All user reviews for the Pioneer CMX 3000

  • Like
  • Tweet
  • Submit
Average Score:4.2( 4.2/5 based on 21 reviews )
 11 reviews52 %
 7 reviews33 %
 1 user review5 %
Value For Money : Excellent
FP User10/31/2008

FP User's review

Pioneer CMX 3000
Everything excelent.... but I 'd like a Reverse swith and a better scratch like CDJ 1000

Price paid

900

Sound quality: Good

User interface: excelent The manual: I didn't need it All is easy for a fast mix

Originally posted on FutureProducers.com
Posted by: Unknown (January 1-, 2003)
FP User10/31/2008

FP User's review

Pioneer CMX 3000
It has everything you need.

excelent sound quality, no problems at all.

Very easy to use, very intuitive. For a newbie like me, it was about a week. From then on, you only have to continue playing with it.

the cd's tend to unload not so smoothly after a year. the jog wheel gets a little bit dirty and doesn´t flow as before

This is an excelent piece of equipment, I would buy it again if I had to. Very well made, no loose bottons, the pitch slider works very well after a year of banging mixes.

Originally posted on FutureProducers.com
Posted by: wakus ( 5-, 2004)
watts-dj06/25/2013

watts-dj's review (This content has been automatically translated from French)" Pioneer CMX 3000 bombings in power"

Pioneer CMX 3000
I was small toy and follows very satisfied, I buy used € 250 in June 2013 and do not regret my purchase.

Yes I tried other mp3 turntables before and I have custody in addition to Pioneer CMX 3000.
pco05/17/2012

pco's review (This content has been automatically translated from French)" No regrets"

Pioneer CMX 3000
I use it for over 10 years
I had tried other products before but of lower quality (Gemini, ..)

In my case, the characteristic is the size, flat systems can not suit me because I use a disco bar with Technics 1200MKII, so I have no alternative: I need a system that fits under the table to mix with the remote extension thereof

report excellent price / quality

Repeat this choice? I do not see other possibilities and considering its quality: YES without hesitation
titouu01/14/2012

titouu's review (This content has been automatically translated from French)" product and super simple utlisation"

Pioneer CMX 3000
The Pioneer CMX 3000 is really a good product for its features and ease of use (Multi-format CD Audio, CD-R, CD-RW, function "Emergency Loop
3 Hot Cues, Automatic synchronization of tempos, Scratch Mode, Wave Function Display, 2 digital outputs, Master Tempo, Loop adjustable IN and OUT, Inserting the CD slot in, Legato Link.
Very good for the mobile disco.
rirero01/13/2012

rirero's review (This content has been automatically translated from French)

Pioneer CMX 3000
How long have you use it? / I use 6 months and regret having sold
What is so special that you love the most, least? Easy to take charge
Have you tried many other models before buying it? Not really but I try I approve!
djmagicball07/05/2007

djmagicball's review (This content has been automatically translated from French)

Pioneer CMX 3000
I use the dual player for five years, never any problems.

What I like is the accuracy and reliability of this device. It reacts to the quarter turn. Super top, CD text, hot cue, the brightness compared to his brother CMX 5000 much better. As for weakness, I would say that the scratch is absolutely worthless on that drive. Nothing to do with a CDJ 1000 or 800. Otherwise, easy to use and very homogeneous, its nickel.

Before I swore by Denon, I had three generations of DN-2000 F and of course the DN-2500. Level longevity, nothing to do, they are machines fragile and often I send them back to the service or maintenance. Fragility of drawers, power ... I tried to DN 2100 and 2600, only to loop is Chinese. Then I had the CDJ 100 which will remain by far the readers of the best value for money, I tested the 800 and CDJ 1000 CDJ 1000 The tricks played at me long to recognize a CD, then I ' not like the place because it takes to make it with two turntables and a table. So, I opted for the new double CD Rack with recorder and amplifier feedback and control, for example below the table mix flat. Handling all events.

Level value for money, I must say I am very happy with my purchase. He has five years and this will no doubt be my last double CD. A remake, I want the same. For scratching, blah, it depends on the tastes and colors, it's not my thing. So I'm going. I had paid just under € 1,000 at the time, it is Paying-off in heavy use on Saturdays and some Fridays. The only thing I still do from time to time, it's blowing the light units, accessible from below, a screw, a valve. Then, a cleaning CD and it goes away.

Missing is the effect as the CDJ 100 and 200, but if you have a Pioneer table, not need. Too bad the tables with Pioneer can not hold a candle CD players of the same brand. Except perhaps the new generation 800 and DJM 1000.
hotmich12/31/2006

hotmich's review (This content has been automatically translated from French)

Pioneer CMX 3000
How long have you use it?

I use it for one week to purchase priceminister

What is the particular feature you like best and least?

trs trs simple to use! the record's only cover it serves me for being protected from dusts: P! non srieusement in 1 hour it was getting started!
I do not think it is weak, maybe the lack of effect and not reading the mp3 but it's no big deal ...

Have you tried many other models before acqurir?

Premire is not my plate, I just tried to quickly do the dns but I prefer the 1000 cmx3000

How do you report qualitprix?

So it's expensive pioneer! we must know what you want! 1100 new but you can find used and in very good condition for about 500! trs bone quality but I can find one cheap though, sof of opportunity!

Exprience with, you will do again this choice? ...

yes no Siter! trs good plate! me that beginners in the DJing I have all on the Russian master! trs simple, complete, great ...!
dj fonk07/09/2006

dj fonk's review (This content has been automatically translated from French)

Pioneer CMX 3000
Hi all. For those who have concerns with the CMX 3000, your mix should be reviewed because it works very well. Loop perfect simple to use because the ca smith and very fiable.Il is true for emergency against the loop loses ca 1bpm but nothing really recal what mechant.L advantage of text condition cd pensser say when burning cd.Startable from a DJM 500
What's better, a perfect sound.
boxmisteur05/08/2006

boxmisteur's review (This content has been automatically translated from French)

Pioneer CMX 3000
Product not to buy.

Loading time of inedit.du cd ever seen. The CMX 5000 is about 2 faith faster!
secondly because I have a poor reliability of renvoyr mine every 6 months with Pioneer to make it revised. (6 months of use for one month to repair c not too bad!)
Either buy cdj 800 if you can afford to be a pioneer cmx 5000, as remains of great fiabilité.dommage there are exceptions ...
Fortunately mine is sold!