000 CDJ 1000 The tricks played at me long to recognize a CD, then I ' not like the place because it takes to make it with two turntables and a table. So, I opted for the new double CD Rack with recorder and amplifier feedback and control, for example below the table mix flat. Handling all events.
Level value for money, I must say I am very happy with my purchase. He has five years and this will no doubt be my last double CD. A remake, I want the same. For scratching, blah, it depends on the tastes and colors, it's not my thing. So I'm going. I had paid just under € 1,000 at the time, it is Paying-off in heavy use on Saturdays and some Fridays. The only thing I still do from time to time, it's blowing the light units, accessible from below, a screw, a valve. Then, a cleaning CD and it goes away.
Missing is the effect as the CDJ 100 and 200, but if you have a Pioneer table, not need. Too bad the tables with Pioneer can not hold a candle CD players of the same brand. Except perhaps the new generation 800 and DJM 1000.
What I like is the accuracy and reliability of this device. It reacts to the quarter turn. Super top, CD text, hot cue, the brightness compared to his brother CMX 5000 much better. As for weakness, I would say that the scratch is absolutely worthless on that drive. Nothing to do with a CDJ 1000 or 800. Otherwise, easy to use and very homogeneous, its nickel.
Before I swore by Denon, I had three generations of DN-2000 F and of course the DN-2500. Level longevity, nothing to do, they are machines fragile and often I send them back to the service or maintenance. Fragility of drawers, power ... I tried to DN 2100 and 2600, only to loop is Chinese. Then I had the CDJ 100 which will remain by far the readers of the best value for money, I tested the 800 and CDJ 1000 CDJ 1000 The tricks played at me long to recognize a CD, then I ' not like the place because it takes to make it with two turntables and a table. So, I opted for the new double CD Rack with recorder and amplifier feedback and control, for example below the table mix flat. Handling all events.
Level value for money, I must say I am very happy with my purchase. He has five years and this will no doubt be my last double CD. A remake, I want the same. For scratching, blah, it depends on the tastes and colors, it's not my thing. So I'm going. I had paid just under € 1,000 at the time, it is Paying-off in heavy use on Saturdays and some Fridays. The only thing I still do from time to time, it's blowing the light units, accessible from below, a screw, a valve. Then, a cleaning CD and it goes away.
Missing is the effect as the CDJ 100 and 200, but if you have a Pioneer table, not need. Too bad the tables with Pioneer can not hold a candle CD players of the same brand. Except perhaps the new generation 800 and DJM 1000.