View other reviews for this product:
djoulepunk « My opinion is mixed given the price ... »
Published on 10/08/10 at 07:26any dj t say!
UTILIZATION
The stick:
adj all t also said,
except I found the handle too thin, brittle see ...
probably to be fabulous (small) hands of Angus. ... Y
CASC to treble:
SG is a so ... SIR!
For my part,
when he "falls within", it "does not agree yours"!
yet it sounds perfectly fair but at the lower portion Lead in a song, it is also very good tt-r accord, can not go without sounding rhythmic horribly wrong ... I may be falling on a bad series, the luthiers at Gibson had a rum that day l. .. go figure ...
SOUNDS
I play without any effect the purist, just a jack of quality between the guitar and amp!
test:
Marshall Master Volume 2203:
feedback, warm in the low + medium rather attack with lots of punch forces do not push the gain to the risk of losing the top and bottom medium rather in favor of serious ... in super crunch, she sings the blue!
Dual-Rectifier and the lead channel MarckIV:
in saturated fat is not the best ... are medium rather high noys the grave, was drooling and does not settle, the highs are tric ... idem, lowering the gain ...
The clean channel-MarckIV:
standard, rich and big punch, again, she sings the blue ...
OVERALL OPINION
It sounds good but do not mistake the era, guitarists fan of AC / DC who seek the sound of Live 91 for example, will make a mistake in choosing this model ... it sounds better to play the old blue than the rest ...
APRS, I have several models of SG and finally this is not what I prefer
especially because the handle is too thin and that it does not take the agreement (at least for me, the other is obviously the chance ...)
I would add that the price does not justify completely the difference between the other SG in the same brand, you really have to worship exceptional Angus Young to want to pay it, I indeed did ds leaving the silent era it or 2500 Euro ... 1600E is now, I'll lose too much sparer ...
it even when the mouth ... with a change in: Mechanical I'll talk may be when I grew old enough to get back to blue ...
I have several models of SG and years DIFFERENT DIFFERENT (custom, standard or spcial) and now I play on the lowest of any CHRE:
a simple SG spcial of 95 I mount microphones with 57 '
and curiously, the sound is much richer than the signature Angus.Y certainly less punch but spcial is stronger and richer! ...
I do not do it again the choice of any signatures,
because of price, reliability and Son, is simply not more effective ...
UTILIZATION
The stick:
adj all t also said,
except I found the handle too thin, brittle see ...
probably to be fabulous (small) hands of Angus. ... Y
CASC to treble:
SG is a so ... SIR!
For my part,
when he "falls within", it "does not agree yours"!
yet it sounds perfectly fair but at the lower portion Lead in a song, it is also very good tt-r accord, can not go without sounding rhythmic horribly wrong ... I may be falling on a bad series, the luthiers at Gibson had a rum that day l. .. go figure ...
SOUNDS
I play without any effect the purist, just a jack of quality between the guitar and amp!
test:
Marshall Master Volume 2203:
feedback, warm in the low + medium rather attack with lots of punch forces do not push the gain to the risk of losing the top and bottom medium rather in favor of serious ... in super crunch, she sings the blue!
Dual-Rectifier and the lead channel MarckIV:
in saturated fat is not the best ... are medium rather high noys the grave, was drooling and does not settle, the highs are tric ... idem, lowering the gain ...
The clean channel-MarckIV:
standard, rich and big punch, again, she sings the blue ...
OVERALL OPINION
It sounds good but do not mistake the era, guitarists fan of AC / DC who seek the sound of Live 91 for example, will make a mistake in choosing this model ... it sounds better to play the old blue than the rest ...
APRS, I have several models of SG and finally this is not what I prefer
especially because the handle is too thin and that it does not take the agreement (at least for me, the other is obviously the chance ...)
I would add that the price does not justify completely the difference between the other SG in the same brand, you really have to worship exceptional Angus Young to want to pay it, I indeed did ds leaving the silent era it or 2500 Euro ... 1600E is now, I'll lose too much sparer ...
it even when the mouth ... with a change in: Mechanical I'll talk may be when I grew old enough to get back to blue ...
I have several models of SG and years DIFFERENT DIFFERENT (custom, standard or spcial) and now I play on the lowest of any CHRE:
a simple SG spcial of 95 I mount microphones with 57 '
and curiously, the sound is much richer than the signature Angus.Y certainly less punch but spcial is stronger and richer! ...
I do not do it again the choice of any signatures,
because of price, reliability and Son, is simply not more effective ...