PCM 91 classified ad
New ad alertImages
Reviews
4.4/5(7 reviews)
57 %
29 %
14 %
Write a user review
moosers
Published on 03/19/09 at 11:42
The Lexicon PCM 91 is a digital reverb unit. It is rack mountable and it will take up a single rack space unit. It is a stereo unit and it has both 1/4 inch and XLR inputs and outputs. It has a memory card slot for those who have older units or want to store their pre set sounds on the memory card to swap them between different Lexicon units. I have only used the PCM 91 in the studio, but it would also work well within a rack based guitar rig.
UTILIZATION
The general configuration of the Lexicon PCM 91 digital reverb unit is basic for a unit like this, but does like a bit of figuring out if you are not familiar with effects like this. It is easy to get and control the reverb pre sets...…
UTILIZATION
The general configuration of the Lexicon PCM 91 digital reverb unit is basic for a unit like this, but does like a bit of figuring out if you are not familiar with effects like this. It is easy to get and control the reverb pre sets...…
Read more
The Lexicon PCM 91 is a digital reverb unit. It is rack mountable and it will take up a single rack space unit. It is a stereo unit and it has both 1/4 inch and XLR inputs and outputs. It has a memory card slot for those who have older units or want to store their pre set sounds on the memory card to swap them between different Lexicon units. I have only used the PCM 91 in the studio, but it would also work well within a rack based guitar rig.
UTILIZATION
The general configuration of the Lexicon PCM 91 digital reverb unit is basic for a unit like this, but does like a bit of figuring out if you are not familiar with effects like this. It is easy to get and control the reverb pre sets and parameters that this has to offer, and also won't take to long until you are making and storing your own. The manual for this is pretty complete, and is definitely good to have around while you are trying to learn how to use the PCM 91.
SOUND QUALITY
The sound quality of the PCM 91 is top notch. The reverb effects are full sounding and the unit is overall versatile in terms of the different types of reverbs you can produce with this. I have used the PCM 91 on a myriad of different instruments, including electric guitar, lap steel guitar, vocals, and snare drum. I won't ever record with this on my signal, but while mixing it can come in quite handy.
OVERALL OPINION
I've been using the Lexicon PCM 91 for about five years, and while it is a great sounding reverb unit, I find myself using plug-ins more and more for reverb. The reason for this is because it is much easier to control and save, and I can get some sounds that are comparable o this unit at a fraction of the cost. While the reverbs on this will probably be better than that of most plug-ins, sometimes the convenience of plug-ins can outweigh a slight difference in sound quality. This being said, if you are looking for a rack mountable reverb unit, you definitely can't go wrong with this, but the big price tag will make a lot of people shy away because they can get reverb within their digital audio workstations. Overall, if you want a digital reverb unit like this, this is worth a try.
UTILIZATION
The general configuration of the Lexicon PCM 91 digital reverb unit is basic for a unit like this, but does like a bit of figuring out if you are not familiar with effects like this. It is easy to get and control the reverb pre sets and parameters that this has to offer, and also won't take to long until you are making and storing your own. The manual for this is pretty complete, and is definitely good to have around while you are trying to learn how to use the PCM 91.
SOUND QUALITY
The sound quality of the PCM 91 is top notch. The reverb effects are full sounding and the unit is overall versatile in terms of the different types of reverbs you can produce with this. I have used the PCM 91 on a myriad of different instruments, including electric guitar, lap steel guitar, vocals, and snare drum. I won't ever record with this on my signal, but while mixing it can come in quite handy.
OVERALL OPINION
I've been using the Lexicon PCM 91 for about five years, and while it is a great sounding reverb unit, I find myself using plug-ins more and more for reverb. The reason for this is because it is much easier to control and save, and I can get some sounds that are comparable o this unit at a fraction of the cost. While the reverbs on this will probably be better than that of most plug-ins, sometimes the convenience of plug-ins can outweigh a slight difference in sound quality. This being said, if you are looking for a rack mountable reverb unit, you definitely can't go wrong with this, but the big price tag will make a lot of people shy away because they can get reverb within their digital audio workstations. Overall, if you want a digital reverb unit like this, this is worth a try.
See less
20
»
U-FLYstudio
this is a good machine
Published on 03/06/13 at 10:24 (This content has been automatically translated from French)only unit dedicated to reverberation,
built around an aluminum frame, it is very thin outlook and absolutely no heating
I / O analog TRS and XLR digital AES EBU and SPDIF.
UTILIZATION
convenient, fast compared to the new PCM96,
SOUND QUALITY
less easy to include in any mix on the studio 70, 224X or 480L, anyway if you play with a 224X or 480L is after very hard to beat!!! !
live, I find that 91 is indeed the work in its programs and manufacturer équalisant a little effect return.
I love the real programem room, which is often the basis of all my other personal preset some halls of platforms and can not very convincing compared to my 224X
OVERALL OPINION
Today it is a...…
built around an aluminum frame, it is very thin outlook and absolutely no heating
I / O analog TRS and XLR digital AES EBU and SPDIF.
UTILIZATION
convenient, fast compared to the new PCM96,
SOUND QUALITY
less easy to include in any mix on the studio 70, 224X or 480L, anyway if you play with a 224X or 480L is after very hard to beat!!! !
live, I find that 91 is indeed the work in its programs and manufacturer équalisant a little effect return.
I love the real programem room, which is often the basis of all my other personal preset some halls of platforms and can not very convincing compared to my 224X
OVERALL OPINION
Today it is a...…
Read more
only unit dedicated to reverberation,
built around an aluminum frame, it is very thin outlook and absolutely no heating
I / O analog TRS and XLR digital AES EBU and SPDIF.
UTILIZATION
convenient, fast compared to the new PCM96,
SOUND QUALITY
less easy to include in any mix on the studio 70, 224X or 480L, anyway if you play with a 224X or 480L is after very hard to beat!!! !
live, I find that 91 is indeed the work in its programs and manufacturer équalisant a little effect return.
I love the real programem room, which is often the basis of all my other personal preset some halls of platforms and can not very convincing compared to my 224X
OVERALL OPINION
Today it is a machine used very affordable and there it gets interesting compared to the competition, to - € 800, this is a serious machine, not fragile, not heated, and has a sound rich with a wide range of possibilities in therm of pure reverb.
built around an aluminum frame, it is very thin outlook and absolutely no heating
I / O analog TRS and XLR digital AES EBU and SPDIF.
UTILIZATION
convenient, fast compared to the new PCM96,
SOUND QUALITY
less easy to include in any mix on the studio 70, 224X or 480L, anyway if you play with a 224X or 480L is after very hard to beat!!! !
live, I find that 91 is indeed the work in its programs and manufacturer équalisant a little effect return.
I love the real programem room, which is often the basis of all my other personal preset some halls of platforms and can not very convincing compared to my 224X
OVERALL OPINION
Today it is a machine used very affordable and there it gets interesting compared to the competition, to - € 800, this is a serious machine, not fragile, not heated, and has a sound rich with a wide range of possibilities in therm of pure reverb.
See less
173
»
xavier 31
Published on 03/10/06 at 13:07 (This content has been automatically translated from French)
- What are the effects or types of effects available? It is a rverbe
- What technology is used? (Analog, numrique, lamp ...) Analog
- Are they ditables? Via an editor Mac / PC? Not
UTILIZATION
- The configuration gnrale Is it easy? Correct
- The edition of sounds and effects is it easy? Correct
- The manual is clear and sufficient? ...
Only with a book in English literature, not easy to optimize the machine.
It is not normal that the manual is not in French for the price of the machine.
SOUND QUALITY
- Effects are they effective, suitable and adequate ralistes? Correct but a little because I expected better.
- Which instruments do you use? Samplers
...…
- What technology is used? (Analog, numrique, lamp ...) Analog
- Are they ditables? Via an editor Mac / PC? Not
UTILIZATION
- The configuration gnrale Is it easy? Correct
- The edition of sounds and effects is it easy? Correct
- The manual is clear and sufficient? ...
Only with a book in English literature, not easy to optimize the machine.
It is not normal that the manual is not in French for the price of the machine.
SOUND QUALITY
- Effects are they effective, suitable and adequate ralistes? Correct but a little because I expected better.
- Which instruments do you use? Samplers
...…
Read more
- What are the effects or types of effects available? It is a rverbe
- What technology is used? (Analog, numrique, lamp ...) Analog
- Are they ditables? Via an editor Mac / PC? Not
UTILIZATION
- The configuration gnrale Is it easy? Correct
- The edition of sounds and effects is it easy? Correct
- The manual is clear and sufficient? ...
Only with a book in English literature, not easy to optimize the machine.
It is not normal that the manual is not in French for the price of the machine.
SOUND QUALITY
- Effects are they effective, suitable and adequate ralistes? Correct but a little because I expected better.
- Which instruments do you use? Samplers
OVERALL OPINION
- How long have you use it? 2 weeks
- What is the particular feature you like best and least?
The sound skips, unless on a low-end rverbe
The price of another time
- Have you tried many other models before acqurir? Not
- How do you report qualitprix? Bad
- With the exprience, you do again this choice? ... I bought the PCM 91 for a rverbe the cathedral and I have chosen following the positive opinion on the internet trs. Personally I am a bit of to have bought new. I recommend the acqurir Used to 1,200 euros. Lexicon lives of its glorious past.
- What technology is used? (Analog, numrique, lamp ...) Analog
- Are they ditables? Via an editor Mac / PC? Not
UTILIZATION
- The configuration gnrale Is it easy? Correct
- The edition of sounds and effects is it easy? Correct
- The manual is clear and sufficient? ...
Only with a book in English literature, not easy to optimize the machine.
It is not normal that the manual is not in French for the price of the machine.
SOUND QUALITY
- Effects are they effective, suitable and adequate ralistes? Correct but a little because I expected better.
- Which instruments do you use? Samplers
OVERALL OPINION
- How long have you use it? 2 weeks
- What is the particular feature you like best and least?
The sound skips, unless on a low-end rverbe
The price of another time
- Have you tried many other models before acqurir? Not
- How do you report qualitprix? Bad
- With the exprience, you do again this choice? ... I bought the PCM 91 for a rverbe the cathedral and I have chosen following the positive opinion on the internet trs. Personally I am a bit of to have bought new. I recommend the acqurir Used to 1,200 euros. Lexicon lives of its glorious past.
See less
025
»
rroland
Published on 05/20/07 at 16:11 (This content has been automatically translated from French)
High-end Reverb with his classical lexicon. Entrtées / output in analog and digital (AES / EBU)
UTILIZATION
To the Lexicon, it's simple publishing compared to older models.
This is complicated when compared to other brands like TC. But hey, there is progress then we will not complain ...
SOUND QUALITY
Excellent quality. I read earlier that Afien preferred the sound of TC. I also have the TC but the Lexicon is warmer and more "fat". However, at this level there is no "best" or "worse", there are more "different" and the PCM91 is very high quality.
OVERALL OPINION
I use it for several years (when it is output). Previously I used a PCM90 with the same sound, but less presets...…
UTILIZATION
To the Lexicon, it's simple publishing compared to older models.
This is complicated when compared to other brands like TC. But hey, there is progress then we will not complain ...
SOUND QUALITY
Excellent quality. I read earlier that Afien preferred the sound of TC. I also have the TC but the Lexicon is warmer and more "fat". However, at this level there is no "best" or "worse", there are more "different" and the PCM91 is very high quality.
OVERALL OPINION
I use it for several years (when it is output). Previously I used a PCM90 with the same sound, but less presets...…
Read more
High-end Reverb with his classical lexicon. Entrtées / output in analog and digital (AES / EBU)
UTILIZATION
To the Lexicon, it's simple publishing compared to older models.
This is complicated when compared to other brands like TC. But hey, there is progress then we will not complain ...
SOUND QUALITY
Excellent quality. I read earlier that Afien preferred the sound of TC. I also have the TC but the Lexicon is warmer and more "fat". However, at this level there is no "best" or "worse", there are more "different" and the PCM91 is very high quality.
OVERALL OPINION
I use it for several years (when it is output). Previously I used a PCM90 with the same sound, but less presets and digital outputs in S / PDIF.
This is a reverb that does only one regret: that of not having bought earlier.
The price, of course ... it is not accessible to all "home studio" (which also have no need of such high quality). But hey, when you love, it does not matter, it is well known. This is pro reverb in the sound, interface and price.
UTILIZATION
To the Lexicon, it's simple publishing compared to older models.
This is complicated when compared to other brands like TC. But hey, there is progress then we will not complain ...
SOUND QUALITY
Excellent quality. I read earlier that Afien preferred the sound of TC. I also have the TC but the Lexicon is warmer and more "fat". However, at this level there is no "best" or "worse", there are more "different" and the PCM91 is very high quality.
OVERALL OPINION
I use it for several years (when it is output). Previously I used a PCM90 with the same sound, but less presets and digital outputs in S / PDIF.
This is a reverb that does only one regret: that of not having bought earlier.
The price, of course ... it is not accessible to all "home studio" (which also have no need of such high quality). But hey, when you love, it does not matter, it is well known. This is pro reverb in the sound, interface and price.
See less
111
»
Tech. sheet
- Manufacturer: Lexicon
- Model: PCM 91
- Series: PCM
- Category: Reverbs
- Added in our database on: 11/17/2002
We have no technical specifications for this product
but your help will be much welcomed
»
Manuals and other files
Other categories in Effects Processors
Other names: pcm 91, pcm91